130 likes | 146 Views
This study examines Regular Polyhedron Loudspeakers (RPLs) as sources of sound, comparing different types and their omnidirectionality. Experimental setup, standard deviation analysis, advantages, and drawbacks are discussed. Conclusions and recommendations for further research are provided, along with acknowledgments.
E N D
An Experimental Evaluation of Regular Polyhedron Loudspeakersas Omnidirectional Sources of Sound Sarah Rollins Timothy W. Leishman Acoustics Research Group Department of Physics and Astronomy Brigham Young University November 11, 2003
Introduction • Architectural Acoustics • Omnidirectional source • Dodecahedron loudspeaker • Regular Polyhedrons • Regular Polyhedron Loudspeakers (RPLs) • What about other RPLs besides the dodecahedron?
Regular Polyhedron Loudspeakers • Built all 5 RPLs • 2 categories • Equal Volume per Driver (EV) • Equal Midradii (EM)
Standard Deviation Formulation • Standard deviation of directivity balloon values • Advantages over current methods • Visualization • Full sphere • Disadvantages • More time consuming • More equipment
Figure of Merit Table * Indicates the lowest value for the given frequency range
Conclusions • Best omnidirectional source • Depends on bandwidth • Tetrahedron • 0-4 kHz octave band • Contradicts ISO 3382 • Dodecahedron • 0-8 kHz octave band • More power output
Further Research • Higher resolution measurements • High frequency information • Impulse response measurements • Compare measurements for different RPLs and different orientations • Further comparison of standard deviation with current methods to quantify omnidirectivity • Analytical and numerical calculations • Different size RPLs
Acknowledgments • Funding: NSF REU program • Advisor: Dr. Timothy W. Leishman • Gordon Dix • Kent Gee • Todd Kitchen • Wesley Lifferth • Jacob Robinson