170 likes | 195 Views
This paper explores the role of agriculture and food consumption in the solidarity economy in Marche, Italy. It analyzes the food supply chain of Italian solidarity purchasing groups (GAS) and examines the economic, ecological, and social aspects of GAS. The results suggest that GAS play a significant role in supporting local farmers, promoting sustainable food systems, and enhancing food quality. The findings shed light on the potential of solidarity economy in fostering social and economic transformations in urbanizing societies.
E N D
Agriculture in an Urbanizing Society International Conference on Multifunctional Agriculture and Urban-Rural Relations The Netherlands | 1 - 4 April 2012 “Loneliness is for the spirit, what food is to the body.” (Seneca) Perspectives on the Solidarity Economy in Marche, Italy: hypothesis on the role of agriculture and food consumption Authors: Matteo Belletti The Polytechnic University of Marche m.belletti@univpm.it Lucia Mancini European Commission (JRC, Ispra) luciamancini25@gmail.com WG3 - Exploring “civic food networks” and their role in enabling sustainable urban food systems. Session 4, Tuesday 3th of April, 2012
Contents • The research • Results • Interpretation of the results • Conclusions
Objectives • Interpreting the food supply chain of the Italian “GAS” solidarity purchasing groups (Brunori et al., 2012) ... • The food economy within GAS experience • Food quality differentiation within GAS • Environmental impact of food purchased through GAS • Key elements emerging from GAS practice • ...within a wider context of “change” focussing on a process of cooperation among Universities and Civil Society • The active role of University in supporting the process • The strategy • Planning
Methodology • Exploratory structure aimed at investigating the three basic elements constituting the “GAS food supply chain”: • GAS, as food retailer • Supply, farmers delivering GASs • Demand, GAS Household Members (GHM) • Data collection • Face to face quanti-qualitative interviews to a quota-sample of: • 20 GASs • 182 GHMs • 20 farmers delivering GASs (in-depth interview too) • Data analysis • GAS economic reading: • GAS market behaviour: income statement on supply, PCA on demand • GAS ecological assessment: Material Input per Service Unit (MIPS, Lettenmeier et al., 2009)
The GAS as food retailer • GAS average size: • 70 households, • range min-max 12-190 households, • 50% of them (GASs) consisting of 33 to 95 households • GAS household size: • Average family size approaching three members • Household food expenditure through the GAS : • On average 130 Euros per month, accounting for ca. 20% of the average food expenditure of Italian households (Istat, 2011). • 25% of the GHMinterviewed said their food bill is 200 to 500 Euros per month • 53% of the GHM interviewed stated that the GAS is the main channel for their food purchases.
Supply • Farmer type A: having GAS as the main outlet; • Farmer type B: providing only surpluses from his other market channels to GAS; • Farmer type C: using GAS together with and complementarily to other SFSC (e.g. farm outlet for direct selling, direct selling to school refectories, etc.).
Demand • Family replacement capacity of conventional distribution with GAS distribution: • The highest substitution capability of GAS in Marche, Italy • pasta • rice • flours • other cereal derivatives • extra virgin olive oil • Honey • sugar • coffee, tea & other non-alcoholic beverages • The simultaneous growth in GAS purchasing of different product categories is related to products requiring little organisational capacity in terms of distribution and intermediaries: • stockable no perishable products, requiring less frequent restocking; ii) • typical local products that are easily purchased in farms found close to towns; and iii) • products easily bought from fair trade outlets.
GASEcological assessment Figure 1. The systems under investigation • GAS Eco-efficiency: • Negative with regard to the GAS biotic dimension: mainly linked to the lower yields of agronomic organic practice and the substitution of chemical inputs with vegetal and animal biomass • Positive with regard to i) GAS abiotic dimension, ii) air, iii) water, elements mainly related to the avoidance of agrochemicals and shortening of the supply chain • Result (biotic+abiotic) • = +10% eco-gain Source: our elaboration
Our own “Truman Show” • Issue n.1 • In which part of the film are we working? • - Truman’s awareness (bounded rationality) • Issue n.2 • Will our hero survive the storm in his small boat Santa Maria? • - Truman’s determination (impact on supply chain) • Issue n.3 • Will our hero choose to EXIT? • - Truman’s freedom (willingness to pay for the change)
Christof’s control • Issue n.1 • The Italian agri-food market • Agricultural income (figure 2) • Ecological statement • Issue n.2 • The GAS market functioning • The hidden effect of competition on quality-price ratio • is a sensitive spread between supply and demand values • (as show by figure 3) • Issue n.3 • The price and quality relationship • Quality labels and certificates are among the most widely used methods to compensate for information asymmetry in food markets. Nevertheless food safety (along with quality certification and environmental impact of production) remains a credence attribute (Poulton and Lyne, 2009).
RememberFarmer type C Figure 2. Horticultural product-mix price and incidence of Family Farm Labour Opportunity Cost (FFLOC) on Average Total Cost (ATC) in Marche, Italy (Euros per kilogram) SFSC “income generation” Source: our elaboration
RememberFarmer type B The price and quality relationship Figure 3. Price trend for wheat and pasta in Italy (€/Kg) Sept-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Conventional wheat Conventional wheat Organic wheat Conventional pasta Organic pasta Source: ISMEA (2011)
Towards the EXIT • Issue n.1 • Prices • SFSC seems to be a necessary condition to face the ecological dimension of agricultural sustainability issues but is not sufficient to solve the economic problems of farm households. As a result, Gas household members should shift their focus from the prices to price construction. • Issue n.2 • Market organization • The GAS movement should veer towards a system of self-certification for food, maybe at a regional level, based on taking into account two key elements of agri-food chain suitability in the short and in the long run. The first, at a strictly agronomical level, is the local climate and habitat. The second, at a wide ecological level, is the entire agri-food supply chain structure, highlighting the crucial role of agricultural inputs. • Issue n.3 • Quality • It can be argued that competitive market behaviour and ecological balance are two key elements regarding which GAS should not rely on labels as a guarantee of differentiation, and this is true the more extensive the area in which the label works (as EU organic farming).
...and thanks for your unusual concentration! “In case I don't see you ... good afternoon, good evening, and good night” (Truman Burbank alias Jim Carrey, The Truman Show, 1998) Work in progress