1 / 5

Critique:

Critique:. Well integrated in local community A holistic service Provides better healthcare access – removing barriers Deals with ‘upstream’ issues, although is essence a ‘downstream’ initiative Limited space due to limited funding. …cont. Evaluated and monitored by:. Board of Trustees

john
Download Presentation

Critique:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Critique: • Well integrated in local community • A holistic service • Provides better healthcare access – removing barriers • Deals with ‘upstream’ issues, although is essence a ‘downstream’ initiative • Limited space due to limited funding

  2. …cont. Evaluated and monitored by: • Board of Trustees • Clients • So?... More responsive to local need but doesn’t have to operate within government frameworks

  3. Challenges: • Small NGO • Funding • Changes to benefits • The ‘hidden’ homeless of Winchester • Ex-offenders

  4. Conclusion: • Invaluable service to the community • Liable to suffer due to instability of the economy

  5. Relevant Policies: • Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation (DH 1999) • More than a Roof: A Report into Tackling Homelessness (2003) • The Supporting People Initiative (2003) • Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review (UCL 2010) • Inclusion Health improving primary care for socially excluded people (DH 2010) • Vision to End Rough Sleeping: No Second Night Out Nationwide (DCLG 2011)

More Related