430 likes | 487 Views
Thermal Management Concepts. Richard Wirtz Mechanical Engineering Department University of Nevada, Reno August 20, 1999. Overview. Current Technology Hybrid Fan Sinks and Spot Coolers Performance Increasing Strategies Variable Load Coolers. “Passive” Heat Sinks. Results and Comparison.
E N D
Thermal Management Concepts Richard Wirtz Mechanical Engineering Department University of Nevada, Reno August 20, 1999
Overview • Current Technology • Hybrid Fan Sinks and Spot Coolers • Performance Increasing Strategies • Variable Load Coolers
Results and Comparison Ducted Flow Rs-a[oC/watt] 28 cfm 130mm x 70mm x 40mm Note: R = 0.4 oC/watt Q(ideal) = 11.2 cfm
Bypass Effect Wirtz, Chen and Zhou (1994) JEP, Vol. 116, pp206 - 211
Fan Sinks R.A. Wirtz and Ning Zheng (1998) “Methodology for Predicting Pin-Fin Fan-Sink Performance”, Proc. Sixth Intersociety Conference on Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, pps 303 – 309
ImplicationstoFan-Sink Design b = best fan efficiency a = best H.S. performance
Other Performance Ideas • Single-fluid H.E. performance limit: cpQ • The size may be reduced by increasing: • the heat transfer surface area per volume • the heat transfer coefficient
Woven Mesh Porous Matrix An anisotropic porous matrix having large and large ke in a particular direction will result in a very effective heat exchange surface. • Porous Media (uniform particles) • High Surface Area per Volume, • Fixed Porosity, 0.4 • Effective thermal conductivity, ke 20% kparticle • Isotropic Characteristics • Woven/Braided (3-D) Mesh • High (variable) • Variable Porosity, • Anisotropic (k and p)
Serpentine Biaxial Weave Orthogonal, 3-D Mesh(copper/solder) Exchanger plate Shute Wires Exploded View Parallel Plate Heat Exchanger,(FTM)
Woven Mesh FTMPerformance PredictionComparison with Offset Fin FTM
CorrugatedorGrooved ChannelsIncrease U Wirtz, Huang and Greiner, ASME Journal of Heat Transfer, Vol. 121, pp. 236 - 239.
Augmentation Mechanism Re < 350 Re 350 Re 800
Friction Factor Grooved Smooth
Serpentine ChannelConstant Cross Sectional Area CorrugationSnyder, Li and Wirtz, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans., Vol. 36, pp2965 - 2976
Phase Change Materials • Incorporation of a heat storage capability in the temperature control system of an electronic module having a variable heat dissipation rate will allow for a smaller, less-power-consuming module cooler and better temperature stabilization. • Materials formulated to undergo phase transition at key temperatures can provide this load-leveling capability via the latent heat effect.
Heat Storage Surface qout” qin” [w/cm2] 1 cm 6% (Vol) Metalized PCM composite. qin = 6 W/cm2 qont = 3 W/cm2
PCM Options • Solid - Liquid Materials • Paraffins, non-paraffin organics, salt hydrates, metallics. • Solid - Solid Materials • Materials that undergo reversible solid-state phase transitions. • Organic Compounds, Metallic Oxides, Encapsulated S-L PCM’s • Latent heat comparable to S-L PCM’s • Packaging is easier
Solid-Solid PCM-based Heat Exchangers • Passive Heat Storage Mechanisms (all) • Heat exchangers that are insensitive to heat load variations • High-performance (thermally conductive solids or high-heat-flux convection and radiation surfaces) through metalization. • Near Ambient Operating Temperatures • -15oC < Ttr <150oC. • Inexpensive net-shape manufacture • Possible complex heat exchanger shapes • Operation is independent of ambient pressure or system orientation.
COOLANT C B A Heat Source Design Concepts“dry” PCM Hybrid Coolers A, C = Metalized Storage Volumes B = Heat Exchange Volume Metallization = discreet or integral
AIR FAN HEAT EXCHANGER METALIZED PCM q’’(t) Discreet Metallization Application
Hybrid Heat Sink Thermal Response Ttr = 83oC, Ttr = 6oC, q1/qinit= 2
Hybrid Sem-E FTMSteady Performance Offset strip-fin vs hybrid (porous) design. Coolant = PAO. 6% (vol) Metalized PCM heat exchanger surface.
Hybrid Sem-E FTMUnsteady Load PAO flow rate = 2.5 #m/min Nominal load = 1000 watt, Load factor = 1.5, Duty cycle = 30%