1 / 15

10 th European Meeting for SP/TM - ENFSI Marks WG Bled , 7 th June 2013

AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEM FOR SHOE TRACKS. 10 th European Meeting for SP/TM - ENFSI Marks WG Bled , 7 th June 2013 . Origin of the P roject. Titel : NEXT GENERATION OF AUTOMATIC PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEMS FOR FORENSIC SHOE TRACK APPLICATIONS

jill
Download Presentation

10 th European Meeting for SP/TM - ENFSI Marks WG Bled , 7 th June 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEM FOR SHOE TRACKS 10thEuropean Meeting for SP/TM - ENFSI Marks WG Bled, 7th June 2013

  2. Origin oftheProject Titel: NEXT GENERATION OF AUTOMATIC PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEMS FOR FORENSIC SHOE TRACK APPLICATIONS Core Target: Development of an automated footwear retrieval system Participation: forensity(industry partner) - Knows the challenges and needs of shoe track specialists - Responsible for a praxis oriented research (e.g. testing material) - Makes from the research results an application University of Basel, Computer Vision Group (research institute) - Has profound technological know-how in visual computing - Does the research - Delivers a practical procedure in image matching Financning: Commission of Technology and Innovation of the Swiss Government

  3. OverviewPrevious Research Synthetic Data 2005 De Chazal DFT 81% 2005 Zhang Edge Histogram88% 2006 PavlouSIFT 85% 2006 Ghouti Wavelet Decomposition100% 2007 Crookes Phase OnlyCorrelation82% 2008 GuehamCorrelation Filter 94% 2008 Patil Gabor Feature Maps91% 2008 AlGarni Hu Moments 99% 2008 Pavlou SIFT codebook92% 2009 Nibouche SIFT + RANSAC97% 2013 Wei SIFT + Correlation 96%

  4. OverviewPrevious Research Synthetic Data VS Real Case Data 2005 De Chazal DFT 81% 2005 Zhang Edge Histogram88% 2006 Pavlou SIFT 85% 2006 Ghouti Wavelet Decomposition100% 2007 Crookes Phase OnlyCorrelation82% 2008 GuehamCorrelation Filter 94% 2008 Patil Gabor Feature Maps91% 2008 AlGarni Hu Moments 99% 2008 Pavlou SIFT codebook92% 2009 Nibouche SIFT + RANSAC 97% 2013 Wei SIFT + Correlation 96%

  5. OverviewPrevious Research Real Case Data • 2009 DardiMahalanobisMap50% • CervelliSpectral Analysis 17% • database not publiclyavailable • notolerancetorotation, scale, translation

  6. OverviewPrevious Research Real Case Data • 2009 DardiMahalanobisMap50% • CervelliSpectral Analysis 17% • database not publiclyavailable • notolerancetorotation, scale, translation • 2011 Tang Graph Embedding 70% • databasenot publiclyavailable • toostrong assumptions( lines, ellipses, circles ) • 2009 DardiMahalanobisMap50% • CervelliSpectral Analysis 17% • database not publiclyavailable • notolerancetorotation, scale, translation

  7. ShoeprintMatching System Overview Input Data: Database: User Interaction: • Rotation • Cropping • ScaleNormalization • Mark Outsole • Mark Regionsof Interest Classification: - Feature ExtractionandMatching

  8. Input Data - Issues Input Data User Interaction DB Classification AdaptedfromCervelli et al. 2009

  9. Input Data - Source • Over 20’000 crimesceneshoeprintsandreferenceprintsprovidedby: • Test-Database currentlycontains • 220 shoeprints& 1115 referenceprints • Still underdevelopment 9

  10. User Interaction I/II Input Data User Interaction DB Classification

  11. User Interaction II/II Input Data User Interaction DB Classification

  12. Realignment Input Data scale rotation User Interaction Realignment DB Classification

  13. ClassificationResults Cumulative Match Score 220 Shoeprints / 1115 Reference Prints Input Data User Interaction Realignment DB Classification

  14. Conclusion • Overall promising results in theresearchfield • Still a varietyofchallanges • Unconstrained Noise, Photos, Transformation invariance • Need forstandarddatasets& researchprojects

  15. Questions adam.kortylewski@unibas.ch

More Related