540 likes | 740 Views
RAILWAY OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT- EUROPEAN RAILWAY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ERTMS) AND TELEMATICS APPLICATION FROM RAILWAY FREIGHT SERVICES-EXPERIENCES IN MEMBER STATES II.
E N D
RAILWAY OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT- EUROPEAN RAILWAY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ERTMS) AND TELEMATICS APPLICATION FROM RAILWAY FREIGHT SERVICES-EXPERIENCES IN MEMBER STATES II TAIEX Event organized in co-operation withMinistry of Transport of Republic of BulgariaRailway Administration Executive Agency
INDEX The challenge of the freight transport by Rail Safety and Interoperability ERTMS and TAF The Spanish experience II ERTMS Corridors and freight experiences (D) Conclusions and Recomendations - List of the documentation used
The challenge of the freight transport by Rail RAIL FREIGHT Market Panaroma in EUROPE Recent Past 45% Share Today < 12% Alternative “Do Nothing” Today < 12% Tomorrow < 3% Alternative “Interoperability & Safety” Today < 12% Tomorrow > 40% Alternative “Other one” Today < 12% Tomorrow ?
The challenge of the freight transport by Rail Problems and Solution for the freight transport by Rail “Thousand” Problems A B One Solution = Uninterrupted traffic 100km/h? A B But…custom oriented transport eficiency and cost effectiveness is mandatory
The challenge of the freight transport by Rail • MAIN PROBLEMS AREAS • Technical • Management ERTMS + Telematics • Commercial • Organizational • Funding National Governments + EU • Political • … Partial solutions don´t have money returns! (critical mass is necessary)
The challenge of the freight transport by Rail • Beside EU Directives, • The freight transport by Rail is a “must” because of: • Negative external efects of the Road mode • Main international Roads axes congested • Free rail capacity is still available • Dangereous goods transport more safe
The challenge of the freight transport by Rail Comparison road and rail freight transport: cost per tkm in €ct/tkm
Safety and Interoperability Interoperability for common technical language Interoperability to improve safety Interoperability to improve quality Interoperability to reduce transport costs Interoperability to avoid external costs (Road) Interoperability to increase the Freight traffic Interoperability to satisfy real customers demand
Safety and Interoperability Engineering Babel Tower
ERTMS is the new signaling and management system for Europe, enabling interoperability throughout the European Rail Network
ERTMS European Strategy Supportedby EC Designedby EU Railways and SupplyIndustry ERTMS ETCS (Speed control) GSM-R (exchangevoice & data infobetweentrack and train
ERTMS European Strategy • Benefits of ERTMS • Long term cost reduction (life cycle cost management) • Highest level of Safety • More train frequency • Interoperability through: • Standardization • Reduction of technical barriers • Easier cross-borders operations • Fair competition possible
ERTMS European Strategy In june 2004, the Chairman of UNISIG, Dan Otteborn (Bombardier) stressed that ERTMS is ready now. "Let's deploy it before it becomes obsolete," ERTMS has already been successfully implemented in a large number of countries in Europe and has shown how the signaling systems of different suppliers can work together by following common specifications. It is now crucial for rail freight competitiveness that ERTMS be implemented along the 6 main freight corridors across Europe to reduce implementation costs
Telematic Application for Freights TAF TELEMATICS The use of both communications and information technology to assist management and control of (transport) companies
Telematic Application for Freights TAF TAF = interoperability of information The TAF TSI is a European regulation that requires the railway industry to develop and implement common standards to increase the interoperability of information required for rail freight
Telematic Application for Freights TAF TAF = exchange of information between companies The TAF TSI exists to facilitate the exchange of information between companies regarding rail freight services, notably as far as cross-border and multi-company services are concerned
Telematic Application for Freights TAF Is an open data layer across all rail actors It is Compulsory; - Regulation on 18thJanuary 2006 - Implementation commitment of the rail actors is documented in the Strategic European Deployment Plan (SEDP), submitted to the EC in January 2007 John Lutz is the Deployment Team Manager (UIC) www.uic.asso.fr/uic/presentations/lutz.pdf ( TAF-TSI Rollout Common Tender and Industry Development UIC e-Business Conference 11 October 2007) Project link = http://www.uic.asso.fr/baseinfo/projet/projet.php?id=15
Telematic Application for Freights TAF Steering Board is chaired by a committee and experienced person of CEO status (Jan Sundling,Chairman) Committee formed of a specific number of nominated representatives from the Stakeholders and Associations (UIC, CER, EIM, ERFA, CIT, etc.) Membership is still open to those who wish to participate. Responsibilities of the Steering Board cover the following: –To Steer and prioritise implementation programme –To Support the Deployment Manager, who will act as the overall Programme Manager on a day to day basis. –To Provide formal liaison with the European Commission on compliance, through the Chairman.
Telematic Application for Freights TAF TAF/TSI MAIN FUNCTIONS Freight train path reservation –ad-hoc and instant capacity Marshalling and train preparation Monitoring of freight wagons and freight trains Connections with other freight modes Production of accompanying electronic documents.
Telematic Application for Freights TAF UIC leaflets do cover Leaflet 428-1 - International sorting system for wagonload traffic. Leaflet 419-2 - Analytical numbering of international freight trains. Leaflet 438-2 - Identification marking for freight rolling stock. Leaflet 920-1 - Standard numerical coding for railway undertakings, infrastructure managers and others companies involved in rail-transport chains. Leaflet 920-2 - Standard numerical coding of locations. Leaflet 920-10 - Standard numerical code for railway customers.
Telematic Application for Freights TAF The political intention behind the regulation is to boost the quality and productivity of rail freight in Europe, in the context of an increasing road competition.
The Spanish experience II Situation of Renfe in 1986
The Spanish experience II Strategic Plan for Transport Infrastructures (PEIT 2005-2020) for improving the whole of the Spanish Network with sustainable concepts 2. A real political decision to invest on railways infrastructure, more than in roads 3. A clear committment with interoperability and Safety
The Spanish experience II Environmental advantage RAIL/ROAD for 10 years Traffic 19.930.000.000 € Difference between External costs RAIL/ROAD Savings to the State amounting to 13.760.000.000 € generated with 10 years Rail Traffic 6.170.000 € Subsidies from State Average saving per Year = 1.376.000.000 €
ERTMS Corridors and freight experiences Creation of corridor structures by the Member States and infrastructure managers as part of the development of ERTMS along 6 major European routes that are important for freight. This initiative, which for each corridor is based on a letter of intent signed at ministerial level, is backed by a European coordinator appointed by the Commission. The main measures proposed in this communication have been inspired by this venture.
The challenge of the freight transport by Rail Market Panaroma 6 ERTMS Corridors 13.000 km 20% Rail freights 6% of the EU Track lines
ERTMS Corridors and freight experiences Telematics Initiatives of the Players: – Development of interoperability, in particular by way of the Technical Specification for Interoperability relating to Traffic Operations and Management (TOM TSI) and the deployment of the Technical Specification for Interoperability relating to Telematics Applications for Freight (TAF TSI) – Introduction of Europtirails, which informs its users in real time on train positions and possible delays in a number of Member States – Creation of RailNetEurope (RNE), which, in particular, offers its customers international train paths and is a useful coordination tool for most infrastructure managers
Situation in ERTMS Corridor D; Valencia-Budapest • 3 Electrification systems • 10 Signaling systems • 21 Intermodal sites • 6 main ports • 5 loading gauges • 6 maximum speeds • 25% not GSM-R (100% 2015) • Similar variety in the rolling stock
ERTMS in EU Corridors and freight experiences TRAVEL TIME FOR CORRIDOR D MAX TRAVEL TIME NOW > 40-70 hours ONCE ERTMS FULL DEPLOYED AND TAF WORKING, TRAVEL TIME HORIZON 2012-2015 CAN BE REDUCED TO: MAX TRAVEL TIME < 30 hours
SloveniaHungary 2004 : 10 2020 : 25 Number of trains / day, both ways Györ PARIS DIJON Hodos LJUBLJANA ZURICH BERN BUDAPEST Milano LYON Koper Venezia Torino Avignon Montpellier Genova Italy Slovenia 2004 : 11 2020 : 55 Bologna Marseille Perpignan Lérida Figueras FranceItaly Via Modane 2004 : 74 2020 : 129* ROMA Barcelona MADRID FranceSpain 2004 : 30 (Cerbère-Portbou) 2020 : 57 (Perpignan-Figueras) Valencia * Including rolling road : 40 between Aiton & Orbassano SEVILLA SOURCES : Modèle transpyrénéen, ADIF,TP FERRO, LTF, PIS SZ Situation in Corridor D; Valencia-Budapest Total increase + 300%
Conclusions and Recomendations The Member States should be required to equip ERTMS with first priority on the European freight corridors Besides other Telematics applications, TAF is the second (compulsory) challenge to meet for full customer orientation and fair competition for freights The Commission should (will) support for a consistent European Master Plan for ERTMS UIC to continue with the TAF Task force (John Lutz) One stop shop orientation is (always) mandatory