1 / 52

North East Pacific Time-series Underwater Networked Experiment (NEPTUNE): Power System Design, Modeling and Analysis

North East Pacific Time-series Underwater Networked Experiment (NEPTUNE): Power System Design, Modeling and Analysis. Aditya Upadhye. Outline. NEPTUNE Power system requirements Two design alternatives Version 1 Version 2 Cable analysis Models Simulation results

joanna
Download Presentation

North East Pacific Time-series Underwater Networked Experiment (NEPTUNE): Power System Design, Modeling and Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. North East Pacific Time-series Underwater Networked Experiment (NEPTUNE):Power System Design, Modeling and Analysis Aditya Upadhye

  2. Outline • NEPTUNE • Power system requirements • Two design alternatives • Version 1 • Version 2 • Cable analysis • Models • Simulation results • Conclusions and future work

  3. NEPTUNE

  4. Science requirements • Communication bandwidth - Gb/s • Power – 200kW • Reliability • Robustness of design • Thirty year lifetime • Maintenance and support

  5. Power System Design • Basic tradeoffs • Frequency: ac versus dc • Network: radial versus interconnected • Loads: series versus parallel • Shore station supply at 10kV, 200kW • Max. current-carrying capacity = 10A • User voltage = 400V / 48V • Max. power at each node = 10kW

  6. Power System Design • Protection • Sectionalizing circuit breaker • Breaker control • Monitoring and control • Current – voltage measurements • State estimation • Shore station control hardware / software

  7. Power System Design: Version 1

  8. Version 1 Circuit

  9. DC Circuit Breaker Need • During initial energization • For fault isolation Required features • To force a current zero and minimize arcing • To prevent breaker restrikes

  10. S2 S3 R1 R2 S4 S1 C DC Circuit Breaker Open Circuit

  11. S2 S3 S4 R1 R2 S1 C DC Circuit Breaker Soft Closing

  12. S2 S3 S1 S4 R1 R2 C DC Circuit Breaker Closed circuit

  13. S3 S2 S4 R1 R2 S1 C DC Circuit Breaker Capacitor charging

  14. S2 S3 S4 R1 R2 S1 C DC Circuit Breaker Capacitor discharging

  15. DC Circuit Breaker Hardware prototype • 125V, 5A breaker circuit • Breaker control • MOSFETs drive the switch solenoids • Opto-isolator between logic circuit and driver circuit • Control logic has a counter, which continuously cycles through the breaker operations

  16. DC Circuit Breaker Hardware prototype test results • Continuous Voltage: 125V • Continuous Current: 4.5A • Total Breaker Cycles: 125,000 • Normal cycle switching frequency: 20Hz • Maximum cycle switching frequency: 100Hz • Maximum tested voltage: 200V • Maximum tested current: 5A

  17. Power System Design: Version 2

  18. Version 2 Circuit

  19. Branching Unit

  20. Series Power Supply • Indigenous power supply for each BU • Less reliance on node converter • Use of zener diodes in reverse region • Back-to-back zener diodes

  21. Modes of Operation • Normal • Fault • Fault-locating • Restoration Special case • System startup

  22. Comparison of Version 1 and Version 2

  23. Version 1 Version 2 Conventional approach to power system design Based on the philosophy that cable faults are rare but possible Response to a fault is at the system level by the shore station controls Response to a fault is at the local level by the nearest circuit breaker Circuit breaker is complicated with many components Complexity of circuit breaker is greatly reduced Fault current is interrupted; arcing and restrikes are possible Fault current is not interrupted; arcing and restrikes are not possible Single node failure can cause failure in a large section of the network Single node failure is not catastrophic for the system as that node only will be out of service Reliability is low Reliability is increased

  24. Electromagnetic Transients Program (EMTP)

  25. Alternate Transients Program

  26. ATP Theory • ATP is a universal program system for digital simulation of transient phenomena of electromagnetic as well as electromechanical nature • With this digital program, complex networks and control systems of arbitrary structure can be simulated • Trapezoidal rule of integration

  27. Cable Parameters

  28. ALCATEL OALC4 Cable

  29. Inductance Calculations • The generalized formulae were applied to the OALC4 cable • The core (steel) current caused flux linkages within a) the core b) the sheath c) the insulation • The sheath (copper) current caused magnetic flux linkages within: a) the sheath b) the insulation

  30. Inductance Calculations Where T is the total flux linkage associated with the conductor, i is the flux linkage internal to the conductor, and e is the flux linkage external to the conductor Where icable is the total current in the cable

  31. Results

  32. Simulation Models

  33. t = topen t = (topen-t) t =( topen +t) Switch closed Switch open: initial arcing Capacitor charging Version 1: Opening of Circuit Breaker

  34. RESTRIKE!!! Vmax Initial Arcing Period topen Simulation of Restrikes

  35. Restrikes: Simulation Circuit

  36. Capacitor Current Restrike No Restrike

  37. Capacitor Voltage Restrike No Restrike

  38. Simulation Results

  39. Current Limiting Operation • The shore station power supplies are rated at 200kW, 10kV • The steady-state system current = 10A • Under certain conditions, the system current may increase due to • Cable faults • Topology changes • Load fluctuations

  40. Current Limiting Operation • The system current is limited to a value below 10A using the control circuitry in the shore station • This is done by dropping the shore voltage which in turn reduces the current • The control action is initiated only for steady-state overcurrents and not transient overcurrents.

  41. Fault Analysis

  42. Version1: Simulation Circuit

  43. Results of Current Limiting: Shore Output voltage and Current Voltage Current

  44. Voltage and Current at Node 2: No Current Limiting Voltage Current

  45. Capacitor Current of Node 2

  46. Version 2: Fault Studies • A pre-insertion resistance may be placed at the shore station to limit the fault current • This resistance will limit the fault current before the shore controls take the appropriate mode-dependant control action • Three controllable parameters in simulations: • Value of pre-insertion resistance • Response time of control circuitry • Distance of fault from the shore station

  47. Simulation Circuit X=100km/1200km

  48. Results: Vary Response Time

  49. Results: Vary Fault Distance

More Related