1 / 12

Assumptions about “Motivation towards crime”

Assumptions about “Motivation towards crime”. Strain theory: motivation from some sort of strain (e.g. blocked opportunity) Learning theory: motivation from delinquent peers Control theory: there is enough natural motivation towards crime No need to “build in” extra motivation.

jlemus
Download Presentation

Assumptions about “Motivation towards crime”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assumptions about “Motivation towards crime” • Strain theory: motivation from some sort of strain (e.g. blocked opportunity) • Learning theory: motivation from delinquent peers • Control theory: there is enough natural motivation towards crime • No need to “build in” extra motivation

  2. Types of Control • Direct Control • Direct punishments, rewards from parents, friends • Indirect Control • Refrain from deviance because you don’t want to risk friends, job, etc. • Internal Control • Good self-concept, self-control, conscience

  3. Travis HirschiCauses of Delinquency • Identified 4 Elements of the Bond • Attachment (emotional element) • Commitment (stake in conformity) • Involvement (in conventional activities) • Belief (in the validity of the law) • Focus here is on indirect controls

  4. Evidence in Favor of Bonds • Attachment • Attachment to parents (wish to emulate, identify with) • Commitment • Grades, educational aspirations • Belief • Neutralizations

  5. Criticisms of Hirschi’s Theory • Delinquents do form relationships • Attachment to delinquent peers or parents increases, rather than decreases delinquency • Which comes first, bonds or delinquency? • Bonds more salient for females, and early in adolescence

  6. Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990) • A General Theory of Crime • Same control theory assumptions • If we are all inclined to be deviant, why conform? • Because most of us develop “self-control” • “Internal control” • Developed by age 8, as the result of “direct control” from parents

  7. Nature of Crime, Nature of Low Self-Control Criminal Acts… Provide immediate gratification of desires Are risky/thrilling Are easy/simple Require little skill/planning Provide few/meager long term benefits Result in pain/discomfort to a victim People with low self-control are therefore… Impulsive Risk-taking Physical (as opposed to mental) Low verbal ability Short-sighted Insensitive

  8. The implications of low self-control • Explains “stability of criminal behavior” • But, how does it explain “aging out?” • Explains all crime and analogous behaviors • Analogous = same “nature” as criminal acts

  9. Patterson Revisited: Revenge of the control theorists Parents supervise and punish deviance • Parenting • Context Child’s Antisocial Behavior Is Patterson a “social learning” or “control” theorist???

  10. Empirical Support • Moderate relationship between low self-control and both crime and analogous behaviors • Holds for both males and females • BUT • Not the “sole cause” of crime • May not explain white collar crimes

  11. Policy Implications • Hirschi’s Social Bond Theory • Target attachment, commitment, belief • Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory • Must focus on early childhood prevention • Train parents?

  12. REVIEW CONTROL VS. LEARNING • Assumptions about motivation (and human nature) • Differences over attachment to “deviant others” • Similarity? • “Direct Controls” are similar to “Mechanisms of Learning”

More Related