1 / 11

Flashbulb Memory

Flashbulb Memory. IB Syllabus Says: Evaluate one theory of how emotion may affect one cognitive process (i.e. How flashbulb memory theory explains the influence of emotion on memory ). Flashbulb memory. Originally described by Brown & Kulik (1977): Exceptionally vivid memories

joanna
Download Presentation

Flashbulb Memory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Flashbulb Memory IB Syllabus Says: Evaluate one theory of how emotion may affect one cognitive process (i.e. How flashbulb memory theory explains the influence of emotion on memory )

  2. Flashbulb memory • Originally described by Brown & Kulik (1977): • Exceptionally vivid memories • Usually of important events with emotional significance • Resistant to forgetting over time • Debate centres on whether they are a special case, or the same as other memories

  3. Flashbulb memory • Typical ‘flashbulb’ events are dramatic, unexpected, shocking • E.g. disasters, deaths of prominent figures (esp. if unexpected), momentous events • World Trade Centre • Kennedy, Princess Diana • Fall of Berlin Wall

  4. Flashbulb memoryThese are the aspects that Brown and Kulick (1977) propose are remembered vividly for flashbulb memories: • Where you were • What you were doing • How you were informed • How you reacted • How others around you reacted • They propose that there is a biological memory mechanism which leads to these exceptionally vivid memories

  5. Flashbulb memory • Surveys about dramatic events: • Brown & Kulik (1977) found US PPs tended to have vivid memories of political assassinations • All PPs good recall of Kennedy, Black PPs better recall of Medgar Evers (civil rights worker) • Shows importance of relevance of the information – culture seems to influence things • Shock, arousal also important (physiological arousal – amygdala)

  6. Neisser (1982) proposed that the enduring nature of FBM is a result of rehearsal and reworking after the event • We use the conventions of storytelling recounting important events – FBMs are just as susceptible to distortion as other memories. • Its difficult to check the accuracy of flashbulb memories – nothing different about them • E.g Neisser himself was sure he was listening to the baseball when pearl harbour was bombed in WWII – but it couldn’t have been possible because it wasn’t in the baseball season

  7. Flashbulb memory • Challenges to concept of FBM: • Neisser & Harsch (1992) compared PPs recall of Challenger disaster after 24 hours and 2 years • Found all accounts had changed over time, some were ‘wildly inaccurate’ 40%

  8. Furthermore, The McCloskey et al. (1988) study also proposes that flashbulb memories are not special memories (see key study)

  9. consistency confidence Diana everyday everyday Diana Imm. 10 weeks Imm. 10 weeks Flashbulb memory • Platania & Hertkorn (1998) – recall for death of Princess Diana

  10. Highly accurate Contained major distortions Flashbulb memory • Squire (2000) – recall of OJ Simpson verdict 100% 50% 0% 1 mo 12 mo 15 mo 3 years

  11. Flashbulb memories • Relatively little evidence for FMBs as a distinct memory process • They ‘feel’ accurate (we are confident in recall) but are just as prone to forgetting & change as other episodic memories

More Related