110 likes | 178 Views
Biostratigraphy. Comparing Rock and Time units. Larger units are built from smaller ones Eg, stages are defined by the zones in them. We define bottoms only If you define bottoms AND tops, one boundary has two definitions that may not coincide.
E N D
Larger units are built from smaller ones • Eg, stages are defined by the zones in them. • We define bottoms only • If you define bottoms AND tops, one boundary has two definitions that may not coincide.
Why aren’t biostrat correlations true time correlations? • Are you looking at last appearance or unconformity? • Facies dependence: facies are time-transgressive • Regional speciation & extinction • Shifting climate zones/biogeographic provinces
Other challenges • Preservation problems • Poorly preserved organisms and less abundant organisms are unlikely to be found • Signor-Lipps effect: poorly preserved and less abundant species appear to go extinct earlier than they actually do. • Lazarus species – apparently come back from the dead because they weren’t preserved in between two occurrences • Zombie species - appear above their extinction because they were exposed by erosion and reworked, then deposited in younger sediment
What makes a good index fossil? • Abundant • Facies independent (planktonic, nektonic) • Easily preserved and collected • Widely distributed (global if possible) • Short species life (rapidly evolving) • Easily identified • Best organisms: forams, rads, ammonites, graptolites, pollen, nannofossils • But zones are defined for less-than-ideal organisms, e.g., dinosaurs, clams, conodonts, trilobies
Quantitative Biostratigraphy • Uses a wider range of data than appearance/disappearance: • Abundance peaks • Ratios of species • Based in sophisticated statistics • Correlation analysis (matches patterns of peaks) • Cluster analysis – makes groups for assemblage zones