United States Army Corps of Engineers

1. United States Army Corps of Engineers Association of the United States Army: Annual Meeting 2005 Role of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in Army Basing LTG Carl A. Strock Chief of Engineers and Commanding General, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

2. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HQ Engineer Commands Military Programs $15.4 B Civil Works $6.1 B • 24,000 Personnel • Navigation • Hydropower • Flood Control • Shore Protection • Water Supply • Regulatory • Recreation • 10,000 Personnel • Military Construction • Contingency Ops • Installation Support • International / Inter- • agency Support 9 Divisions • Homeland Security • Environmental • Real Estate 45 Districts 45 Districts Contractors execute 65% of architect-engineer services & 100% of construction Engineer Research and Development Center - Seven Diverse Research Laboratories - $700 M Annual Research Program

3. Yakima Training Center Fort Lewis Vancouver Barracks (USAR) Umatilla Chem Depot Dugway Proving Ground Deseret Chem Depot Sierra Army Depot Fort Carson Tooele AD Camp Parks (USAR) Pueblo Depot Hawthorne AD Iowa AAP Riverbank AAP Presidio of Monterey Fort Hunter Liggett (USAR) Lake City AAP Fort Riley Fort Leavenworth Fort Irwin Fort Leonard Wood Fort Sill McAlester AAP White Sands Missile Testing Center Yuma Proving Ground Pine Bluff Ars Kansas AAP Red River AD Fort Hauchuca Lone Star AAP Louisiana AAP Fort Bliss Fort Polk Fort Hood Fort Sam Houston Camp Stanley Storage Actv Corpus Christi AD USACE Alignment With Installations Northeast Northwest USA Cold Reg Lab Fort Drum Natick R & D Ctr Fort Devens RFTA (USAR) USAG Selfridge Watervliet Ars Fort McCoy (USAR) NWD*/LRD Tobyhanna Army Depot Ft. Hamilton West Point Detroit Ars NAD* Picatinny Arsenal Charles E. Kelly Spt Fac (USAR) Carlisle Barracks Rock Island Arsenal Fort Monmouth Letterkenny AD Aberdeen Proving Ground Fort Dix (USAR) Lima Army Tank Plt Ft Detrick Ft. AP Hill Fort Eustis Adelphi Lab Ctr Fort Monroe Fort Lee Fort Story Radford AAP Walter Reed Blue Grass AD Ft. Meade Fort McNair Fort Myer Fort Knox Southwest Fort Belvoir Holston AAP Fort Bragg Fort Campbell SAD*/LRD MOT Sunny Point Milan AAP Fort Jackson Redstone Arsenal Director Locations NE: Ft Monroe SE: Ft McPherson NW: Rock Island Ars SW: Ft Sam Houston Europe: Heidelberg Pacific: Ft Shafter Korea: Yongsan Fort Gordon Anniston AD Fort McPherson Fort Benning Ft. Gillem Hunter Army Airfield Fort Rucker SWD*/SPD Pacific Fort Stewart Fort Wainwright Ft. Greely Mississippi AAP Southeast POD* Fort Richardson Ft Buchanan, PR Tokyo/Yokohama Akizuki/Kure Zama/Sagamihara Okinawa * = Lead USACE Division 7 LNOs at Regions 23 PM-Fs at Key Installations EuropeNAD Korea POD* Fort Shafter Schofield Barracks Kwajalein

4. $30-40B of Facilities for Restationing of 142,000 soldiers The Execution Challenge Multiple ‘Peaking’ Programs w/Critical Facilities Needs BRAC 05 IGPBS IGPBS MILITARY WORKLOAD Temp Bldgs Army Modular Forces Army Modular Forces Temp Bldgs GWOT Spt

5. DA Guidance Develop a strategy and implementation plan to support the major permanent restationing initiatives that the Army will execute. Overall objective is to provide the ability to establish, reuse/re-purpose facilities with minimum lead-time, leverage private industry standards and practices, and to reduce acquisition/lifecycle costs … Nov 2004

6. Why MILCON Transformation? • Current standards/processes do not support the Army’s requirement of getting quality facilities in the timeframe needed • Status-quo will most likely result in a program-wide funding shortfall

7. MILCON Strategy Goals • Deliver quality facilities in less time and at lower costs • Provide permanent MILCON solutions to eliminate requirement and use of temporary facilities • Construct adaptable facilities for the long term • Achieve lower O&M costs thru sustainable facilities • Streamline acquisition strategy

8. MILCON Transformation • Execute MILCON as a program, not individual projects • Support Master Planning • Adapt new criteria and processes • Standardize Facilities’ Criteria • Partnering “Faster, Better, Cheaper, and Greener solutions”

9. Execute MILCON as a Program • Program entire Brigade Combat Team (BCT) requirements as one project • Gain economy of scale thru consolidating requirements installation-wide and/or regionally

10. Support Master Planning • Teamed with IMA to increase master planning competency within the Army • Supplemented in-house master planning capability with A-E support • Created military construction project templates (DD1391) for light, heavy and aviation BCT configurations • Teamed with ACSIM/IMA for Planning Charrettes and in development of quality DD1391s “Success requires quality planning and programming”

11. Criteria and Processes • Standardize functional and technical criteria for facilities • Incorporate reuse and repurposing capabilities throughout the facility life cycle • Achieve consistency • Streamline acquisition time • Focus on end result; not “how to” • Adopt industry best practices and proven solutions to get facilities on the ground faster • Pre-engineered alternatives • Fast-track design/build

12. Partnering • Internal (Army) • Synchronize execution with Army needs • Develop consistent DD 1391s • Address real estate actions • Complete NEPA in a timely manner • Ensure sufficient master planning competency • External • Team with Private Sector • Adopt industry best practices • Develop trust thru long-term relationships

13. MILCON Transformation Implementation Plan Execute FY06 BRAC construction using • Fast-track design/ build approach • Standardized Request for Proposal packages using performance based criteria • Pre-manufactured/engineered solutions • Established regional construction contracts • Established “GSA –like” preferred provider schedules • “Adapt – build” for Army BRAC and MILCON construction

14. “One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable”