260 likes | 478 Views
Microsoft Research. Ken Hinckley. Microsoft Research. Andy Wilson. Univ. of Calgary. Saul Greenberg. Brown University. Andries van Dam. Hasso-Plattner Inst. Patrick Baudisch. Pottsdam University. DIRECT INPUT. A SHIFT TO . Handhelds Slates Drafting Boards Tabletops
E N D
Microsoft Research Ken Hinckley Microsoft Research Andy Wilson Univ. of Calgary Saul Greenberg Brown University Andries van Dam Hasso-Plattner Inst. • Patrick Baudisch Pottsdam University
DIRECT INPUT A SHIFT TO • Handhelds • Slates • Drafting Boards • Tabletops • Wall Displays • Touch, or Pen.
PAPER NOTEBOOK OBSERVATIONS B1: Tuck the pen, interleave stylus and fingers B2: Hold Clippings while Writing B3: Specific Roles for Pen and Fingers B4: Two-handed actions
Video • Widespread coverage • 200,000 views • search on “deskterity”
What is the logic of the division of labor between pen and touch in interface design?
IF YOU’RE ONLY THINKING ABOUT TOUCH, YOU’RE BLOWING IT.
SENSING POCKET PC • Accelerometer • Proximity • Contact Sensitive Casing • Automatic Screen Rotation, Pick up to Turn On, Hold like Phone to Talk, etc. UIST 2000 Best Paper Award
What is the logic of the division of labor between contact sensing, tilt, and proximityin interface design?
Which “touch” is an intentional touch? When is a “touch” not a touch at all? Can we answer this if we are only thinking about touch?
YOUR MOTHER WAS RIGHT- POSTURE IS IMPORTANT!
IF WE WANT OUR EXPERIENCES TO STAND OUT…
If Metro is the visual design language for the Microsoft experience, then what is the design language for input & interaction?
What is the logic of the division of labor between touch, pen, proximity, motion and postural sensing, and a diverse ecology of devices and form factors?