230 likes | 249 Views
Explore the Lewis Model, urban informal sector characteristics, urbanization impacts, importance of informal jobs, Harris-Todaro Model, and consequences of rural-urban migration. Understand policy options for urban-rural balance and human capital development.
E N D
Development EconomicsV (cntd.) Prof. Dr. Hans H. Bass Jacobs University, Spring 2010
Agenda Feb. 25 / March 11 Development Economics • Urbanization • The Urban Informal Sector • Rural to Urban Migration
The Lewis Model Revisited 2. The Urban Informal Sector • Two sectors: agriculture and modern urban sector • in agriculture MPL = 0 • agricultural wage rate = average product • institutional inflexibility of wage rate in the modern sector:(a) trade unions, (b) employment strategies of TNCs • agricultural wage rate < modern sector wage rate
The Lewis Model Cntd 2. The Urban Informal Sector • rural to urban migration exceeds employment opportunities in the modern sector • rationing of modern sector employment according to formal education • short-term reaction: all sorts of odd jobs • long-term reaction: investment into formal education • increased growth potential by accumulation of human capital • however: employment rate increases only if industrialization more rapid than population growth
Characteristics 2. The Urban Informal Sector Why is, in spite of the continuous flow of migrants, urban unemployment still low? IS “discovered” 1973 by Keith Hart (Accra) and ILO mission to Kenya: • ease of entry • reliance on indigenous resources • family ownership • small scale of operation • labour intensive and adapted technology • skills acquired outside the formal school system • unregulated and competitive markets (Source: ILO 1973)
Definitions of the IS 2. The Urban Informal Sector "a mode of organisation different from the unit of production most familiar in economic theory, the firm or corporation. These activities are also likely to be unregulated by the state and excluded from standard economic accounts of national income" (Swaminathan/WIDER, 1991, p.1) "units of production, services and commerce whose management method differs from that of the modern sector (in particular the absence of standardized accounts)" (Lachaud/ILO 1994, p. 94) units engaged in the production of goods and services with the primary objective of generating employment and incomes to the persons concerned; low level of organization (= small scale: 1-n) with little or no division between labour and capital as factors of production; activities not necessarily performed with the deliberate intention of evading the payment of taxes or infringing labour or other legislation (vs. underground economy) (15th International Conference of Labour Statisticians: ILO Official Bulletin 1993)
Importance of informal Employment 2. The Urban Informal Sector
Harris-Todaro Model 3. Rural to Urban Migration • High rates of migration are outcomes of rural urban imbalances. Migration proceeds in response to urban-rural differences (returns minus costs) in expected income rather than actual earning • = Migration responds positively to bothhigher urban wages andhigher urban employment opportunities (= probabilities). The probability of obtaining a city job is inversely related to the urban unemployment rate. • Migration rates in excess of urban job opportunity growth rates are rational.
Harris-Todaro Model 3. Rural to Urban Migration
Consequences of theHT model 3. Rural to Urban Migration Which would be the result of the creation of more urban modern-sector jobs? Which would be the result of an expansion of formal education in the country? What would be the effect of wage subsidies to increase labor-intensity of production? ... of efficiency wage rates to increase productivity? How to overcome the “urban bias* / first-city bias”? * Michael Lipton, 1977
Consequences of theHT model 3. Rural to Urban Migration • Create a urban-rural balance • Expand small, labor intensive (rural) industries • Eliminate factor-price distortion • Choose appropriate technologies • Modify the linkage between education and employment • Reduce population growth • Decentralize authority
Quizz 3. Rural to Urban Migration http:// wps.aw.com/ aw_todarosmit_econdevelp_ 10/85/21785/5577112.cw/index.html
Development EconomicsVI Prof. Dr. Hans H. Bass Jacobs University, Spring 2010
Agenda March 11 Development Economics • Health and Education in Economic Development • The Human Capital Approach to Health & Education • Educational Systems and Development
Health and Education 1. Health and Education in Economic Development • Health and education are important objectives of development and also important components of growth and development (dual role) • Greater health capital may improve the returns to investments in education and vice versa • Increases in income often do not lead to substantial increases in investment in children’s education and health significant market failures in education and health require policy action
Age-Earning Profiles 2. The Human Capital Approach to Health and Education
The Basics 2. The Human Capital Approach to Health and Education • Initial investments in health or education lead to a stream of higher future income • The present discounted value of this stream of future income is compared to the costs of the investment • Private costs and returns to education have to be compared to social costs and returns
Graphic representation 2. The Human Capital Approach to Health and Education
Rates of Return to Investment in Education 2. The Human Capital Approach to Health and Education
Supply and demand for education 3. Educational Systems and Development demand for high-wage employment in the modern sector (depends on wage differental plus probability to find a job) derived demand for education(often unrelated to non-economic criteria) supply of education:often unrelated to economic criteriafixed by government expendituresinfluenced by aggregate private demand
Private and social costs and returns to investment in education 3. Educational Systems and Development
Lorenz Curves for Education 3. Educational Systems and Development
Gini Coefficients for Education, 1990 3. Educational Systems and Development