590 likes | 1.42k Views
Brief History of the Physical Exam. 1550 BCEgyptian physicians describe inspection, palpation, percussion in hieroglyphs400 BCHippocrates describes the succusion splash in pleural effusion1819 ADLaennec (inventor of the stethoscope) publishes
E N D
1. Physical Exam Pearls:Evidence based exam
Karen McDonough MD
Assistant Professor, General Internal Medicine
2. Brief History of the Physical Exam 1550 BC Egyptian physicians describe inspection,
palpation, percussion in hieroglyphs
400 BC Hippocrates describes the succusion
splash in pleural effusion
1819 AD Laennec (inventor of the stethoscope) publishes “Treatise on the Disease of the Chest”
1885 AD Osler describes the protean exam findings of SBE
1950s AD The “Golden Age” of the cardiac exam
3. 2008 AD SKIP THE PHYSICAL EXAM, AND GET A PAN-MAN SCAN …AND A BUNCH OF LABS!!
4. Ideal Physical Exam Technique Straightforward to learn and perform
Used in guiding evaluation and management common problems
Sensitive enough to rule out disease if absent OR
Specific enough to rule in disease if present
5. Likelihood ratios
Positive LR refers to the presence of a physical sign – the bigger the number, the more helpful the sign
Negative LR refers to the absence of a physical sign – the closer to zero, the more helpful the sign
6.
For mid-range pre-test probability:
+LR 1 doesn’t help -LR 1 no help
+LR 2 increases 15% -LR 0.5 decreases 15%
+LR 5 increases 30% -LR 0.2 decreases 30%
+LR 10 increases 45% -LR 0.1 decreases 45%
7. Figure out ahead of time which exam findings will substantially help you in evaluating patients you commonly see, and remember those exam findings.
9. LE Edema in Ascites Patient with suspected ascites – 50/50
Physical finding: LE edema
Positive LR: 3.8
Negative LR: 0.2
10. Graph
11. Graph
12. Same patient… You check for a fluid wave
Positive LR 5.0
Negative LR 0.5
13. Graph
14. Graph
15. In abdominal distention… Argues FOR ascites
+ fluid wave (LR 5.0)
+ edema (LR 3.8)
+ shifting dullness (LR 2.3)
Argues AGAINST ascites
- edema (LR 0.2)
- flank dullness (LR 0.3)
- shifting dullness (LR 0.4)
16. Case #1 A 22 year old woman presents for an annual exam. She has a 2/6 systolic murmur along the left sternal border.
Should we order an echo???
17. Telling systole from diastole At HR < 100, systole is much shorter than diastole
At the left upper sternal border, S2 is louder than S1
Time the cardiac cycle to the carotid pulse – the carotid upstroke occurs after S1, during systole
18. Systolic Murmurs Broad differential: AS, MR, TR, HCM, ASD, VSD, PS, increased blood flow in anemia, fever, pregnancy, hyperthyroidism, or “innocent”
Present in 5-52% of young adults
>90% have normal echocardiograms
Present in 29-60% of older persons
>50% have no clinically significant valvular disease on echo
19. Innocent or Functional Murmur Short, early or midsystolic
2/6 or less
Localized to left sternal border
Normal neck veins, pulses, apical impulse and S1/S2
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy should be ruled out by exam
Should also ensure negative history and ROS for cardiac sx
20. Accuracy of exam in identifying “normal” and “abnormal”murmurs Murmurs meeting above exam criteria
LR of valvular heart disease 0.3
(negative hx should decrease likelihood further)
Murmurs not meeting above criteria
LR of valvular heart disease 38
21. Graph
22. Graph
23. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Uncommon cause of systolic murmur
Causes sudden death in young athletes
SO…you don’t want to miss it
24. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Unlike most other systolic murmurs,
HCM should get LOUDER with decreased venous return because the walls of the left ventricle come closer together
WAYS TO DECREASE VENOUS RETURN
Valsalva x 20 sec (+) LR 14.0 (-) LR 0.3
Squat to stand (+) LR 6.0 (-) LR 0.1
25. HCM Unlike other systolic murmurs,
HCM should get SOFTER with increased venous return because the LV walls are farther apart
WAYS TO INCREASE VENOUS RETURN
Stand to squat (+) LR 7.6 (-) LR 0.1
Passive leg (+) LR 9.0 (-) LR 0.1
elevation
26. Graph
27. Graph
28. Case #2 A 62 year old man presents with 2 months of dyspnea on exertion. He used to be able to push his cart around Costco; now he is barely able to push it up the ramp.
29. Chronic Dyspnea 2/3 cardiac or pulmonary
CHF
COPD
Asthma
Atypical angina
Restrictive lung disease
Pleural effusion
1/3 other
Anemia
Deconditioning
Kyphoscoliosis
30. CHF + LR - LR
+ abdominojugular 8 0.3
Apical impulse lateral to MCL 6 NS
S3 6 NS
Elevated JVP 4 NS
Crackles NS NS
Edema NS NS
31. Measuring JVP
32. Teaching MSIIIs: Jugular vs Carotid Most prominent in descent
Not palpable
Erased by pressure
Usually two pulsations per cycle
Inspiration = more visible
Most prominent in ascent
Palpable
Not erased by pressure
Only one pulsation per cycle
Inspiration = no change
34. When will I REALLY use JVP in internship? Determining adequacy of fluid resuscitation
Assessing low urine output
Deciding on today’s diuretic dose in CHF or volume overload
Assessing an acutely short of breath patient
35. Abdominojugular test Midabdominal pressure for 10 seconds
Positive test = sustained rise in CVP > 4 cm
Positive test indicates elevated left atrial pressure with
+ LR 8.0
- LR 0.3
36. Apical impulse Palpable apical impulse in one-third of adults when supine and 50% in L lateral decubitus
In supine patient , apical impulse lateral to MCL supports CHF as the diagnosis with LR 6.
38. Diastolic sounds: S3&S4 S3 –rapid early diastolic filling
Normal people under 40
Elevated left atrial pressure
For CHF + LR 6
S4 – atrial contraction pushing blood into a stiff and non-compliant ventricle
Not heard in atrial fibrillation
Occurs in HTN, AS, CAD
For CHF – LR NS
39. COPD Spirometry is more sensitive for early COPD; most exam signs identify more severe disease
Not all smokers who are short of breath have COPD
40. COPD + LR - LR
Subxiphoid PMI 7 NS
Any unforced wheeze 6 NS
Breath sound score
< 9 10 --
10-12 4
> 15 0.1
41. Breath sound score Listen at 6 sites – bilateral
Anterior apices
Midaxilllae
Posterior bases
Score breath sounds at each site
Absent 0
Barely audible 1
Faint but audible 2
Normal 3
Loud 4
42. COPD Does patient have 2/3 of
Tobacco use > 70 py
Self described hx of emphysema or chronic bronchitis
Decreased breath sounds
+ LR 25
- LR 0.3
43. Commonly missed uncommon cause of chronic dyspnea Pulmonary hypertension
Especially in young women
Findings
Elevated JVP
Loud P2
RV heave
RV S3
In RV failure – wide split S2
44. Quick Quiz
45. Case #3 A 34 year old woman presents to the clinic with a 3 day history of productive cough. She is concerned about the possibility of pneumonia.
46. Findings supporting pneumonia + LR - LR
Egophany 4 NS
Bronchial breath sounds 3 NS
Dullness to percussion 3 NS
Decreased breath sounds 2.3 0.8
Crackles 2.0 0.8
Temperature > 37.8 2.2 0.7
HR > 100 1.6 0.7
47. Pneumonia Diagnostic Score Temperature > 37.8
Heart rate > 100
Crackles
Decreased breath sounds
Absence of asthma
48. 0 or 1 point LR 0.3
2 or 3 points NS
4 or 5 points LR 8.2
49. This patient has a temp of 38.2, decreased breath sounds and crackles at the right base, and no history of asthma.
Her score is 4, LR of pneumonia is 8.2.
A CXR shows a RLL infiltrate. You start her on azithromycin, and schedule follow up the next week.
50. 3 days later… She returns, still feeling sick.
On exam, her temp is 37.9, HR is 88, RR is 20 and O2 sat is 94% on RA.
She has markedly decreased breath sounds at the right base, but no audible crackles.
51. What are the possibilities?How will you tell them apart?
52. Consolidation Effusion
Decreased BS yes yes
Dull to percussion yes yes
Tactile fremitus increased decreased
Bronchial BS maybe no
Egophany maybe maybe at top
Crackles maybe maybe at top
Pectoriloquy maybe no
53. Case #4 A 68 year old man with a history of tobacco use and knee arthritis presents with 3 months of pain in his right thigh when he walks.
54. Leg Symptoms in PAD Consecutive patients diagnosed with PAD in vascular lab
Only 150/460 patients with PAD (ABI < 0.9) had typical claudication
Other exertional leg symptoms in 131 pts
Leg pain on exertion AND rest in 88 pts
No leg pain but no exertion in 28 pts
ABI similar in all groups ( ~ 0.6 – 0.7)
56. Pedal pulses In normal people
3-14% do not have palpable DP
0-10% do not have palpable PT
BUT if one is absent in someone without PVD, the other makes up for it
The absence of both pedal pulses has LR of 14.9 for PVD
57. What if you suspect PVD, but one or both pedal pulses is PRESENT? (-) LR of 0.3 for PVD
Some patients with PVD will have palpable pedal pulses – with exercise, most will go away
58. OTHER EXAM FINDINGS Bruit LR 7.9
Foot wounds/ulcers LR 7.0
Absent femoral pulse LR 6.1
Asymmetric cool foot LR 6.1
59. NOT SO HELPFUL EXAM FINDINGS Prolonged capillary refill time (LR 1.9)
Atrophic skin (LR 1.7)
Hairless (LR 1.7)
60. Ankle Brachial Index Normal 1.0-1.2
Claudication 0.5-0.9
Rest pain <0.5
Gangrene <0.2