250 likes | 444 Views
AD Applications to Industrial Wastewater. Shihwu Sung, Ph.D., PE. Department of Civil, Construction & Environmental Engineering Iowa State University. Anaerobic Treatment Short Course Part 5. Background AD Fundamentals * Wastewater Characteristics Analysis
E N D
AD Applications to Industrial Wastewater Shihwu Sung, Ph.D., PE Department of Civil, Construction & Environmental Engineering Iowa State University Anaerobic Treatment Short Course Part 5
Background • AD Fundamentals • * Wastewater Characteristics Analysis • * Anaerobic Treatment Processes • (Traditional vs. High-Rate) • AD Applications to Sewage Sludge • AD Applications to Animal Wastes • AD Applications to Industrial Wastewaters • Beneficial Use of Biosolids & Regulations • AD Bio-refinery Concept
Best candidates of Industrial Wastewaters for Anaerobic Treatment • Alcohol production • Brewery and Winery • Sugar processing • Starch (barley, corn, potato, wheat, tapioca and desizing • waste from textile industry. • Food processing • Bakery plant • Pulp and paper • Dairy • Slaughterhouse • Petrochemical waste
Thin Stillage from Dry Corn Milling Ethanol Plant • Anaerobic Digestion (AD) • Fungal Biomass-to-Chitin and Chitosan
Ground Corn Slurry Tank Liquefaction Unit Distillation System Ethanol Fermentor DDGS DWG (10-12% H2O) DWGS (60-65% H2O) Rotary Drier #2 Rotary Drier #1 (30% H2O) Centrifuge Whole Stillage (90%) (10%) (88% H2O) Syrup Evaporator (60%H2O) (94% H2O) DWG : Distiller's Wet Grains Condensate DWGS: Distiller's Wet Grains with Solubles DDGS: Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles Overview of Production Processes Thin Stillage
AD - Methane Yield Not Steady State S C S C S C S C
AD - Volatile Solids Not Steady State
Stillage Digestion Corn Related Studies Thermophilic CSTR Studies
Stillage Digestion • Energy Recycling (Basis: 45 Mgal/yr at MGP) • Displace 43% to 59% of natural gas usage • High: $17 million/year • Low: $7 million/year • Likely: $10 million/yr • Saving a dime per gallon
Objectives • Demonstrate the performance of AMBR to treat synthetic =wastewater at different HRT • Investigate the dynamics of methanogenic activity during start-up of AMBR • Elucidate the role of cake on the membrane surface as a biofilm or secondary membrane
500μm Non-woven Filter (NWF) and Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) • NWF: random, entangled and multi-layer assembly of fibers • Formation of dynamic membrane by either pore clogging • or cake-layer formation PTFE laminated non-woven filter Non-woven filter
Synthetic Wastewater COD = 500 mg/L
Operation Conditions AMBR operating temperature: 25oC
Reactor and Permeate COD HRT: 8 h HRT: 6 h HRT: 12 h
COD Removal Efficiency HRT: 8 h HRT: 6 h HRT: 12 h Bioreactor Membrane
Biomass HRT: 8 h HRT: 6 h HRT: 12 h
Sludge Morphology suspended sludge attached sludge 10μm
Methane Yield and Biogas Composition 8 6 HRT (h)
Conclusions • AMBR system was able to treat low strength wastewater at HRT as low as 6h with effluent quality better than the conventional activated sludge process. • AMBR system produced nearly zero excess sludge. • Membrane in AMBR system complemented the decrease in biological removal efficiency. • About 65 to 75% of the influent COD was converted into methane gas. • AMBR could be used to treat low strength wastewater.