240 likes | 407 Views
Overview of the Guidelines and Requirements for the Candidate Solutions. Anthony Hollingsworth & Johannes Kaiser. Anthony Hollingsworth apologises for his absence on Tuesday, which is due to a visit of Mr. P. Weissenberg to ECMWF. Overview of Presentation.
E N D
Overview of the Guidelines and Requirements for theCandidate Solutions Anthony Hollingsworth & Johannes Kaiser
Anthony Hollingsworth apologises for his absence on Tuesday, which is due to a visit of Mr. P. Weissenberg to ECMWF.
Overview of Presentation • Introduction: Objectives, Study Logic, … • System Layout • Data Flow Characterisation • 2nd Workshop Conclusions • Questions for Today and Tomorrow
HALO – GMES Specific Support Action (SSA) Marine Services Emergency Response Land Monitoring Global Land Monitoring Security Atmospheric Services • Harmonised coordination of Atmosphere, Land and Ocean integrated projects of the GMES backbone (project lifetime: 1/2/2004 – 1/1/2007) • GMES Fast-Track Pilot Services to be operational from 2008 • Marine Services (IP MERSEA follow-up) • Land Monitoring (IP GEOLAND-Europe follow-up) • Emergency Response (IP RISK-PREVIEW follow-up) • Proposed GEMS Fast-Track Pilot Services to be operational from 2009 onwards • Atmospheric Services (IP GEMS follow-up) • Global Land Monitoring (IP GEOLAND-Global follow-up) • Security • HALO aims at formulating agreed recommendations to GAC and IPs • Scientific thematic analysis of links: • Direct product exchange • Unaccomplished data demands • Common data • Coordinated solutions to infra-structure in operational mode • Candidate solutions by Alcatel and Astrium HALO
GMES Fast-Track Pilot Services and HALO Aim of HALO: “Optimising the efficiency of interaction the Atmosphere, Ocean and Land segments by formulating agreed recommendations to A - L - O IPs and GMES steering groups in areas of” Scientific thematic analysis and coordination Coordinated solutions to shared problems Recommendations to the transition to operational status Definition of Infrastructure Candidate Solutions Marine Services Emergency Response Land Monitoring HALO Global Land Monitoring Security Atmospheric Services
Iterative Development of the Guidelines (=Requirements) MERSEA IP Initialisation of Guideline 1 GEMS IP GEOLAND IP Guideline consolidation 2 3 Data flow characterisation Definition of candidate 4 solutions
Progress of the Candidate Solution Definition 2004 Reports: “ECMWF’s data and products for GMES” “geoland data and products for GMES” “MERSEA data and products for GMES” “GEMS data and products for GMES” 2005 Reports: “Interacting parts of GEMS, MERSEA and geoland: Data, products and infrastructure” “HALO Guideline” 2005/2006 Draft Report: “Infrastructure candidate solutions overview” What data flows are expected? draft discussed at 2nd Workshop and updated afterward
Chief Objectives of this Meeting • Project-internal Agreement on • which candidate solutions shall be assessed, • advantages and disadvantages of each, • which one HALO shall recommend.
Current System of IPs (2006) Model NWP Assim. UK-metoffice NWP Retrieval OLF Data Mer TOPAZ FOAM MFS cator RT link CSP ONC GEMS Off -line NER m-f Cor CLS link SC CMS iolis OFM ECMWF Geoland GEMS Satellite Agencies In-situ MERSEA
Data Categories used in the HALO Reports • categories of exchange • internal: within one IP • interacting: between two IPs • external: between an IP and a third party • observation categories • in-situ • satellite-based • delivery mode • real-time / near-real time • regular • on-demand / offline
In-Situ Providers for GEMS • CarboEurope, NOAA-CMDL, FLUXNET, ALE-GAGE-AGAGE, WDCGG data centre, WMO/GAW, WOUDC, DWD, SHADOZ, MOZAIC, DLR, IPSL, NILU, NDSC, EMEP, NILU, IMPROVE, AERONET, PHOTONS, WDCA, Brewer network, NUIG, ARM, SIRTA, NJKDSC, BSRN, SURFRAD, NASA, HELCOM, OSPAR, CREATE, DAEDALUS, GMES-GATO, Met-Monieur, AIRBASE, … • Is there a role for WIN and ORCHESTRA?
Selected Conclusions on Infrastructure Candidate Solutions • need description of two alternative technical solution candidates • one using the existing meteorological network, ie GTS • another EUMETCast • Does WIS encompass both GTS and EUMETCast? • compare the two solutions: • commonalities and differences • advantages and limitations • Data policy implications of the two solution candidates shall be pointed out. • an additional HALO meeting to decide on a solution recommendation • separate the discussions of solutions for the operational real-time data flow and for the data access for time-lagged products like reanalyses.