Update on LCLS User Proposals

1. John Arthur, Jochen Schneider Experimental Facilities DivisionJune 25, 2009 Update on LCLS User Proposals

2. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Maintenance 4,260 2,160 2,160 2,160 1,960 1,960 Machine studieselectrons 2,750 1,300 1,300 1,300 900 900 Machine studiesphotons 1,250 1,300 1,300 1,300 900 900 Photon scienceexperiments 500 4,000 4,000 4,000 5,000 5,000 Tentative operation plan for LCLS [hours per fiscal year] Start of commissioning, early operations AMO 09-09 SXR 04-10 XPP 10-10 XCI 05-11 08-11 XCS MEC Tentative instrument operation scheme Instruments and Tentative Operations Plan Near Experimental Hall AMO SXR XPP CXI XCS MEC Far Experimental Hall

3. Soft X-ray Experiments at LCLS (500) 800 eV – 2 keV Available March 2010 Available August 2009

4. Information on LCLS Website Atomic, Molecular & Optical Science - AMO This instrument will enable the study of the interaction between the extremely intense LCLS X-ray pulses and the basic constituents of matter: atoms and molecules. » view instrument profile» view technical specifications Soft X-ray Materials Science - SXR This instrument will enable the high brightness and timing capability of the LCLS to be applied to scattering and imaging experiments that require the use of soft X-rays. » view instrument profile» view technical specifications Scientific Application Time-resolved spectroscopy and scattering with ultrafast and ultraintense soft X-rays at the LCLS Techniques X-ray Emission Spectroscopy (XES) X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS) Coherent Imaging Fourier Transform Holography Sample Environment A wide range of experimental setups in UHV and UV conditions

5. Outcome of 1st call for proposals ScientistsProposals Scientists Proposals Australia 4 Ireland 1 China 2 Italy 8 Czech Republic 4 Japan 6 Denmark 1 Netherlands 4 Finland 1 Poland 3 France 1 Sweden 263 Germany 708 United Kingdom 1 India 41 United States 8316 “Experiments at the AMO beamline (0.8-2 keV)” 28 proposals were received with 219 scientists from 16 countries involved , many of them in more than one. • Half of the proposals were motivated by single particle imaging. • 21 proposals want to use the AMO station as built, 5 proposals want to use a special chamber built in Hamburg and moved to LCLS for the experiments, 2 proposals want to use very special chambers which the groups will provide.

6. Review of Proposals Members of Proposal Review Panel Christine Back (San Diego) Janos Kirz (LBNL) Maged Chergui (ETH Lausanne)Dwayne Miller (Toronto) Lew Cocke (Kansas) Juerg Osterwalder (University of Zuerich) Gianluca Gregori (Oxford, UK) Metin Tolan (University of Dortmund) Chi-Chang Kao (BNL) Kyoshi Ueda (Tohku University, Sendai) Steve Kevan (Oregon) Edgar Weckert (DESY) Two representatives of LCLS management without voting rights: Jerry Hastings Jochen Schneider First Meeting December 3-4, 2008 For the 1st meeting dealing mainly with proposals for AMO experiments three guests with voting rights were invited: Chris Greene (JILA) Jon Marangos (Imperial College London) Ian McNulty (APS, Argonne Nat. Lab.)

7. Results of 1st PRP Meeting • 3 “more technical” proposals were recommended to be included in early commissioning work • In 2 cases it was recommended to combine two, so far separate proposals with similar scientific goals • 2 single purpose experiments got highest ranking and were invited to discuss the technical implications for integrating the experiments into beamline at a later stage • Taking the above recommendations into account there were 23 “scientific” proposals for about 225 8 hour shifts starting September 1, 2009. The PRP allocated the following rankings to these proposals: • Ranking 1: 11 proposals, including two with specific instrumentation • Ranking 2: 5 proposals, including one “team proposal” • Ranking 3: 2 proposals • Ranking 4: 5 proposals 10 experimentsscheduled • 7 experiments use the AMO instrument as built by LCLS, 3 experiments use the CAMP chamber built by CFEL in Hamburg

8. The 10 Experiments Scheduled for 2009 • Linda Young (Argonne NL)Tracking transient atomic states produced by ultraintense X-ray pulses • Louis DiMauro (Ohio State Univ.)Strong-field multiphoton processes in the high-frequency limit • Nora Berrah (Western Michigan Univ.)X-ray non-linear physics studies of molecules with intense ultrafast LCLS pulses • Ryan Coffee (PULSE-SLAC)X-ray multiple ionization of impulsively aligned molecules • Linda Young (Argonne NL)Resonant nonlinear X-ray processes at high X-ray intensity

9. The 10 Experiments Scheduled for 2009 • John Bozek (LCLS)IR laser and FEL X-ray pulse cross correlation using electron energysidebandsStefan Duesterer (DESY)Dressed photo- and Auger-electrons in intense superposed X-ray andoptical laser fields and their application on timing • Todd Ditmire (Austin, Texas)Explosions of clusters in intense X-ray pulses • Christoph Bostedt (TU Berlin)Ultrafast imaging of X-ray excited clusters • Henry Chapman (CFEL-DESY), Jochen Kuepper (ASG MPG)Diffractive imaging of oriented molecules in the gas phase • Henry Chapman (CFEL-DESY) Coherent diffractive imaging

10. AMO Commissioning/Operations Schedule John Bozek

11. Outcome of 2nd call for proposals ScientistsProposals Scientists Proposals Australia 5 Italy 201 Canada 1 Japan 9 Denmark 1 Netherlands 51 Finland 1 Sweden 425 France 331 Switzerland 91 Germany 11819 United Kingdom 413 India 31 United States 17730 Ireland 4 “Experiments at the AMO and SXR beamlines (0.8-2 keV)” 62 proposals were received with 469 scientists from 15 countries involved , many of them in more than one. • 24 proposals want to use the AMO, 38 proposals the SXR beamline. • At the AMO beamline, 15 proposals want to use the AMO instrument as built by LCLS, 9 proposals want to use the CAMP chamber built by CFEL in Hamburg. • At the SXR beamline, experimental stations will be provided by members of the SXR Consortium and used in collaboration with these groups. More specific, 11 of the proposals want to use the CAMP chamber.

12. Next PRP Meeting 27-28 July Members of Proposal Review Panel Christine Back (San Diego) Janos Kirz (LBNL) Maged Chergui (ETH Lausanne) Dwayne Miller (Toronto) Lew Cocke (Kansas)Juerg Osterwalder (University of Zuerich) Gianluca Gregori (Oxford, UK) Metin Tolan (University of Dortmund) Chi-Chang Kao (BNL) Kyoshi Ueda (Tohku University, Sendai) Steve Kevan (Oregon) Edgar Weckert (DESY) Two representatives of LCLS management without voting rights: Jerry Hastings Jochen Schneider Guest with voting rights invited: Marc Vrakking (FOM Inst for Atomic & Molecular Physics, Amsterdam) External referees asked to help with science review of proposals (send reports by early July): Steve Kahn (SLAC), Steve Boxer (Stanford), Louise Johnson (Oxford), Wolfgang Eberhardt (BESSY), Hajo Tjen (Univ Cologne), Gabriel Aeppli (Ctr for Nanotechnology London), Howard Padmore (ALS), Markus Drescher (Univ Hamburg), Ian Robinson (Ctr for Nanotechnology London), Giancarlo Ruocco (Univ Rome “La Sapienza”), Juerg Osterwalder (Univ Zurich), John Costello (Univ Dublin), Lew Cocke (Univ Kansas), Jan-Michael Rost (MPI Dresden), Christian Schroer (TU Dresden), Hrvoje Petek (Univ Pittsburg)

13. CAMP Chamber Built by CFEL pnCCD CFEL-ASG Multi-Purpose chamber – CAMP adapted for the use of unique large-area, single-photon counting pnCCD detectors from Max Planck Institute Halbleiterlabor

14. Future Proposals • Next closing date: October 1, 2009 • Repeat on 6-month cycle….

15. End of Presentation