460 likes | 479 Views
This study explores the capabilities and challenges of nanodevices using a unified view and model in the field of molecular and carbon nanotube (CNT) electronics. The research delves into the intricacies of the gate, source, drain, channel, insulator, VG, VD, and I, examining Hamiltonian matrices and molecular electronics at an atomistic level. The text discusses various methodologies and challenges faced, such as self-energy effects, electron densities, and the role of self-consistent fields. Theoretical frameworks, such as quantum chemistry, are also investigated, along with practical applications in nanowires, nanotubes, and molecular sensors. The study bridges disciplines like quantum chemistry and surface physics to provide a comprehensive understanding of molecular electronics and nanotechnology.
E N D
Gate M SOURCE DRAIN CHANNEL INSULATOR VG VD I NEGF Method:Capabilities and Challenges Supriyo Datta School of Electrical & Computer Engineering Purdue University Molecular Electronics CNT Electronics Molecular Sensor
‘s’ Gate H + U M SOURCE DRAIN CHANNEL INSULATOR VG VD I Nanodevices: A Unified View Unified Model Molecular Electronics CNT Electronics Molecular Sensor
‘s’ H + U -t -t -t -t 2t 2t 2t SOURCE DRAIN CHANNEL INSULATOR VG VD I Hamiltonian, [H] Effective Mass Equation Finite Difference / Finite Element Damle, Ren, Venugopal, Lundstrom ---> nanoMOS
‘s’ H + U , are matrices SOURCE DRAIN CHANNEL INSULATOR VG VD I Hamiltonian, [H] Nanowire Electronics Atomistic sp3d basis Rahman, Wang, Ghosh, Klimeck, Lundstrom
‘s’ Gate H + U , are (2x2) matrices Hamiltonian, [H] CNT Electronics Atomistic pz basis Guo, Lundstrom
‘s’ Gate H + U Hamiltonian, [H] Nanowire/CNT Electronics Atomistic non-orthogonal basis EHT Siddiqui, Kienle, Ghosh, Klimeck
‘s’ H + U Hamiltonian, [H] Molecular Electronics Atomistic basis: Huckel / EHT / Gaussian Ghosh, Rakshit,Liang, Zahid, Siddiqui, Golizadeh, Bevan, Kazmi
‘s’ H + U “Self-energy”,
‘s’ gate H + U “Self-energy”,
‘s’ gate H + U “Self-energy”,
‘s’ gate H + U “Self-energy”,
‘s’ [H] H + U [H] “Self-energy”,
‘s’ H + U From molecule to QPC “molecule” Damle, Ghosh PRB (2001)
Quantum Chemistry Surface Physics Surface Physics Bridging Disciplines Basis mixing: Ghosh, Liang, Kienle, Polizzi
C60 on Silicon I II III dI/dV IV I IV II dI/dV III T(E) STS measurements: (a) Dekker, et al., surface science 2002. (b)& (c) Yao, et al, surface science 1996 V (V) Theory: Liang, Ghosh
Molecule on silicon Quantum chemistry Surface Physics Expt:Mark Hersam Nanoletters, 01/04 Cover story Room temperature (a) V = 0 (b) V < 0 (c) V > 0
‘s’ H + U NEGF equations
‘s’ H + U µ1 µ2 Matrices <--> Numbers
“Poisson” N --> U Self- Consistent Solution U --> N SOURCE DRAIN CHANNEL INSULATOR VG VD I Minimal Model U --> I Nanowires / Nanotubes / Molecules
µ1 µ2 INSULATOR CHANNEL W L z x E D(E) FET: Why current “saturates” ? Drain current Drain voltage
‘s’ H + U Self-consistent field, U 3D Poisson solver: Eric Polizzi Method of moments: Jing Guo
‘s’ H + U Self-consistent field, U 3D Poisson solver: Eric Polizzi Method of moments: Jing Guo Correlations
‘s’ H + U Self-consistent field, U Quantum Chemistry: Closed System in Equilibrium U H+U, N
‘s’ H + U Self-consistent field, U Quantum Chemistry: Closed System in Equilibrium U H+U, N
‘s’ H + U Self-consistent field, U Quantum Chemistry: Closed System in Equilibrium U H+U, N
‘s’ H + U Which self-consistent field ? µ
‘s’ H + U Which LDA ?
‘s’ H + U Which LDA ? IP = E(N) - E(N-1) EA = E(N+1) - E(N)
N vs. µ µ N - N0
N vs. µ: SCF Theory µ U0/2 N - N0 Rakshit
Self-interaction Correction µ U0/2 No general method N - N0
11 10 01 00 One-electron vs. Many-electron N one-electron levels 2^N many electron levels
‘s’ H + U 11 10 01 00 Two choices 2^N many electron levels Works for Works for
‘s’ H + U 11 10 01 00 Two choices 2^N many electron levels Works for Works for ? Mott insulator Band theory
‘s’ H + U What is a contact? Klimeck, Lake et.al. APL (1995)
‘s’ H + U What is a contact? Klimeck, Lake et.al. APL (1995)
‘s’ H + U “Hot” contacts Energy has to be removed efficiently from the contacts: otherwise --> “hot” contacts
‘s’ H + U Source Drain “Hot” contacts Venugopal, Lundstrom
‘s’ H + U Source Drain “Hot” contacts Venugopal, Lundstrom
‘s’ H + U Other “contacts”
‘s’ H + U Other “contacts” Hot phonons ?
‘s’ H + U Other “contacts” Hot phonons ? Molecular desorption ?
‘s’ H + U Source Drain Hot “contacts” Hot phonons ? Molecular desorption ?
‘s’ H + U 11 11 10 10 01 01 00 00 Two choices “Contact” State A “Contact” State B Supplement NEGF with separate rate equation for “contact” Rate equation for full system Works for
‘s’ H + U M SOURCE DRAIN CHANNEL INSULATOR VG VD I Summary Unified Model Electronics & Sensing www.nanohub.org Transients? Strong correlations ? “Hot contacts” ? Electrical Resistance: An Atomistic View, Nanotechnology 15 , S433 (2004)
EXPT: Karlsruhe THEORY: Purdue Group (cond-mat/0403401) Experiment vs. Theory Zahid, Paulsson, Ghosh