700 likes | 714 Views
This article explores the need for a balanced approach to assessment in the 21st century, focusing on both annual accountability testing and daily classroom assessment practices. It discusses the research on assessment and student achievement, as well as the necessary improvements to realize gains. The article also highlights the importance of a multi-level assessment system and differentiates between summative and formative assessment.
E N D
A Balanced Approach to 21st Century Assessment Lisa Youell Superintendent’s Center for 21st Century Schools West Virginia Department of Education
Is it on the test? Don’t worry, it’s Not On The Test!
Physical Exam Once a Year… • Yields indicators of one’s health • Concerns about the final numbers • Doctor makes recommendations
Doctor’s Recommendations? Focus on the Exam Once a Year Focus on Healthy Practices Daily Practice good habits on a daily basis Drink water every day Eat more fiber Eat fruits and vegetables Eat less fat Exercise/walk Avoid tobacco • For 3 months before the next exam do the following: • Exercise • Get more sleep • Eat oats everyday
Once a Year… School’s Annual Checkup • Yields indicators of school’s progress • Concerns about the final numbers • Principal makes recommendations
School’s Annual Checkup Focus on the Test Once a Year Focus on Daily Practices Become assessment literate Use day to day classroom assessment practices that involve students directly in self-assessment, goal setting, and communicating about their own learning Collect a continuous stream of evidence of student learning Use assessment information formatively to plan further instruction • For 3 months before the test do the following: • Look at the data • Determine weaknesses • Practice test items with standardized format
We are living in the old system while we are trying to build a new system.
Annual Accountability Testing (State Summative Test) Periodic Benchmark Assessments Continuous Classroom Assessment For Learning Institutional/Policy Users (School, District and State Leadership) Program Level Users (Teacher Teams and Leaders) Classroom Level Users (Students, Teachers and Parents) In a Perfect System…
Research on Assessment & Student Achievement British researchers Paul Black and Dylan Wiliam completed a comprehensive review of 250 international studies exploring the connection between formative assessment practices and student achievement (1998)
Research on Assessment & Student Achievement • Does improved formative assessment cause better learning? • Do formative assessment practices need improving? • Is there evidence about how to improve formative assessment?
Needed Improvements to Realize Gains • Increased commitment to high-quality classroom assessments • Increased descriptive feedback; reduced evaluative feedback • Increased student involvement in the assessment process Black and Wiliam, 1989
Black & Wiliam Research on Effects of Classroom Assessment for Learning:.4 to .7 Gain .7 Standard Deviation Score Gain = • 25 Percentile Points on ITBS • 70 SAT Score Points • 4 ACT Score Points Largest Gain for Low Achievers
A Productive Multi-Level Assessment System • Is needed to be sure that all instructional decisions are informed and well made • Is needed to meet the informational needs of all users at all levels • State • District • School • Classroom (teachers and students)
A Balanced Assessment System Assessment of Learning • Summative Assessment • An event after learning • Benchmark Assessment (Common or Interim Assessments) • An event after learning Assessment for Learning • Formative Assessment • A process during learning • Classroom Assessment For Learning • A process during learning
Critical Questions • What is the primary aim of assessment? • Who will use the information? • What decisions will they make?
Common Language? Summative Assessment Formative Assessment Assessment FOR Learning Benchmark Assessments Assessment OF Learning Classroom Assessment For Learning
Assessment OF LearningUsers Uses What How When • Turn to your neighbor and discuss the key differences in benchmark and summative assessment.
Assessment of Learning Periodic (3 or 4 times during the year Annual
Primary Users Benchmark Summative
Typical Uses Summative Benchmark
Assess What? Benchmark Summative
Assess How? Summative Benchmark
Assess When? Benchmark Summative
Assessment for Learning Users Uses What How When Turn to your neighbor and discuss the key differences in formative and classroom assessment for learning.
Assessment for Learning
Needed Improvements to Realize Gains • Increased commitment to high-quality classroom assessments • Increased descriptive feedback; reduced evaluative feedback • Increased student involvement in the assessment process Black and Wiliam, 1989
Primary Users Classroom Assessment for Learning Formative Assessment Student as Decision Maker
Typical Uses Classroom Assessment for Learning Formative Assessment Descriptive Feedback
Typical Uses Classroom Assessment for Learning Formative Assessment Student Involvement
Assess What? Formative Assessment Classroom Assessment for Learning Learning Targets
Learning Targets A learning target is an achievement expectation we hold for students. It’s a statement of what we want the student to learn. Is this a target? • Math • Decimals • Page 152 in the book • Going on a decimal hunt • Read decimals and put them in order
Summative Assessment Objective/Benchmark: First Grade Reading /English Language Arts Produce writing to communicate with different audiences for a variety of purposes. Overall Target Type: Knowledge Reasoning Performance Skill Product Learning Targets What are the knowledge, reasoning, performance skill or product targets underpinning the standard/objective? Knowledge Targets Reasoning Targets Performance Skill Targets Product Targets Distinguish the uses or meanings of a variety of words (word choice) Holds a pencil correctly Print letters correctly Space words Use lines & margins Stretch out sounds in words to create a temporary spelling of a word Write sentences with varied beginnings Know what a sentence is Understand concept of word choice Formative/Classroom Assessment for Learning
Summative Assessment Standard/Objective: Drive with skill. Type: Knowledge Reasoning Performance Skill Product Learning Targets What are the knowledge, reasoning, skill or product targets underpinning the standard/objective? Knowledge Targets Reasoning Targets Performance Skill Targets Product Targets • Know the law • Understand informal rules of the road • Understand what different parts of the car do • Read signs and understand what they mean • Understand what “creating a danger” means • Understand what “creating a hazard” means • Other? • Analyze road conditions, vehicle performance, and other driver’s actions • Compare/contrast this information with knowledge and past experience • Synthesize information and evaluate options to make decisions on what to do next • Evaluate “Am I safe?” and synthesize information to take action if needed. • Other? • Driving actions such as: steering, shifting, parallel parking, looking, signaling, backing up, braking, accelerating, etc. • Fluidity/automaticity in performance driving actions. • Other? None Since the ultimate type of target is a performance skill, there are no embedded product targets Formative/Classroom Assessment for Learning
Clear Learning Targets • We need clear targets to… • Know if the assessment adequately covers what we taught • Correctly identify what students know and don’t know • Have students self-assess or set goals for future study that are likely to help them learn more • Keep track of student learning target by target • Complete a standards-based report card
Assess How? Classroom Assessment for Learning Formative Assessment
Assess When? Classroom Assessment for Learning Formative Assessment
Classroom Assessment for Learning The only difference in Formative Assessment (as described above) and Classroom Assessment for Learning is the student involvement component.
What Are the Benefits of Assessment FOR Learning ? • Making student thinking and understanding more visible • Using results primarily to shape and adjust what happens next in classrooms, rather than to provide a grade or mark • Using assessment to encourage, not discourage, student effort • Engaging students in thinking about themselves as learners
Review of Research Literature …achievement gains from using such assessment-for-learning strategies were “among the largest ever reported for educational interventions.” -Black and Wiliam (1998) • More frequent testing does not necessarily mean greater gains. • The strategies Black and Wiliam refer to involve students in the entire process.
What a Difference a Word Makes Video Presentation by Rick Stiggins
A Balanced Approach “Teachers involve their students in classroom assessment, record-keeping, and communication during learning. But, when it’s time for students to be accountable for what they have learned, the teacher takes the lead in conducting assessments OF learning.” -Richard J. Stiggins
Assessment OF and FORLearning Sort Activity: • Assessment for Learning • Assessment of Learning • Not Sure
Needed Improvements to Realize Gains • Increased commitment to high-quality classroom assessments • Increased descriptive feedback; reduced evaluative feedback • Increased student involvement in the assessment process Black and Wiliam, 1989
Descriptive or Evaluative Feedback? You made some simple mistakes multiplying 3-digit numbers.
The giving of marks and the grading function are overemphasized, while the giving of useful advice and learning function are underemphasized. --Black & Wiliam,1998 http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/learningaboutlearning/movies/feedbackonlearningdylanwiliam.asp
Feedback • Take a minute to read over the research on effective feedback (handout). • Discuss with those at your table. • Summarize important ideas from the research and draw conclusions about effective feedback.
Effective feedback points out successes and gives specific information about how to improve the performance or product.--Black & Wiliam, 1998: Black et al, 2002; Bloom, 1989; Brown, 1994
Effective learners operate best when they have insight into their own strengths and weaknesses and access to their own repertoires of strategies for learning.--Brown, 1994
Feedback is effective when it offers information about progress relative to the intended learning goal and about what action to take to reach the intended learning goal.--Hattie & Timperley, 2005
Comments directed to the quality of the work—what was done well and what needs improving—increase student interest in the task and level of achievement.--Butler, 1988