140 likes | 153 Views
Magnetism of the regular and excess iron in Fe 1+x Te studied by Mössbauer spectroscopy A. Błachowski 1 , K. Ruebenbauer 1 , P. Zajdel 2 , E.E. Rodriguez 3 , M.A. Green 3 , 4 1 Mössbauer Spectroscopy Division, Institute of Physics, Pedagogical University , Kraków , Poland
E N D
Magnetism of the regular and excess iron in Fe1+xTe studied by Mössbauer spectroscopy A. Błachowski1, K. Ruebenbauer1, P. Zajdel2, E.E. Rodriguez3, M.A. Green3, 4 1Mössbauer Spectroscopy Division, Institute of Physics, Pedagogical University, Kraków, Poland 2Division of Physics of Crystals, Institute of Physics, Silesian University, Katowice, Poland 3National Institute of Standards and Technology, Center for Neutron Research,Gaithersburg, U.S.A. 4Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Maryland, U.S.A. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- XVI National Conference on Superconductivity, 7-12 October 2013, Zakopane, Poland
Fe-based Superconducting Families pnictogens:P, As, Sb chalcogens:S, Se, Te 111112211111 LnO(F)FeAsAFe2As2AFeAs FeTe(Se,S) Ln = La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd … A = Ca, Sr, Ba, Eu, K A = Li , Na Tscmax = 56 K 47 K 18 K 14 K 37 K at 9 GPa
Layered Structure of Fe-based Superconductors Spin density wave (SDW) magnetic order --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fe1+xTe BaFe2As2 perpendicular longitudinal COMMENSURATE or INCOMMENSURATE
Spin density wave (SDW) seen by Mössbauer Spectroscopy h2n-1–amplitudes of subsequent harmonics q– wave number of SDW x– relative position of the resonant nucleus along propagation direction of SDW SDWhyperfine field distribution57Fe Mössbauer spectrum
Magnetic-crystallographic phase diagram Fe1+xTe x = 0.04 – 0.18 x = 0.06 , 0.10 , 0.14 , 0.18 S. Röler et al., Phys. Rev. B 84 174506 (2011) x in Fe1+xTe G.F. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. B 79 140509(R) (2009)
Parent Compound Fe1+yTe Doped Compound→Superconductor y ≈ 0 Fe1+yTe1-xSexFe1+yTe1-xSx K. Katayama et al., J. Phys. Soc. Japan 79, 113702 (2010) Y. Mizuguchi et al., J. Appl. Phys. 109, 013914 (2011)
Alcoholic beverages induce superconductivity in FeTe1−xSx K. Deguchiet al., Supercond. Sci. Technol. 24, 055008 (2011) ”Some components present in alcoholic beverages, other than water and ethanol, have the ability to induce superconductivity in FeTe0.8S0.2 compound.”
57Fe Mössbauer spectra SDW field distribution shape of SDW Fe1.06Te regular (tetrahedral) Feexcess (interstitial) Fe SDWhigher magnetic fields than SDW
57Fe Mössbauer spectraSDW field distribution shape of SDW Fe1.14Te SDW regular Fe Three different kinds (surroundings) of excess (interstitial) Fe. Magnetism of the excess Fe and SDW disappear at the same transition temperature.
65 K 4.2 K regular Fe (SDW)excess Fe Fe1+xTe x=0.06 x=0.10 x=0.14 x=0.18 shape of SDW at 4.2 K SDW is very sensitive to concentration of interstitial iron with relatively large localized magnetic moments.
Root mean square amplitude of SDW versus temperature The critical exponent of the mean square amplitude of SDW versus temperature indicates that the universality class is close to the (1, 2) class, i.e. the one dimension of the spin space (Ising model) and two spatial dimensions (Fe-Te layers).
Conclusions Excess (interstitial) iron with relatively large localized magnetic moment strongly influences ordering temperature, shape and amplitude of the regular iron SDW order. Despite existence of the single crystallographic site for the excess iron one sees at least three different kinds of these atoms. Such situation could occur due to the partial filling of the available interstitial sites by iron and due to some ordering (or clustering). The site with the highest magnetic hyperfine field is likely to contain almost isolated ions, i.e., surrounded by the vacancies on the interstitial sites. The magnetism of the excess iron and SDW are coupled one with another. Both kinds of magnetism disappear at the same transition temperature. Interstitial iron has relatively large localized magnetic moment. These moments interact strongly with the electrons having ability to form Cooper pairs and prevent appearance of the superconductivity. One has to remove interstitial iron to have a chance to get superconducting material. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. Błachowski, K. Ruebenbauer, P. Zajdel, E.E. Rodriguez, M.A. Green, Mössbauer study of the ‘11’ iron-based superconductors parent compound Fe1+xTe, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 386006 (2012)
Clarification as to why alcoholic beverages have the ability to induce superconductivity in Fe1+dTe1-xSx K. Deguchi et al., Supercond. Sci. Technol.25, 084025(2012)
Clarification as to why alcoholic beverages have the ability to induce superconductivity in Fe1+dTe1-xSx K. Deguchi et al., Supercond. Sci. Technol.25, 084025(2012) ”We found that the mechanism of inducement of superconductivity in Fe1+dTe1-xSx is the deintercalation of excess Fe from the interlayer sites.”