230 likes | 245 Views
This technical overview discusses the findings related to broadband wireless technology, specifically Wi-Fi, mesh networks, and their applications in urban settings. The document explores the current state of wireless deployments for public safety, inspections, and other municipal services, highlighting the need for robust wireless applications to meet growing demands. The text delves into the speed comparisons of various wireless technologies and the proliferation of Wi-Fi client devices. Real-world examples from cities like Mountain View, CA, and Oklahoma City demonstrate successful implementations of wireless broadband for enhancing public services. The document concludes with next steps for implementing wireless broadband infrastructure, including legal considerations, technology assessments, and cost analysis in a cooperative county environment.
E N D
COUNTYWIDE WIRELESS BROADBANDTechnical Overview & Findings Hannes Zacharias Deputy County Manager
Topics • What is Broadband Wireless (Wi-Fi)? • What is “Wi-Fi Mesh”? • Who is doing Wi-Fi? • Johnson County Activities to Date • Preliminary Study Findings • Next Steps
What is Broadband Wireless? • Bringing Wireless Communications – Outside • Public Safety • Police • Fire • Building Inspection • Restaurant Inspection • Public Works Inspection • Parks Inspection
Up to Now • Voice/radio • Reliable Deployments • No data (or minimal) • Has suited needs well and will continue to in some form
Wireless Business Needs • AVL • Meter reading • Parking enforcement • Dispatch • GIS / Mapping • Property appraiser • Code enforcement • Video surveillance • 1st responders • VoWiFi • Mug shots • Broadband • Events • Amber Alerts • E-justice • Sensors • Freight REALITY • Not enough bandwidth • ‘Mobile Office’ is elusive Robust Wireless Apps MISSING LINK
Wi-Fi Speed (1MB Download) 7 MIN 7 SEC LEGACY RDLAP GPRS 5 MIN 41 SEC 1xRTT 1 MIN 57 SEC CELLULAR EDGE 1 MIN 1 SEC 20.48 SEC EV-DO 5.46 SEC 802.11b WI-FI 0.37 SEC 802.11g
Real World EV-DO Wi-Fi File Size = 1 MB Average Data Rates EV-DO 400 kbps 802.11g 22 Mbps
Wi-Fi Proliferation Wi-Fi Client Shipments 100 2004: 1,000+ devicesWiFi certified 90 80 2003: Wireless integrated ontoPC motherboard; Wireless device proliferation: laptops, PDAs, video cameras, etc. 70 60 50 2002: Wireless NIC: <$60 40 Wi-Fi Client Devices (millions) 2001: HP, Dell, IBM,Toshiba offer built-in wirelessWireless NIC: $100 30 20 1999: IEEE 802.11b (“Wi-Fi”) standard adopted;Wireless NIC: $200 10 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003* 2004* 2005* • 150M Wi-Fi devices: 2005 • 12.5M shipped per month • Has become the “Ethernet” wireless • Intel marketing giant • Mass integration
What is Mesh? • Radio “talks” to another directly over the air forming adjacencies
Pole Mount Wi-Fi Radio Close-Up of Pole Mounting
Wi-Fi in Action - No Boundaries Entering Overland Park Entering Lenexa
City of Philadelphia • 135 square miles • Primary mission was to bridge the Digital Divide • Widely publicized • City Open Access Model was original plan • Completely outsourced to 3rd party based on RFP
Oklahoma City • 600 square miles • Police, Fire, EMS • Homeland Security • Part of general security overhaul (CAD, CRM, etc) • Fixed and mobile nodes • Broadband application access, voice and video • Funding • Tax • Grants
Mountain View, CA • 12 sq mi • Completely outsourced • NO RFP • FREE Wi-Fi Internet • 300kbps • VLAN for city use • Experiment for Google • hometown
Starting to be built… • These collaborative networks are being built • Philadelphia, PA • Tempe, AZ • San Francisco, CA • Mountain View, CA • Oklahoma City, OK • Chaska, MN • Moorehead, MN • St. Cloud, FL • Miami Beach, FL • Milwaukee, WI • New York, NY • Minneapolis, MN • Denver, CO • Houston, TX • Nashville, TN • St. Charles County, MO • Akron, OH • Sacramento, CA • etc…etc…etc…
Activities To Date • Summer 2005 • Wi-Fi Partnering Opportunity Identified • Fall 2005 • Exploratory Meeting • Established Steering Committee • Winter 2005 • Conducted preliminary Review • Presented Findings to • City Managers • Council of Mayors • Cities
Steering Committee • Bob Boyd Manager, Johnson County ITS Technical Services • Jack Clegg Director, Johnson County ITS • Vicki Irey Director, Overland Park ITS • Chris Kelly Director, Olathe ITS • Tim Mulcahy Director, Johnson County JIMS • John VanNice Director, Lenexa ITS • Walt Way Director, Johnson County Emergency Communications • Hannes Zacharais Deputy County Manager, Johnson County
Overall Findings • Most users are urban • Most robust solutions should focus there • All have needs for high bandwidth (>1MB) • Metro Wi-Fi is the clear solution but is too complex and costly to deploy and operate • Mission critical users require multiple network alternatives • Private sector hedge • Many assets available that are valuable to 3rd party wireless providers • Countless numbers of unique applications • AMR, ITS, GIS, GPS, asset tracking, remote surveillance……..endless • Cooperative County Environment
Next Steps • Submit RFP for Consultant Services • Approve Cooperative Agreement between Cities and County • Research Legal Issues • Perform Study • Develop Requirements • Technology Infrastructure Assessment • Business Model Review • Public/Private Process • Utility • Cost/Financing