1 / 8

HPCB

HPCB. Spring meeting, 30-th June 2008. Discussion Groups:. Group 1 – Sam Mars Paul Steenbergen Foyer Group 2 – Ramin Parsa-Parsi Dames Foyer Group 3 – Laurent Louette Staircases between Dames Foyer en Paul Steenbergen Foyer Group 4 – Paul Vinke Nassau Foyer (down the stairs, 2-nd floor).

judson
Download Presentation

HPCB

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HPCB Spring meeting, 30-th June 2008

  2. Discussion Groups: • Group 1 – Sam Mars • Paul Steenbergen Foyer • Group 2 – Ramin Parsa-Parsi • Dames Foyer • Group 3 – Laurent Louette • Staircases between Dames Foyer en Paul Steenbergen Foyer • Group 4 – Paul Vinke • Nassau Foyer (down the stairs, 2-nd floor)

  3. Group 1: Sam Mars • Information wanted by competent auths not the same as wanted by the public • Most have websites but information available differs • Greater issue is the information used in advertising personal websites & directories • Suggestion – public register portal. Link to websites (how often do they update?)

  4. Group 2: Doctors right to privacy in balance against public right to information. Two models: • Basic information and reactive information sharing • Information on disciplinary actions and pro-active information sharing. >> Discussion on ongoing cases and final cases.

  5. Group 3: • many information on the websites, mostly contact details and academic bio. • Disciplinary measures should be available to regulators, even if the case is ongoing. • Main obstacles are national laws on privacy and data protection. • regulators should try to avoid professionals with disciplinary measures to migrate to other countries

  6. Group 4 • Information made public (websites) on ‘good and bad guys’ varies from everything to nothing. • Result of legal or statutory obligation • More transparency through political, professional and attitude changes • Importance of stopping bad apples to STOP working and to retrain where possible

  7. Overall conclusions • Strong support of the strands 1 & 2 of the Portugal Agreement • Diverse approach of regulation – but regulation of qualifications should go hand in hand with continued performance enhancement and assurance of current competence. • Consistent approach of assessment and registration of non-EEA graduates.

  8. Future Steps • Concrete feedback from all HPCB participants. • Feedback on achievements of HPCB within EEA countries. • Delivery of all actions contained in Portugal Agreement.

More Related