1 / 10

UWE Bristol Nesli2 analysis: UWEs perspective on how the JUSP could help .

UWE Bristol Nesli2 analysis: UWEs perspective on how the JUSP could help. David Rowe 13/02/2013. Why we do it. To make sure the Nesli2 deal still offers value for money: For example, is cost per full text download under £1.00? Annual housekeeping task.

jillian-fry
Download Presentation

UWE Bristol Nesli2 analysis: UWEs perspective on how the JUSP could help .

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UWE BristolNesli2 analysis: UWEs perspective on how the JUSP could help. David Rowe 13/02/2013

  2. Why we do it • To make sure the Nesli2 deal still offers value for money: • For example, is cost per full text download under £1.00? • Annual housekeeping task

  3. Nesli2 analysis: the process at UWE

  4. Current process – part 1 • Collect spreadsheets from multiple locations • Spreadsheets collected: • JR1/JR1A COUNTER reports • Publisher price lists • Maintain/core subscriptions list • Nesli2 deal title list, with pricing information

  5. Current process – part 2 • Use Vlookups to join up information in Excel: • Core titles • Cost of titlesin the deal if purchased as individual subscriptions • JR1/JR1A: one year’s usage • Rank the titles by usage

  6. Current process – part 3 • Calculate value of the deal • Usage for subscribed and non-subscribed titles • Cost per access • Total list price • Yield

  7. Current process – part 4 • Check the information included is correct; is it comparable to the previous year’s analysis? • Take to the Academic Management Meeting to discuss whether the deal is still offering value for money

  8. Problems with the current process • Version control for the multiple spreadsheets involved in the analysis process • Extremely time consuming • Questions of accuracy of the data used – Core title lists

  9. The future of analysis: using the JUSP • Confidently locate accurate core title lists • Fewer spreadsheets and fewer Vlookups • Less staff time

  10. Other areas of improvement • JUSP and KB+ interoperability • JUSP, KB+ and ELCAT will help the renewal process for all databases and packages, not just Nesli2 deals… That’s the dream, anyway. • More publishers, more data in one place

More Related