250 likes | 464 Views
Diskusi Panel Terbatas – BAPPENAS – Bandung, 17 November 2011. European Crisis and The Indonesian Economy. Arief Anshory Yusuf – Padjadjaran University. Trade linkage, employment, and poverty from General Equilibrium Perspective.
E N D
Diskusi Panel Terbatas – BAPPENAS – Bandung, 17 November 2011 European Crisis and The Indonesian Economy AriefAnshory Yusuf – Padjadjaran University Trade linkage, employment, and poverty from General Equilibrium Perspective
The impact of European crisis on Indonesia (through trade) is not that clear (+) Labour Market Adjustment/Employment (-) Factor Intensity European import Export sector European crisis Export Indonesia (+) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) Import competing Sector Factor Intensity (-) Int’l Prices Import Indonesia European export (+) (-) Export ROW (+) Import dependent Sector Factor Intensity (+) (-) (+) (+) (-) (+) (-) (-) GDP ROW Import ROW INDONESIANECONOMY (+) Consumer Prices EXTERNALFACTORS Household Income Poverty
IMF-WEO2011 Forecast Source: IMF World Economic Outlook Database
Comparing WEO Forecast can give us an idea of how big the crisis is Source: IMF World Economic Outlook Database
Comparing WEO Forecast can give us an idea of how big the crisis is Source: IMF World Economic Outlook Database Verdict: EU GDP will likely to be 1%-2% below its baseline
EU is quite an important Indonesian export market (trading partner) – Export share (%) Source: GTAP v7 Database
… Yet, we are not really a very open economyExport as % of GDP Source: GTAP v7 Database
Analysis – General Equilibrium Assessment (+) Labour Market Adjustment/Employment (-) Factor Intensity European import Export sector European crisis Export Indonesia (+) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) Import competing Sector Factor Intensity (-) Int’l Prices Import Indonesia European export (+) (-) Export ROW (+) Import dependent Sector Factor Intensity (+) (-) (+) EXTERNAL FACTORS (+) (-) (+) (-) (-) GDP ROW Import ROW INDONESIAN ECONOMY (+) Consumer Prices INDONESIA-E3 Model GTAP Model A GDP shock of EU_25 by -2% Household Income Poverty
GTAP: Impact on EU-Trade Volume of world trade will be 0.8% below BAU Source: Author’s calculation with GTAP model
GTAP: Impact on world prices Source: Author’s calculation with GTAP model
GTAP: Impact on world trade (1) Source: Author’s calculation with GTAP model
GTAP: Impact on world trade (2) Source: Author’s calculation with GTAP model
GTAP: Impact on World’s GDP Source: Author’s calculation with GTAP model
Sectoral impact and its employment Source: Author’s calculation with INDONESIA-E3 model
EU is the biggest exporter of heavy manufacturing products Source: Author’s calculation with GTAP model
Labor market impact:Formal workers win, informal workers lose Source: Author’s calculation with INDONESIA-E3 model Capital and land owner lose too.. Its impact on distribution of income is unclear.
Income change seems a bit progressive in rural areas, no clear pattern in urban areas Source: Author’s calculation with INDONESIA-E3 model
Deflationary effect is progressive Source: Author’s calculation with INDONESIA-E3 model
All household welfare fall, but the rich suffer more.. Source: Author’s calculation with INDONESIA-E3 model
Poverty impact is + but non-significant Source: Author’s calculation with INDONESIA-E3 model
Concluding remarks (1) • The overall Impact of European crisis on Indonesia works through various trade channel and feedback. Its net effect is unclear. A call for a model approach. • To assess the crisis accurately, we need to apply reasonable size of the crisis. • Overall impact of the crisis on Indonesian economy is negative but small. • Indonesian traditional export like oil and gas will be hit hardest
Concluding Remark (2) • Its impact on labor market and poverty depend on the sectoral adjustment process responding to the shock. • Indication on labor market impact: Decline in employment in extractive sector and food manufacturing will likely to be bigger. • Formal labor wins, informal labor lose, but so does capital and land owner. • The poor get more benefit from the deflationary effect, yet it cannot compensate the decline in income. • As a result, poverty increase, yet its magnitude is insignificant.