1 / 13

Team 3 Adaptive Cruise Control

Team 3 Adaptive Cruise Control. Outline. Reintroduction Feasibility Engineering Analysis Design Norms Major Obstacles Overcome Obstacles Yet to Overcome Decisions Significant Changes. Team 3: Members. Erik Barton Nate Barker Nate Sportel Bryan Bandstra Chris Vonk.

jonah-gibbs
Download Presentation

Team 3 Adaptive Cruise Control

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Team 3Adaptive Cruise Control

  2. Outline Reintroduction Feasibility Engineering Analysis Design Norms Major Obstacles Overcome Obstacles Yet to Overcome Decisions Significant Changes

  3. Team 3: Members Erik Barton Nate Barker Nate Sportel Bryan Bandstra Chris Vonk

  4. Our Project • Design an Adaptive Cruise Control System • Safer Cruise Control System • Decrease driver irritation and frustration • Accomplishes these goals by detecting speed and distance of car ahead

  5. Feasibility • Budget Feasibility: All Parts donated • Radar - TRW • NeoVi - Johnson Controls • LCD/Touch Screen, PLC, Laser - Highlight Industries • DE2 Board - Calvin • Dyno (for testing) • Chrysler Sebring - Bryan Bandstra

  6. Feasibility • Market Feasibility • Real Examples: Jaguar, Mercedes • Conclude there is a need and a market • Technical Feasibility • Assured by JCI experts • Group Members with experience with parts

  7. Meeting with JCI: system design Research of Bus System CAN, J1850 NeoVi card solution Did Calculations of Speed, distance, maximum angle Safe driving distance Turn radius Speed max and min Decision Matrices Engineering Analysis

  8. Transparency Stewardship Justice Caring Trust Humility Design Norms

  9. Obstacles Overcome • Acquired all necessary parts!!! • Radar eliminates the need for prototype alternatives • Bus system compatibility

  10. Obstacles Still Remaining • Turns/Hills Issues • Programming • Getting all parts to work together as a full system • Installing into a specific car • FCC licensing • Applied for but not yet acquired

  11. Decisions • LCD/Touch Screen • Radar • DE2 Board • Speed Range (50 to 80 mph) • Following Distance (3 seconds) • Warning using LCD and Sound • No Brakes

  12. Significant Changes • Use of DE2 board instead of PLC • More digital options • Faster • Acquisition of Parts

  13. QUESTIONS?

More Related