1 / 28

Greenhouse gases in the Quaternary: constraining sources, sinks, feedbacks and surprises

Greenhouse gases in the Quaternary: constraining sources, sinks, feedbacks and surprises. Eric Wolff 1 and the QUEST-DESIRE team 1. British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK ( ewwo@bas.ac.uk ). Why palaeo greenhouse gases?.

jethro
Download Presentation

Greenhouse gases in the Quaternary: constraining sources, sinks, feedbacks and surprises

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Greenhouse gases in the Quaternary: constraining sources, sinks, feedbacks and surprises Eric Wolff1 and the QUEST-DESIRE team 1. British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK (ewwo@bas.ac.uk)

  2. Why palaeo greenhouse gases? • How do recent changes compare with natural variability? • Can we understand natural cycles? – important if we want to underpin estimates of (future) feedbacks • Does the past constrain the likelihood of “high impact, low probability” events (surprises)? • How did Earth respond to high CO2 climates? • Can we find analogues for large carbon releases in the past, to test effects and recovery?

  3. Plan for today • Set the scene by presenting the evidence • Challenge the AIMES community to understand (at process level) the records • Briefly consider which aspects of the past are most relevant to the future • Muse on the extent to which the Quaternary Earth System was deterministic

  4. Recent past – other GHG Etheridge et al 1996 MacFarling Meure et al 2006

  5. Greenhouse gases over the Holocene (10 kyr) Natural or anthropogenic? Ruddiman 2003 (Clim. Change, 61, 261-293)

  6. European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica (EPICA) Dome C 75ºS; 3233 m asl Mean T:-54.5ºC Core to 3270 m

  7. Estimated Antarctic temperature(based on water isotopes) EPICA Community Members, Nature, 429, 623-628, 2004; Jouzel et al., Science, 2007

  8. What does CO2 do in a changing climate? - CO2 responsible for 30-50% of the glacial-interglacial warming - probably controlled mainly through processes in the Southern Ocean

  9. CO2 in the last glacial Ahn and Brook 2008

  10. Dome C detailed CO2 Monnin et al (2001) Science 291, 112-114 Phasing is consistent with CO2 as an amplifier

  11. 13CO2 Lourantou et al, GBC, In Press (2010)

  12. Estimates courtesy of Andy Ridgwell

  13. But we are out of the range of the last 800 ka Lüthi et al., Nature 2008 (EPICA gas consortium) • In rate as well as concentration: • Fastest multicentennial rate in last termination was ~20 ppmv in 1000 years • 20 ppmv increase in last 11 years

  14. CH4

  15. But the late Pleistocene holds no analogue for the present And natural changes are dwarfed by the anthropogenic influence

  16. Rapid events in CH4 Greenland temperature

  17. Methane: the rapid jumps account for much of the g-ig change

  18. Causes of change (CH4) Sources • Wetlands • Northern • Tropical • Methane hydrates • Biomass burning • Others (vegetation,….) • Sinks • OH change • Temperature • Water vapour • Competition (VOCs) Isotopic evidence suggests no major role for hydrates

  19. δD of CH4 Sowers, Science 2006 Concludes marine clathrates are not important for these warming events No evidence of fossil 14C at transition Large blocks from Pakitsoq, Greenland. Petrenko et al., 2009, Science

  20. Combining Dallenbach et al (GRL 2000) and Brook et al (GBC 2000), you would conclude: Interhemispheric differences 3-box model Dallenbach et al, GRL, 2000

  21. d13CH4 - termination I • LGM d13CH4~3.5 ‰ heavier than Holocene • rapid d13CH4variations during Bolling/Alleroed -Younger Dryas • also slow changes during LGM and early Holocene when CH4 constant • dD 20 ‰ heavier in LGM (Sowers, 2006) • Data not really in agreement with conclusions of Schaefer et al (2006) Fischer et al., Nature 452, 864 (2008)

  22. Glacial/interglacial CH4 source changes 10 Variables: 5(6) potenial preindustrial sources with different isotopic signature 1 atmospheric lifetime 3 different sinks with different contributions 4 Constraints: CH4 concentration North & South dD(CH4) North d13CH4 South

  23. Isotopic constraints • Box model to estimate range of likely emissions and lifetimes in different time periods • Relatively minor changes in isotopic content suggest changes in hydrates and biomass burning emissions were modest • Concludes that main changes are in boreal wetlands and in atmospheric lifetime • But conclusion on biomass burning seems at odds with terrestrial evidence and lifetime changes are hard to explain (see Levine talk) • Also the wetland response seems stronger than bottom-up models would predict

  24. Last interglacial – how did CH4 react to Arctic warmth?

  25. Summary • Ice cores show us the unprecedented extent and rate of the recent increase in greenhouse gases and therefore radiative forcing • Large changes in Quaternary challenge us to understand natural cycles and test our knowledge of feedbacks (especially wrt ocean carbon and wetland methane) • Last interglacial might be used to seek reassurance against large methane releases under warming • For anything approaching an analogue for a world with higher CO2 we will have to tackle the harder questions posed by older climates

  26. How deterministic is this system?

  27. Thank you

More Related