140 likes | 147 Views
Explore the impact of habits of mind and self-advocacy on students' process writing, empowering them to engage, create, and persist in a flexible and responsible manner. Investigate the relationship between theory and practice to foster cognitive habits for success.
E N D
Habits of Mind Laboring in Service of a more Comprehensive Process Writing Natasha Wickenheiser Ivy Tech Community College, Bloomington nwickenheiser@ivytech.edu
Grounding Scholarship • Process Writing • 1970s – 1980s • Prewriting, writing, rewriting • Empowering, writer-focused (Bloom) • Post-Process Theory • 1990s • No generalized writing process exists (Bloom 36-37) • Framework for Success in Post-Secondary Writing, Habits of Mind (CWPA, NCTE, NWP) • Curiosity • Openness • Engagement • Creativity • Persistence • Responsibility • Flexibility • Metacognition
Innate Relationships Between Theory and Practice Engagement Creativity Synthesizing source work; connecting ideas Curiosity Draft; evaluate effects of design choices Openness Conduct research; ask questions Peer review; seek feedback Consider rhetorical situation; attention to conventions Process Writing Reflect on draft’s strengths and needs Attention to citations; incorporating feedback Overcome procrastination; finish project Flexibility Metacognition Persistence Responsibility Cognitive Habits
Self-Advocacy: Theory and Practice • Definition • “The ability to speak up for what we want and need” (Schreiner 300). • Four Components • Knowledge of self • Knowledge of rights • Communication • Leadership (Test et al. 49) • Strategic Learning Plan • Conduct a self-assessment • Set a goal • Create a plan • Draft a timeline
Research Question How does exposing students to the habits of mind, and inviting them to engage in self-advocacy practices, impact students’ conceptualization and practice of process writing?
Student Population Studied Student Demographic Sample Sizes • Enrolled in summer Collegiate Literacy seminar • Conditionally admitted to public, Midwestern university • First-generation college students • Predominantly students of color • 2016 cohort • 29 students • 2017 cohort • 23 students
Research Methods • Student Portfolios (52) • Final Strategic Learning Plan • Reflective portfolio cover letter • Surveys (24 responses of 50) • Composition 1 – 12 (50%) • Composition 2 – 12 (50%) • Interviews (6) • 3 male, 3 female • 3 African American, 3 Caucasian
Student Response to SLP Laboring Process RageZ “I understand my needs as a writer and how to use them as tools to improve myself. I can reflect on things in a more professional manner to better prepare myself for more challenging topics” (Scott, cover letter).
Impact on Writing Process ELSA International Laboring with habits of mind through self-advocacy can help students Feel a stronger sense of responsibility to complete coursework Practice metacognition to recognize and correct less-effective choices Conceptualize process writing as practical and intellectual work Recognize the value of cognitive habits in other aspects of their lives / identities
Conclusions Electricnude Students can benefit from three separate, but interrelated types of processes: • Process writing • Process writing informed by the habits of mind • Process of composing a Strategic Learning Plan
Circulated Materials Habits of Mind Laboring Self-Advocacy Laboring Habits of mind handout Writing self-assessment • Strategic Learning Plan • Version 1 (semester-long) • Version 2 (individual units/projects)
Works Cited Bloom, Lynn Z. “The Great Paradigm Shift and Its Legacy for the Twenty-First Century.” Composition Studies in the New Millennium: Rereading the Past, Rewriting the Future, edited by Lynn Z. Bloom, Donald A. Daiker, and Edward M. White, Southern Illinois U, 2003, pp. 31-47. Council of Writing Program Administrators, National Council of Teachers of English, and National Writing Project. Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing. CWPA, NCTE, and NWP, 2011, wpacouncil.org/files/framework-for-success- postsecondary-writing.pdf. Schreiner, Mary. B. “Effective Self-Advocacy: What Students and Special Educators Need to Know.” Intervention in School and Clinic, vol. 42, no. 5, 2007, pp.300-304. Scott. Cover letter. Test, David W. et al. “A Conceptual Framework of Self-Advocacy for Students with Disabilities.” Remedial and Special Education, vol. 26, no. 1, 2005, pp. 43-54.
Contact Natasha Wickenheiser Ivy Tech Community College, Bloomington nwickenheiser@ivytech.edu