220 likes | 431 Views
Indifference Curve Analysis 1. Develop indifference curves 2. Develop budget constraint 3. Some basic analysis: a. changes in prices; b. changes in income; c. the Engels Curve 4. The Food Stamps Problem. Indifference curve:
E N D
Indifference Curve Analysis 1. Develop indifference curves 2. Develop budget constraint 3. Some basic analysis: a. changes in prices; b. changes in income; c. the Engels Curve 4. The Food Stamps Problem
Indifference curve: A collection of points for which the consumer is indifference between each of them and some reference point. Typically shown in the context of a two good world on a two-dimensional graph.
The axiomatic approach to indifference • curves is a search for a minimum set • of assumptions regarding consumer • behavior through which to generate • indifference curves. • Standard axioms: • More is preferred to less—nonsatiation • Completeness—all points in a relation • Transitivity– A B; B C; A C
These two sets of indifference curves represent people who differ in their relative willingness to trade food for medicine. Which one is hungry? Careful.
The budget equation: • B = pogOG + pfF • OG = B/pog – pf/pogF Meaning: The budget equation will depict a curve in OG-Food space that is downward sloping (note: its derivative –pf/pog is negative).
Applying calculus to find an expression for the slope of the other curve, the indifference curve: OG/F = - (U/F) /(U/OG) or, using an equivalent notation: OG/F = - MUf/MUog
At an equilibrium, tangency implies that the slope of the budget constraint equals the slope of the indifference curve: Hence,
Consumer equilibrium requires that pf/pog = MUf /MUog or MUf /pf = MUog /pog In words: The marginal utility per dollar of expenditure must be equal for each good.
End of the portion prior to the Group project on the Food Stamps Problem.
Discussion Questions: • Would this analysis make good policy? • What do we know about the behavior of • the poor and how do we know this? • If we would say that giving cash would • make bad policy, is one’s criticism based • on an efficiency argument? An equity • argument? A paternalistic argument?