30 likes | 155 Views
UBICOMP ‘01 A Hybrid Evaluation Approach for Ubiquitous Computing Environments Mark Burnett, Chris Rainsford DSTO, Australia. Typical Characteristics. Quantitative. Qualitative. Target Problem. Well defined, agreed metrics. Loosely defined, new, unknown metrics. Pros.
E N D
UBICOMP ‘01 A Hybrid Evaluation Approach for Ubiquitous Computing Environments Mark Burnett, Chris Rainsford DSTO, Australia
Typical Characteristics Quantitative Qualitative Target Problem Well defined, agreed metrics. Loosely defined, new, unknown metrics Pros Well defined outcomes, easy to compare candidates Allows exploration, encourages diversity, human subjectivity allowed. Cons Narrow focus, does not accommodate human subjectivity. Not well defined, hard to compare candidates, inconclusive. Evaluation Outcomes Improved performance Discovery of new approaches, identification of strong points Types of Evaluation TREC PKDD What’s the equivalent of ROBOCUP for a ubicomp environment?
suggests hybrid of qualitative and quantitative approaches A Hybrid Evaluation Framework Environment: • Ubiquitous/pervasive ·Invisible ·Connected ·Context-aware How to evaluate a ubiquitous computing environment? • choose a well-defined environment, for example a smart room • choose some well-defined tasks for a hybrid evaluation What to evaluate in a ubiquitous computing environment? • software infrastructure and services in support of a task • participants can build their own smart room (devices+infrastructure+s/w)