320 likes | 419 Views
ChE 551 Lecture 03. Analysis of Rate Data. General Approach. Initiate reaction measure concentration vs time fit data to calculate rates. Rate Measurements: An Old Topic. Figure 3.1 Wilhelmy’s [1850] measurements of the changes in sucrose concentration in grape juice after acid is added.
E N D
ChE 551 Lecture 03 Analysis of Rate Data
General Approach Initiate reaction measure concentration vs time fit data to calculate rates
Rate Measurements: An Old Topic Figure 3.1 Wilhelmy’s [1850] measurements of the changes in sucrose concentration in grape juice after acid is added.
Many Methods To Do Measurements • Techniques include: conventional, stopped flow, temperature jump… • Differ via time scale of reaction • Need to mix reactants and initiate reaction before reaction is done • Different techniques used for fast reactions than slow ones
How Do You Decide What Experimental Method To Use? Key Issues: • Direct method or indirect method • Can measurement be done on an appropriate time scale?
Direct vs Indirect Methods Recall – rate equation is the rate as a function of the concentrations • Direct method - any method where you actually measure the rate as a function of concentration • Indirect method - a method where you measure some other property (i.e. concentration vs time) and infer a rate equation.
Example: Consider Arsine Doping Of Silicon Figure 3.6 A typical arsine decomposition reactor.
Direct Measurement Figure 3.7 A possible apparatus to examine the decomposition of arsine (AsH3) on silicon.
Indirect Measurement Figure 3.8 Typical batch data for reaction(3.7). Data of Tamaru[1955].
A Comparison Of The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Direct And Indirect Methods Direct Method Advantages • Get rate equation directly • Easy to fit data to a rate law • High confidence on final rate equation Disadvantages • Difficult experiment • Need many runs • Not suitable for very fast or very slow reactions Indirect Method Disadvantages • Must infer rate equation • Hard to analyze rate data • Low confidence on final rate equation Advantages • Easier experiment • Can do a few runs and get important information • Suitable for all reactions including very fast or very slow ones
Other Notation Direct method • differential method • differential reactor Indirect method • integral method
Initial Rate Method • Start with multiple parallel reactors • Fill each with a different concentration • Let reaction go & measure conversion vs time • Get rate from slope extrapolated to zero
Next: Start Analysis Of Data From Indirect Reactors: Which is easier to analyze? • Direct method (rate vs concentration • Indirect method (concentration vs time) Direct is easier to analyze.
Analysis Of Data From A Differential Reactor General method – least squares with rate vs time data Figure 3.10 The rate of copper etching as a function of the oxygen concentration. Data of Steger and Masel [1998].
Pitfalls Of Direct Measurements • It is not uncommon for more than one rate equation may fit the measured kinetics within the experimental uncertainties. • Just because data fits, does not mean rate equation is correct. • The quality of kinetic data vary with the equipment used and the method of temperature measurement and control. • Data taken on one apparatus is often not directly comparable to data taken on different apparatus.
Pitfalls Continued • It is not uncommon to observe 10-30% variations in rate taken in the same apparatus on different days. • Usually, these variations can be traced to variations in the temperature, pressure, or flow rate in the reactor. • The procedure used to fit the data can have a major effect on the values of the parameters obtained in the data analysis. • The quality of the regression coefficient (r2) does not tell you how well a model fits your data.
Example: Fitting Data To Monod’s Law Table 3.A.1 shows some data for the growth rate of paramecium as a function of the paramecium concentration. Fit the data to Monod’s Law: where [par] is the paramecium concentration, and k1 and K2 are constants. (3.A.1)
Fitting Data Continued • There are two methods that people use to solve problems like this: • Rearranging the equations to get a linear fit and using least squares • Doing non-linear least squares • I prefer the latter, but I wanted to give a picture of the former.
Fitting Data • There are two versions of the linear plots: • Lineweaver-Burk Plots • Eadie-Hofstee Plots • In the Lineweaver-Burk method, one plots 1/rate vs. 1/concentration. Rearranging equation (3.A.1) shows: (3.A.2)
Numerical results From the least squares fit, (3.A.3) Comparison of equations (3.A.2) and (3.A.3) shows: k1 = 1/.00717=139.4, K2=1/(0.194*k1)=0.037, r2=0.900
How Well Does It Fit? Figure 3.A.1 A Lineweaver-Burk plot of the data in Table 3.A.1 Figure 3.A.2 The Lineweaver-Burk fit of the data in Table 3.A.1
Why Systematic Error? We got the systematic error because we fit to 1/rp. A plot of 1/rp gives greater weight to data taken at small concentrations, and that is usually where the data is the least accurate.
Eadie-Hofstee Plot Avoid the difficulty at low concentrations by instead finding a way to linearize the data without calculating 1rp. Rearranging equation (3.A.1): rp(1+K2[par])=k1K2[par] (3.A.4) Further rearrangement yields: (3.A.5)
Eadie-Hofstee Plot r2=0.34 Figure 3.A.4 The Eadie-Hofstee fit of the data in Table 3.A.1 Figure 3.A.3 An Eadie-Hofstee plot of the data in Table 3.A.1
r2 Does Not Indicate Goodness Of Fit Eadie-Hofstee gives much lower r2 but better fit to data!
Non-linear Least Squares Use the solver function of a spreadsheet to calculate the best values of the coefficients by minimizing the total error, where the total error is defined by: (3.A.7)
Summary Of Fits Figure 3.A.6 A comparison of the three fits to the data Figure 3.A.5 A nonlinear least squares fit to the data in Table 3.A.1
Comparison Of Fits Note that there is no correlation between r2 and goodness of fit.
Pitfalls Of Direct Measurements • It is not uncommon for more than one rate equation may fit the measured kinetics within the experimental uncertainties. • Just because data fits, does not mean rate equation is correct. • The quality of kinetic data vary with the equipment used and the method of temperature measurement and control. • Data taken on one apparatus is often not directly comparable to data taken on different apparatus.
Summary • Many methods to measure rates • Direct vs indirect • Conventional vs stopped flow vs temperature jump • Direct easier to fit • Caution about using r2
Class Question • What did you learn new today?