140 likes | 239 Views
Successfully Competing for Funding. June 7, 2012. Types of Opportunities. Strategic Fit Relationship Competitive Landscape Differentiators Past Performance. To apply or not to apply. Execution Future Potential Risk Proposal Price. To apply or not to apply. Overview of funding cycle.
E N D
Successfully Competing for Funding June 7, 2012
Strategic Fit • Relationship • Competitive Landscape • Differentiators • Past Performance To apply or not to apply
Execution • Future Potential • Risk • Proposal • Price To apply or not to apply
What do they want/need • Who do they trust • How can you help • Shaping the solution Funder Relationship
The Government Funder Perspective • Fairness of process • Timeliness of decision • Uniformity of process Responding to the RFP
The Response Responding to the RFP
The Strategy • Compliance matrix • Competitive analysis • Win themes Responding to the RFP
The Story • Tell a story • Show the evidence not just tell • Use graphics – for illustration, for space • Write to the evaluators • Scoring • Personal Responding to the RFP
The Structure– example of ACF Section I. Funding Opportunity Description Section II. Award Information Section III. Eligibility Information Section IV. Application and Submission Information Section V. Application Review Information Section VI. Award Administration Information Section VII. Agency Contacts Section VIII. Other Information Responding to the RFP
The Structure Think like an evaluator so use evaluation criteria as your outline, for example: • Need for assistance • Benefit of the project • Statement of Work or Project Plan • Evaluation of that work • Organizational Experience • Personnel Responding to the RFP
Celebrate no matter what • Win and celebrate • Lose • debrief • build relationship • learn • reapply After submission
Next Session – June 21, 2012 • Topic – How this process works with foundations and other non-government funders Julie Jakopic Julie@iLeadStrategies.com 703-201-6004