1 / 71

Integrated Disease Surveillance Project (IDSP) Data Management

Learn about IDSP's objectives, reporting units, data collection forms, reporting periodicity, and data analysis. Follow the guidelines for data reporting consistency to ensure effective disease surveillance.

jjackman
Download Presentation

Integrated Disease Surveillance Project (IDSP) Data Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 14-15 July 2011 Integrated Disease Surveillance Project (IDSP) Data Management

  2. Objectives of IDSP Detection of early warning signals of epidemic prone diseases and help to initiate an effective response in a timely manner.

  3. What is a Reporting Unit? A reporting unit is a health facility in private or public sector, located in rural or urban area which collects information of the health conditions identified under IDSP in specified formats and transmits these in pre-specified timely manner to the next higher level.

  4. Public health sector Private health sector Rural SCs, PHC, CHCs Private Clinics / and hospitals Urban Hospitals including IDH, ESI / Railway / Medical college hospitals. Private nursing homes/ hospitals, Medical colleges, Private and NGO laboratories Reporting Health Facilities (Sources of data)

  5. What to be reported ? • Syndromes based Cases • Probable Cases • Confirmed Cases • Outbreaks

  6. Periodicity of Reporting • Weekly ( Monday-Sunday) • Data on outbreaks are collected and analyzed separately and it may be daily/weekly

  7. How to be Reported?IDSP Forms (Weekly: Monday-Sunday) • Form S :For Syndromic Surveillance Filled by Health Worker of Sub centres • Form P : for Presumptive Surveillance Filled at PHC/CHC, Govt. / Private Hospitals, Private Practitioners • Form L : Laboratory Surveillance Filled by PHC/CHC lab, District/ Private lab, State lab, National lab • In addition , EWS/ Outbreak Report is also required FORM SFORM_P L Outbreak Form

  8. IDSP Information Flow

  9. Data Analysis Along with regular and timelycollection of data, the regular and timelyanalysis and interpretationof data is also important otherwise the very purpose of ‘early warning signal & outbreak detection and control of disease burden & disease trend’ gets defeated The Periodicity of analysis: Daily. Weekly ,Monthly, Annual Since the quality of surveillance data depends upon regularity of reports, timeliness and completeness and hence analysis of the data also include assessment of the quality of information

  10. Data Reporting Status through IDSP Portal

  11. SUMMARY OF CURRENT REPORTING STATUS (Jan-June 2011)

  12. State wise Reporting Status of Districts

  13. Districts Reporting- P Form (Priority States)

  14. Reporting percentage increased from 78% to 92% in priority States

  15. Districts Reporting- P Form (Other States-1)

  16. Districts Reporting- P Form (Other States-2)

  17. Reporting percentage increased from 55% to 68% in Other States

  18. Districts Reporting- L Form (Priority States)

  19. Reporting percentage increased from 76% to 90% in priority States

  20. District Reporting- L form (Other States-1)

  21. District Reporting- L form (other States-2)

  22. Reporting percentage increased from 47% to 63% in other States

  23. RUs Reporting- P form (Priority States)

  24. Reporting percentage increased from 52% to 66% in priority States

  25. RUs Reporting- P form (other States-1)

  26. RUs Reporting- P form (other States-2)

  27. Reporting percentage increased from 42% to 47% in Other States

  28. RUs Reporting- L Form (Priority States)

  29. Reporting percentage increased from 52% to 66% in priority States

  30. RUs Reporting- L form (other States-1)

  31. RUs reporting- L Form (other States-2)

  32. Reporting percentage increased from 40% to 49% in other States

  33. Results Monitoring Indicators for Data Reporting

  34. Consistency Report • Timeliness is defined as reports obtained within one week after the last date of every reporting week. Minimum expectation is that each reporting unit reports for at least 40 weeks in a year (52 weeks). • Or 80% of week at any given time under consideration • All identified reporting units must report. • However, for programme purpose, the following definition of consistency may be followed: • A reporting unit is consistent, if it has reported for at least 40 weeks in a year (or >= 80% of week at any given time). • A district is consistent at any given time if at least 80% of RUs under the district reported consistently at that point of time. • A state is consistent at any given time if at least 80% of the district are having consistent reporting RUs.

  35. Grouping for Consistency Report: - Reports should have desegregated forms of • P {1.PHCs, 2. Other Govt. Hospitals (CHC/ID Hospitals/Medical Colleges/Other Premier Institutes/Public Sector Hospitals) and 3. Private hospitals separately} • L (Government and Private Laboratory) and • S reporting units( Sub centres)

  36. Consistency of Reporting

  37. RUs Consistency for P form (Priority States)

  38. Districts Consistency for P Form (Priority States)

  39. RUs Consistency for -L form (Priority States)

  40. Districts Consistency for -L form (Priority States)

  41. SUMMARY OF CURRENT OVERALL AND CONSISTENCY REPORTING STATUS OF 9 PRIORITY STATES (Jan-June 2011)

  42. RUs Consistency for -P form (Other States-1)

  43. RUs Consistency for -P form (Other States-2)

  44. Districts Consistency for -P form (other States-1)

  45. Districts Consistency for -P form (Other States-2)

  46. RUs Consistency for -L form (Other States-1)

  47. RUs Consistency for –L form (Other States-2)

  48. Districts Consistency for -L form (Other States-1)

  49. Districts Consistency for -L form (Other States-2)

More Related