1 / 12

Michigan’s state park and forest recreation system: status and future funding

Michigan’s state park and forest recreation system: status and future funding. Dr. Chuck Nelson Dept. Community, Agriculture, Recreation and Resource Studies Michigan State University March 31, 2009. Current Michigan Park System. 98 state park and recreation areas on 285,000 acres

jimbo
Download Presentation

Michigan’s state park and forest recreation system: status and future funding

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Michigan’s state park and forest recreation system: status and future funding Dr. Chuck Nelson Dept. Community, Agriculture, Recreation and Resource Studies Michigan State University March 31, 2009

  2. Current Michigan Park System • 98 state park and recreation areas on 285,000 acres • Clearly signed properties • Clearly defined boundaries • Crown jewels of Michigan purposefully acquired including some from state forest system • 100 campgrounds with 13,000 + sites mostly modern • Other lodging including lodges, cabins, tepees and yurts • 880 miles non-motorized trails • 1% of 6,200 mile designated snowmobile trail system • 0% of 3,107 mile designated ORV trail system • 1 major ORV scramble area • 200,000 acres open to hunting

  3. Current MI State Forest System • 3.9 million acres of state forest • Unsigned properties • Boundaries defined to public by absence of no trespassing signs • ¾ tax reverted lands, 20% hunter dollars, 5% grant programs • 880 miles non-motorized pathways • 242 miles equestrian oriented Shore-to-Shore Riding-Hiking Trail • 142 state forest campgrounds with 2,500 rustic sites • Includes horse trail camps, ORV oriented campgrounds, canoe camps • 73% of 3,107 mile designated ORV trail system • 1 major and two minor ORV scramble areas • 50% of 6,200 miles designated snowmobile trail system • 3.8 million acres open to hunting

  4. Current Funding • General tax dollars once provided for most of the capital improvement and operations funds • Today, those general tax dollars are obligated elsewhere • Medical care for indigant • Welfare • Higher education • Corrections • Other minor uses • State Police, etc. • Less than 1% on Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment • Been eating our “seed corn” in natural resources • Spending almost all funds on operations to run the show, collect revenue • Little on capital improvement, renovation, major maintenance • Catching up to us with deteriorating, dangerous infrastructure

  5. Funding in 2009 • State parks • Camping, motor vehicle entry permit, state oil/gas royalties, state park endowment fund income • No general tax dollars since 2004 • State forests • Motorized trail activities reasonably well funded • ORV license for resident and non-resident • Snowmobile registrations, trail permit (res. and non-res.), state gasoline sales taxes • State forest campgrounds • Camping fees, general fund • State forest non-motorized trails (pathways) • Recreation Improvement Fund (state gasoline sales tax), general fund

  6. Citizens Committee for MI State Parks Proposed Change 11/07 • Eliminate resident motor vehicle permit for MI State Parks • Keep non-resident MVP • Eliminate boating access site motor vehicle permit for MI residents • Keep MVP for non-residents • Replace with a $10 annual fee on each MI car/truck vehicle registration and $5 on motorcycles • Opt out for those who certify they won’t use or support state parks/state forest recreation and don’t support local parks • State park and forest camping fees not effected • Adjust fee annually by MI Consumer Price Index

  7. Revenue • 1/2% of all revenue to Michigan Secretary of State off the top • Replace lost motor vehicle permit revenue • $10.7 million to MI State Park Improvement Fund • $1.03 million to MI Waterways Fund • Then with remaining revenue • 50% to state park infrastructure (State Park Improvement Fund) • 30% to state park operations (State Park Improvement Fund) • 10% to local development grants (protected fund, annual distribution using MNRTF application process) • 7% to state forest recreation operations and infrastructure (Forest Recreation Fund) • 3% DNR cultural and historic resources (State Park Improvement Fund)

  8. Montana Record • 73-75% pay the fee • In place since 2004 • No partnership with forest recreation or local units • Has reduced “cashier” function for state parks • Put more hours/staff into resource management, facility management, interpretation, grounds maintenance, law enforcement, etc. • Very positive public response • Approximately 90% of vehicles who enter MT state parks are in compliance per 2008 study

  9. SB 388/389 & HB 4677/78 to Implement Proposal • Sponsored by Sens. Birkholz and Basham, Reps. Warren and Meekhof and introduced in March 2009 • Identical bills in both chambers • Bi-partisan sponsors in both chambers • Bills are constitutional use of vehicle registration • Is a fee, not a tax • Voluntary, not mandatory due to opt out • Other non-transportation uses of vehicle registration dollars • Specialty plates for MI state universities • Non-game wildlife, agricultural heritage, children’s trust fund, lighthouses • Opt out occurs in single registration transaction • Don’t inconvenience consumers or SOS

  10. Michigan scenario at 65% buy in • Total revenue of $47 million • Less 1/2% for Secretary of State is $46.75 million • Of remaining $46.75 million • $10.7 million to replace lost State Park MVP revenue • $1.03 million to replace lost BAS MVP revenue • Of remaining $35 million • $17.5 million (50%) to state park infrastructure • $10.5 million (30%) to state park operations • Focus on better maintenance, enforcement, interpretation • Focus on rail-trail state parks (e.g. Kal-Haven, FM White Pine, etc.) • $3.5 million (10%) to local unit development grants • $2.4 million (7%) to state forest recreation • $1.0 million (3%) to historic/cultural DNR resources

  11. Benefits • Michigan and Michiganians reap the benefits • Improved infrastructure in MI state parks, forests and local parks • Strengthened state cultural resource base • Improved image for MI as a tourism destination • Stronger MI economy • Convenient, no hassle entry to state parks for all MI registered vehicles • Better managed and maintained state parks and forest recreation opportunities • Better non-motorized trail system • More funding for state park trails, state forest pathways, equestrian trails and blueways • Convenient for non-motorized trail users to finacially support their interests • Local units • Double typical amount of money available for development grants • Use same application as MNRTF, no duplication of effort • Convenient for all local park boosters to support their interests

  12. Conclusion • First joint legislative hearing April 2, 2009 • Opposition from transporation/road interests • Want all vehicle related fees for roads • Opposition from Secretary of State • Don’t want any more work • Support from MI DNR • Support from park and recreation professional organizations • Support from non-motorized trail groups • Support from largest hunter/angler group • Support from tourism industry, local economic development • In crisis is the opportunity for change

More Related