E N D
1. 1 Legal Aspects CIPS Graduate Diploma
Core Module
2. 2 Law of Tort Law of Tort - harm or wrong
Based on fault:
Intentional
Reckless
Negligent
3. 3 The ‘but for’ law Causal link - ‘but for’ test
The loss would not have occurred ‘but for’ the defendants conduct
McWilliams v Sir William Arnold Ltd 1962
4. 4 Vicarious liability An employer may be vicariously liable for the conduct of an employee.
5. 5 Vicarious liability Limpus v London Omnibus Co 1862
Driver racing!
Beard v London Omnibus Co 1900
Conductor decides to drive the bus
6. 6 Employer paying out under vicarious liability has the right of full indemnity against the employee
Lister v Romford Ice and Storage Co Ltd. 1957
7. 7 Lister v Romford Ice and Storage Co Ltd. 1957
Son drives van into his father - negligently. Father sues the company Romford.
Romford then sued the Son, an employee for reimbursement.
8. 8 Defence in tort Volenti non fit injuria
to him who consents - no injury done
9. 9 Negligence Donohue v Stevenson 1932
10. 10 Duty of Care What would a reasonable man do?
No10 Clapham Omnibus
11. 11 Resultant loss Causal link to defendants conduct
Damages to claimant
Damages caused by oil pollution catching fire.
WagonMound 1961 p191
12. 12 Economic Loss Spartan Steel and Alloys Ltd v Martin and Co 1973
Cable cut - batch of molten metal spoilt. Takes 14hours to repair furnace.
14 hours profit claimed
unreasonable?
13. 13 Consumer Protection Act 1987 Includes Criminal liability for unsafe goods
Pt 1 imposes strict liability on manufacturers, importers and distributors for goods likely to cause injury or damage to property.
14. 14 Consumer Protection Act 1987 Pt 2 makes suppliers criminally liable for supplying unsafe goods
Pt 3 refers to misleading prices.