1 / 21

Why good companies go bad

Why good companies go bad When business conditions change, the most successful companies are often the slowest to adapt. (Donald N. Sull 1999). Session 7 Managing Organizational Change: Strategies Revisited. Topics for Today. Reflections on EIS simulation Strategies for change

Download Presentation

Why good companies go bad

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Why good companies go bad When business conditions change, the most successful companies are often the slowest to adapt. (Donald N. Sull 1999)

  2. Session 7Managing Organizational Change: Strategies Revisited

  3. Topics for Today • Reflections on EIS simulation • Strategies for change • The implementation process • Balanced scoreboard • Why good companies go bad? • Structural inertia • Growth and strategic changes • Conclusions

  4. The implementation process • A series of issues: • Top-down vs. bottom-up • Cultural vs. structural • Intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation • A systematic change program • The importance of implementation

  5. Problems in implementation • Examples • The Smithers example • Police in New York state • Why? • Interests and interpretation • Past experience and interpretation • Competition for attention • Multiple pulling/pushing forces in different directions • Implementation as a continuation of decision making

  6. Balanced scorecard • What is balanced scorecard • Beyond single measure • Generate balanced attention to important aspects • Video • But the experience at a large consumer bank…

  7. Balanced Scorecard at a large consumer bank • The context • The CEO’s intension • The implementation: HRM – regional office – branches • The academic conference • Problems in implementation • Complex system of multiple indicators • Implementation through bureaucracies • Subjective versus objective measures • Lessons –

  8. Implementation with results(Schaffer and Thomson 2000) • Why results-driven, not activity centered? • Keep the eyes on the ball • Discourage symbolic compliance • Push out of the comfort zone • Establish early wins • Provide clear goals and mobilize resources to carry out the change program • Get resources/support ready • Get employees involved • Insert deadlines and demand measurable outcomes

  9. Case study: Lincoln Electric in China

  10. Background • Lincoln Electric as a model of pay for performance • Measurable goals • Intensity of incentive plan • Remarkable results • Does this model work for other industries or other lines of work? • What are the implications for international management?

  11. Questions for discussion • How does LE’s management style and incentive design fit the Chinese context? • What is your view of LE’s efforts in its setup process in China? Would you do anything differently? Why? • What is your recommendation for the next step?

  12. Summary and Conclusion

  13. Question revisited: Why do large, successful companies fail?

  14. The case of Intel • Background: Industry dominance • The changing environment • Multimedia beyond computing chips • Why failure? • Confined to expertise within own company • The change of strategies • From speed to new markets • Challenges from competitors: A.M.D., Microsoft.

  15. Overview of the course Leadership Agents Recipients

  16. Sharing experience: What is your main lesson about managing organizational change?

  17. Why good companies go bad?(Donald N. Sull 1999) • It is not paralysis, not unawareness, not inaction. • The inability to take appropriate action • Active inertia – tendency to follow established patterns of behavior, even when environment changes. • Example: the Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. • Dominant position in the early 1970s • Response to Michelin’s radial tire – old standards • Delay in phasing out bias tires • Lost market shares and dominance in the industry

  18. Sources of active inertia • Structure and interests • Ford’s T-model • Organizational filtering and interpretation • The pooling of experience • Competence trap • In the time of change, past success can become obstacle: • Strategic frames  blinders • Processes  routines • Relationships  Shackles • Values  Dogmas

  19. For mid-level managers • Be clear what role you want to play • Change agent? • Entrepreneurial managers, early adopter, catalyst? • Imitator, follower? • Invest in your social capital • Different networks for different purposes • Mobilize resources • Protect your interests • Build coalitions • Be adaptive • Happiness belongs to optimists!

  20. About final examination • Format of examination: • Essay questions (choose three of four) • Discussion on business scenarios • discussion on key issues/lessons in organizational change • Contents to be examined: • Cases discussed in class • Key readings assigned for reading • Issues discussed in class

  21. Thank you and enjoy the final exam!

More Related