660 likes | 782 Views
Given similarities in climate, why don’t all tropical regions have the same species or, at least, the same types of species, and communities that have the same proportions of primates, birds, reptiles, etc.?. History!.
E N D
Given similarities in climate, why don’t all tropical regions have the same species or, at least, the same types of species, and communities that have the same proportions of primates, birds, reptiles, etc.?
History! In other words, ecological processes (for example, the inability of a taxonomic group to withstand cold temperatures, or competition with a closely related species) can’t explain everything about the distribution and abundance of particular taxonomic groups.
Some groups unique (endemic) to southeast Asian tropics Gibbons Orangutans
African isolation resulted in radiation of mammalian cladeAfrotheria which includes the orders Proboscidea (elephants) Hyracoidea (hyraxes) Macroscelidea (elephant shrews) Tubulidentata (aardvark) Afrosoricida (golden moles and Madagascan tenrecs) Sirenia (dugongs and manatees)
Madagascar primates are lemurs—a unique (endemic) group of primates
Endemic mammals of the Neotropics (New World tropics) Sloths Armadillos Anteaters
Australian mammalian fauna has many marsupials (likely initially evolved in North America) Because many placental mammals either never made it to Australia (except for recent invasives and bats) or didn’t establish a strong foothold, marsupials radiated
Monkeys are common residents of all the world’s rainforests except those of New Guinea and Australia (With the exception of some invasive crab-eating macaques on New Guinea)
Many tropical areas separated from each other between 160 and 50 million years ago, when many present-day taxonomic groups originated Thus the distributions of these taxonomic groups often demonstrate these past geographical relationships
Each geographic region has a unique history, leading to a unique biota
Specific histories—Southeast Asia Composed of several continental blocks that separated from Gondwanaland between 400 and 160 million years ago Exchange of organisms with Indonesia has been increasing as Australia moves northward and Indonesia archipelago continues to form
Specific histories—Africa and Madagascar 160 mya Africa and South America split from the rest of Gondwanaland 105 mya South America and Africa split Africa connected to Asia for the last 20 my but the dry regions of the Sahara and middle East have prohibited exchange of many humid tropical organisms Madagascar has been isolated from Africa for about 90 my
Specific histories--India Over 130 mya Madagascar and India split from Antarctica-Australia 40 mya India fused with Asia
Specific histories—South America 105 mya South America and Africa split. South America split from Antarctica after this date and so was isolated for about 70 my In the last 3 my intermittent archipelagoes have existed between Central and South America
Specific histories—Central America Conglomerate of pieces of land of various ages and origins The Great American Interchange (3 mya—when Central America joined with South America because of the development of land connections) has had a great influence on shaping the region’s biota
Specific histories--Australia 100 mya Australia and New Guinea split from Antarctica and are continuing to move northward Australia and New Guinea should become connected to Asia in about 40 my
Although the climates of the tropical regions have many similarities, history has played a large role in shaping the unique biotas of each region
Mammal faunas of different tropical regions result from different geographical/geological histories and then evolution within tropical environments
The Great American Interchange was an historic phenomenon that shaped North, Central and South American biotas
From 65 to 30 mya, mammals evolved and speciated in South America, both marsupials and placentals
South America’s biota during the Tertiary included Glyptodonts (placental)--hippopotamus-size armadillos Toxodons (placental)--similar to rhinos and hippopotamuses Thylacosmilus--a sabertooth marsupial cat. Pyrotheres (placental)--some similarities to elephants Borhyaenids (marsupials)--resembled dogs, cats, mustelids, and shrews
Panamanian landbridge connected North to South America about 3 mya Great American Interchange occurred
Species from NA that moved into SA Jaguars, peccaries, tapirs, coatis, kinkajous, giant otters, llamas, mastodons
Species from SA that moved into NA Giant sloths, armadillos, possums, glyptodonts, porcupines, anteaters, toxodons
Marsupial cats of SA were replaced by placental cats Toxodons of SA were replaced by tapirs and deer Some unique groups of SA persisted--monkeys, tree sloth, anteaters
50% of mammal species of SA have NA ancestors 10-20% of NA species have SA origins Why?
Hypotheses to explain pattern described on previous slide Northern mammals were better migrators? Northern mammals more prone to speciation? Northern mammals outcompeted Southern mammals? North mammals more tested? South American forms larger?
Refugial hypothesis of Amazonian speciation We’ve been examining historical influences on the scale of millions of year Now we’ll move to thousands of years and the theory that Pleistocene refugia have led to speciation in tropical areas
Idea of Pleistocene refugia first developed by Haffer (1969) The idea was used to explain some of the great species richness of the Amazon—how did so many closely related species evolve?
Haffer’s theory “…during several dry climatic periods (glacial periods) of the Pleistocene and post-Pleistocene, the Amazonian forest was divided into a number of smaller forests which were isolated from each other by tracts of open, nonforest vegetation”. Haffer, J. 1969. Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science 165:99-105
Haffer’s theory “The remaining forests served as "refuge areas" for numerous populations of forest animals, which deviated from one another during periods of geographic isolation”. Haffer, J. 1969. Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science 165:99-105
Hypothesized forest refugia during dry periods of the Pleistocene
Haffer’s theory “The isolated forests were again united during humid climatic periods when the intervening open country became once more forest-covered, permitting the refuge-area populations to extend their ranges”. Haffer, J. 1969. Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science 165:99-105
Haffer’s theory “This rupturing and rejoining of the various forests in Amazonia probably was repeated several times during the Quaternary and led to a rapid differentiation of the Amazonian forest fauna in geologically very recent times”. Haffer, J. 1969. Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science 165:99-105
This theory has not been uniformly accepted and has engendered some other potential theories
The rise and fall of the Refugial Hypothesis of Amazonian speciation: a paleoecological perspective Mark B. Bush; Paulo E. de Oliveira Biota Neotrop. vol.6 no.1 Campinas 2006
Bush and Oliveira reviewed previous palynological (pollen) data to see whether they supported the idea that savannas had separated areas of forest during dry periods.
Very few data exist, given the lack of many lakes, from which to obtain pollen samples, in the Amazon
Pollen diagram from 2013 paper by Velasquez and Hooghiemstra
Pollen diagram in previous slide shows Proportions of different types of plants (for example parano vs. subandean) change with depth of the soil. The deeper the soil, the further back in time. Changes in proportions of different plant types is likely linked to climate changes in the past.
Bush and Oliveira argue that these data may show local changes to savannas during dry periods (more grasses and fewer trees) but not wide-spread changes.
Bush and Oliveira suggest previous data show many grasses existed during Holocene, as well as Pleistocene, but refugia weren’t suggested to be in place in Holocene. Also, they suggest the grasses may only be in local, not regional environment They also say the dry period in the Pleistocene, from 26,000 to 15,000 years before the present, wasn’t sufficient time for speciation
Sites in Ecuador and Brazil have pollen patterns that show cooling during ice ages, but not necessarily the changes in precipitation patterns predicted by the refugium hypothesis
Amazon fan (area in square) acts as a pollen trap for the whole Amazon basin. Pollen data from the fan show about the same proportion of grasses today as in the dry, glacial periods of the Pleistocene. Bush and Oliveira argue that this provides evidence of a lack of grasslands separating forest into refugia during the Pleistocene, because much of Amazon is forested today. Amazon fan