1 / 8

Compare/Contrast Thesis Statements

Compare/Contrast Thesis Statements. Example 1: Combined.

jock
Download Presentation

Compare/Contrast Thesis Statements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Compare/Contrast Thesis Statements

  2. Example 1: Combined While both passages discuss the same subject—the Okefenokee Swamp, Passage 1 objectively portrays the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp and “wildlife refuge”; and Passage 2 subjectively portrays the swamp as a “primeval,” “hellish zoo” through diction, detail, and syntax.

  3. Example 2: Parallel While Passage 1 employs academic diction, factual details, and loose sentence structures to objectively portray the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp and “wildlife refuge,” Passage 2 employs cacophonous diction, undesirable imagery, and periodic sentence structures to subjectively portray the swamp as a “primeval,” “hellish zoo.”

  4. Topic Sentence 1 Passage 1 uses academic diction, which produces a rather technical view of the Okefenokee Swamp; however, Passage 2 employs cacophonous diction, which produces a repulsive view of the swamp.

  5. Topic Sentence 2 Through factual details, Passage 1 offers an objective view of the Okefenokee, while the undesirable imagery of Passage 2 evokes the undesirable, subjective view of the swamp.

  6. Comparative Thesis Statements Combined While both passages discuss the same subject—the Okefenokee Swamp, Passage 1 objectively portrays the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp and “wildlife refuge”; and Passage 2 subjectively portrays the swamp as a “primeval,” “hellish zoo” through diction, detail, and syntax. Parallel While Passage 1 employs concise diction, factual details, and loose sentence structures to objectively portray the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp and “wildlife refuge,” Passage 2 employs cacophonous diction, undesirable imagery, and periodic sentence structures to subjectively portray the swamp as a “primeval,” “hellish zoo.”

  7. Topic Sentence 3 To create an unbiased view of the swamp, Passage 1 employs a loose sentence structure, while Passage 2 creates a somewhat biased view of the Okefenokee Swamp through periodic sentence structures.

  8. Topic Sentencefor a Similarity Both Passage 1 and Passage 2 use figurative language to develop their contrasting characterizations of the Okefenokee Swamp.

More Related