1 / 7

THE Brics and r2P: Lessons from the Libyan and syrian crises

Andrew Garwood-Gowers. THE Brics and r2P: Lessons from the Libyan and syrian crises. BRICS and R2P prior to Libya BRICS and Libya BRICS and Syria BRICS and R2P in the future? Central argument: no cohesive BRICS’ position on R2P since Syria – rather, RC on one side and IBSA on the other.

judd
Download Presentation

THE Brics and r2P: Lessons from the Libyan and syrian crises

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Andrew Garwood-Gowers THE Brics and r2P: Lessons from the Libyan and syrian crises

  2. BRICS and R2P prior to Libya BRICS and Libya BRICS and Syria BRICS and R2P in the future? Central argument: no cohesive BRICS’ position on R2P since Syria – rather, RC on one side and IBSA on the other overview

  3. Russia and China – R2P sceptics/rejectionists? India– ambivalent; concerns over 3rd pillar Brazil - R2P not a new norm; emphasised 1st and 2nd pillars; warned of risks with 3rd pillar South Africa – general support but preference for non-coercive measures eg. negotiation Brics and r2p prior to libya

  4. Brics and libya

  5. Brics and syria

  6. BRICS unable to maintain a single, unified position on Syria Split into 2 sub-groups: Russia, China (RC) – strong opposition to any coercive measures against Syria India, Brazil, Sth Africa (IBSA) – more flexible stances, though still cautious about R2P’s 3rdpillar RC vs. IBSA

  7. RC –likely to continue strong opposition to implementation of 3rd pillar • IBSA – more flexible, unpredictable stances; remain suspicious about regime change • Brazil’s ‘Responsibility while Protecting’ (RwP) as a way forward? • criticism of RwP has dampened Brazil’s enthusiasm to act as a norm entrepreneur The brics and r2P in the future?

More Related