1 / 24

Wire grid polarizer test : (1) reference results Jinseok Ko and Steve Scott DNB Meeting

Wire grid polarizer test : (1) reference results Jinseok Ko and Steve Scott DNB Meeting June 6, 2005. motivation. MSE angle (deg). Major R (cm). LED array. along DNB line. “uwg” test setup. wire side. glass side. (unpolarized) collimated LED. detector. rotational polarizer.

jolene-rasmussen
Download Presentation

Wire grid polarizer test : (1) reference results Jinseok Ko and Steve Scott DNB Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Wire grid polarizer test : (1) reference results Jinseok Ko and Steve Scott DNB Meeting June 6, 2005

  2. motivation MSE angle (deg) Major R (cm) LED array along DNB line

  3. “uwg” test setup wire side glass side (unpolarized) collimated LED detector rotational polarizer wire grid polarizer

  4. “ugw” test setup wire side glass side (unpolarized) collimated LED detector rotational polarizer wire grid polarizer

  5. with various reference transmission axes (“rta”) 90 180 0 For various reference transmission axis between 0 to 180 (0, 1, 5, 10, … , 89, 90, 91, … 170, 180)

  6. analytic predictions giving different aoi air “aw” air coating air glass “acw” “agw” air coating glass air glass coating “acgw” “agcw”

  7. “ugw” test setup wire side glass side (unpolarized) collimated LED detector rotational polarizer wire grid polarizer

  8. observations • Measurement shows • (1) parabolic behavior consistent with the prediction • (2) linear behavior (presumably) due to systematic errors • “uwg” configuration results more match “acgw” (or “agw”) predictions • “ugw” configuration results more match “aw” prediction • (which is confusing… : need to check the surface again) • “ugw” configuration shows larger polarization angle variations, that is, linear • components than “uwg”, implying a difference in the systematic error between • two configurations • This data set will serve as a reference for future tests future tests • “u” + blank glass + “wg” • “u” + blank glass + “gw” • “uwg”, “ugw”, “ubwg”, “ubgw” with tilting angle variations • Same tests with a dichroic (plastic) polarization sheet

More Related