480 likes | 579 Views
DEA $ $ $ Spending; Necessary?. tom/ justin / dani. Introduction. Our Purpose. From looking at the available data on drug usage, we want to prove that the constant increase in spending by the DEA is unnecessary.
E N D
DEA $$$ Spending; Necessary? tom/justin/dani
Our Purpose • From looking at the available data on drug usage, we want to prove that the constant increase in spending by the DEA is unnecessary. • The linear trend, when compared to that of the drug usage, will make no positive impact for the DEA.
The DEA:who are they? • More specifically: the Drug Enforcement Administration • Law enforcement agency under the US Department of Justice
The DEA: what is their mission? • The mission of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is to enforce the controlled substances laws and regulations of the United States and bring to the criminal and civil justice system of the United States, or any other competent jurisdiction, those organizations and principal members of organizations, involved in the growing, manufacture, or distribution of controlled substances appearing in or destined for illicit traffic in the United States; and to recommend and support non-enforcement programs aimed at reducing the availability of illicit controlled substances on the domestic and international markets.
The DEA: what dothey do? • Drug smuggling and usage within the United States • Lead agency for domestic enforcement • Coordinate and pursue US drug investigations abroad
The DEA:spending situation? • Current budget: $2,602 Million • Split up amongst the various categories • Constantly increasing every year
The DEA:employment situation? • Total Employees: 10,784 • Special Agents: 5,233 • Support Staff: 5,551
Drug Use:what is it? • Using non-harmful dosage of a substance recreationally • Used with the intention of creating or enhancing a recreational experience • Used with eliminated risk of negatively affecting other aspects of one's life • Drug abuse is when you are using a substance in a harmful dosage
Drug Use:cocaine? • Powerful addictive stimulant that directly affects the brain • One of the oldest drugs known • Abused substance – 100 years • Source, coca leaves - thousands
Drug Use:heroin? • Highly addictive and rapidly acting opiate • Morphine – principal component of naturally occurring substance opium • Injected, snorted, smoked • White – eastern, black or brown - western
Drug Use:marijuana? • Mind-altering substance produced from a plant with the scientific name, Cannabis sativa. • Active chemical, THC, induces relaxation and heightening of the senses • Dried, shredded leaves, stems, seeds and flowers • Green, Brown or Gray • Lower quality– all parts, higher quality – bud and flowering top
Drug Use:methamphetamine? • Synthetic stimulant that is highly addictive • Produces euphoric effects, sense of well-being – 24 hours • Inexpensive, relatively east to produce • Crystallized or rock-like-chunks • White, yellow, brown, gray, orange, and pink
Drug Use:hallucinogens? • Substance that produces profound distortions in a person’s perception of reality • See images, hear sounds, and feel sensations that seem real but do not exist • Cause motions to swing wildly and real-world sensations to assume unreal, sometimes frightening aspects • LSD is and the most widely used in this class of drugs • Around for thousands of years, from Arctic to the Tropics
Drug Use:from 1991-2008 • Analyzed 5 age groups from a monitoringthefuture.org report • 8th grade, 10th grade, 12th grade, College, Young Adult • Looked at 5 of the most well known illegal drugs • Marijuana, Cocaine, Crack, Heroin, Hallucinogens
Drug Use:eighth grade • Add info
Drug Use:most significant? • Best linear regression: Any ~ Marijuana + Hallucinogens • Marijuana most significant
Drug Use:individual drug by years • All polynomial • Each one mirrors the graph of Any vs. Year • Especially marijuana
Drug Use:most significant? • Best linear regression: Any ~ Marijuana + Cocaine + Crack + Hallucinogens • Marijuana most significant, but cocaine is close
Drug Use:individual drug by years • All polynomial • Each one mirrors the graph of Any vs. Year • Especially marijuana
Drug Use:most significant? • Best linear regression: Any ~ Marijuana + Crack + Hallucinogens • Marijuana most significant, but crack is close
Drug Use:individual drug by years • All polynomial • Each one mirrors the graph of Any vs. Year • Especially marijuana
Drug Use:most significant? • Best linear regression: Any ~ Marijuana + Cocaine + Crack + Hallucinogens • Marijuana most significant, although cocaine is close
Drug Use:individual drug by years • Different than expected • Only marijuana and crack appear polynomial
Drug Use:most significant? • Best linear regression: Any ~ Marijuana + Cocaine + Hallucinogens • Marijuana most significant variable
Drug Use:individual drug by years • Marijuana close to expected trend • Crack and heroin vary very little
What can we determine? • Drug use has changed as a polynomial • Peaked around the year 2000 for almost all age groups • Most significant drugs: • Marijuana • Hallucinogens • Insignificant drug? • Heroin
Pearson’s product-moment correlation: • p-value = .2158 • correlation = .306667
Marijuana: • At peak of polynomial, budget increases as marijuana usage continues to drop • For 8 years
Cocaine: • More closely related to budget than other drugs
Hallucinogens: • Ended peak earlier than average drug use • Negatively correlated to budget
Impact of Marijuana Seizures on Use: • summary(lm(ts(Marijuana) ~ ts(weed_kg)) • Coefficients: • Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) • 4.410e-06 4.714e-06 0.936 0.363 • Residual standard error: 2.345 on 16 degrees of freedom • Multiple R-squared: 0.05187, Adjusted R-squared: -0.007391 • F-statistic: 0.8753 on 1 and 16 DF, p-value: 0.3634 • Not very helpful, looks more like exponential
Impact of Marijuana Seizures on Use (cont.) • summary(dyn$lm(ts(Marijuana) ~ lag(ts(weed_kg),2) + lag(ts(I(weed_kg^2)), 2))) • Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) • 6.900e-05 1.687e-05 4.090 0.00128 ** • -8.021e-11 2.063e-11 -3.888 0.00187 ** • Residual standard error: 1.745 on 13 degrees of freedom • Multiple R-squared: 0.5653 • Adjusted R-squared: 0.4985 • F-statistic: 8.454 on 2 and 13 DF, p-value: 0.004446 • Lagged by 2 years creates best model • Reasonable that effects of busts are not immediate
Impacts of Other Drug Seizure on Use: • summary(dyn$lm(ts(Hallucinogens) ~ lag(ts(hall_doses),1))) • # R-squared: 0.2241 • # P: 0.06823 • summary(dyn$lm(ts(Heroin) ~ lag(ts(heroin_kg),0))) • # R-squared: 0.2864 • # P: 0.01292 • summary(dyn$lm(ts(Cocaine) ~ lag(ts(coke_kg),1))) • # R-squared: 0.02374 • # P: 0.2569 • Possible impact from heroin/hallucinogens • No benefit from exponentials • Benefit of the doubt given to best 0-2 year impact • Cocaine busts appear to have no effect on use
Impact of Arrestson Drug Use: • summary(dyn$lm(ts(Any) ~ lag(ts(arrests),1))) • # R-squared: 0.5071 • # P: 0.0005508 • summary(dyn$lm(ts(Marijuana) ~ lag(ts(arrests),1))) • # R-squared: 0.5045 • # P: 0.001231 • summary(dyn$lm(ts(Hallucinogens) ~ lag(ts(arrests),0))) • # R-squared: 0.7976 • # P: 5.639e-5 • summary(dyn$lm(ts(Heroin) ~ lag(ts(arrests),1))) • # R-squared: 0.6273 • # P: 0.0001550 • summary(dyn$lm(ts(Cocaine) ~ lag(ts(arrests),0))) • # R-squared: 0.4472 • # P: 0.001442
What impacts arrests pre-1999? Budget • summary(dyn$lm(ts(arrests) ~ lag(ts(budget),1))) • Coefficients: • Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) • 26.190 2.966 8.830 0.000117 *** • Multiple R-squared: 0.9285, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9166 • F-statistic: 77.97 on 1 and 6 DF, p-value: 0.0001172 Employees • summary(dyn$lm(ts(arrests) ~ lag(ts(employees),1))) • Coefficients: • Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) • 8.458 4.542e-01 18.62 1.55e-06 *** • Multiple R-squared: 0.983, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9802 • F-statistic: 346.7 on 1 and 6 DF, p-value: 1.548e-06
What impacts arrests post-1999? Budget • summary(dyn$lm(ts(arrests) ~ lag(ts(budget),1))) • Coefficients: • Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) • -13.512 3.721 -3.631 0.008388 ** • Multiple R-squared: 0.6532, Adjusted R-squared: 0.6036 • F-statistic: 13.18 on 1 and 7 DF, p-value: 0.008388 Employees • summary(dyn$lm(ts(arrests) ~ lag(ts(employees),1))) • Coefficients: • Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) • -5.996 1.158 -5.178 0.00128 ** • Multiple R-squared: 0.793, Adjusted R-squared: 0.7634 • F-statistic: 26.81 on 1 and 7 DF, p-value: 0.001284