E N D
1. 1 Workshop on Mergers & AcquisitionsFebruary 17, 2005 presented
byMohit Saraf
PartnerLuthra and Luthra Law Offices
2. 2 Why M&A? Underlying Principle for
M&A Transactions
2 + 2 ? 4
Additional Value of “Synergy”
3. 3 Why M&A? Market Intensification:
Horizontal Integration – Buying a competitor
Acquisition of equity stake in IBP by IOC
AT&T merger into SBC enables the latter to access the corporate customer base and exploit the predictable cash flows typical of this telephony section
Market Extensions – New markets for Present products
Maersk – Pipavav : strategic objective of investing in a container terminal in the west coast
Bharat Forge’s acquisition of CDP (Germany)
S&P’s proposed acquisition of CRISIL
4. 4 Why M&A? Vertical Integration : Internalization of crucial forward or backward activities
Vertical Forward Integration – Buying a customer
Indian Rayon’s acquisition of Madura Garments along with brand rights
Vertical Backward Integration – Buying a supplier
IBM’s acquisition of Daksh
5. 5 Why M&A? Diversification: Overcome Barriers to Entry
Product Extension: New product in Present territory
P&G acquires Gillette to expand its product offering in the household sector and smooth out fluctuations in earning
Free-form Diversification: New product & New territories
Flight Centre’s proposed acquisition of Friends Globe
Indian Rayon’s acquisition of PSI Data Systems
6. 6 Why M&A? Advantages:
Greater Economic Clout:
Proposed merger of Petroleum PSUs
P&G merger with Gillette expected to correct balance of power between suppliers and retailers.
Economies of scale and Sharing Overheads: Size really does matter
IOC & IBP
Synthesized capabilities
Proposed merger of nationalized banks
7. 7 M&A Different Perspectives Acquirer
Majority/ Strategic Partner
Minority/ Private Equity Investor
Target Company
8. 8 M&ATRANSACTION ISSUES: TARGET Due Diligence – Full Disclosures
Linked with Reps & Warranties
Reps should be negative
DD in case of Listed Company
Post Closing Adjustment
Condition Precedents – Definitive
Include as Exhibits
Survival of Reps for limited period
9. 9 M&ATRANSACTION ISSUES: ACQUIRER Due Diligence – Risk Matrix and Value Depletor
Material Contracts
Any subsisting contracts granting similar or superior rights to other investors
Termination rights of major customers
Approval rights of financiers
Title to Properties & Assets: esp. where main business is situated
Statutory Dues
Litigation : Contingent Liabilities
IPR protection
Tax Compliance (Settlement Commission)
10. 10 M&ATRANSACTION ISSUES: ACQUIRER Mode of Acquisition
Pure Equity (Existing or New); Equity & Preference; Special Class (Differential voting rights, dividends or otherwise)
Leveraged Acquisitions
Corporate Governance
Related Party Transactions (past & going forward)
Board Representation
Quorum (Inclusive)
Fiduciary Responsibility of Board v. Shareholders
11. 11 M&ATRANSACTION ISSUES: ACQUIRER Deadlock Resolution
Majority/ Strategic Partner
Lenders
Return on Investment
Cap on dividends to preference shares
Liquidation Preference
Lock - in of Promoters
Enforceability of transferability restrictions
12. 12 M&ATRANSACTION ISSUES: ACQUIRER Non - Compete/ Non - Solicitation
Payment for Goodwill to exiting partner
Exclusivity
Enforceability against Company
Company as party to SHA
Exit Options
Listing (Private Equity)
Call/ Put Option
13. 13 M&ATRANSACTION ISSUES: GENERAL Effectiveness of SHA and SPA
Indemnity
Aggregate Liability Cap
De Minimis
Threshold
Participative Rights v. Protective Rights
Strategic Partner : Participative Rights
Control on Board
Sharing Control
Private Equity : Protective Rights
14. 14 M&ATRANSACTION ISSUES: GENERAL Special Rights
Tag – Along Rights: minority partner/ private equity
Drag - Along Rights: majority partner
Right to share the upside on revised valuation of Target eg: on Merger; Listing at higher valuation
Right of First Refusal
Earn-out Structure
Favorable Business Projections
15. 15 M&ATRANSACTION ISSUES: GENERAL FCPA
Arbitration v. Litigation: Effective Remedy
Proper Law of Arbitration
ICC v. UNICITRAL
Group Companies Doctrine
Place of Arbitration
Cost Effective
16. 16 M&AREGULATORY FRAMEWORK
17. 17 M&A OVERVIEW Mergers Spin Offs Acquisitions
18. 18 ACQUISITIONS Acquisition
Shares
Control
Acquisition of Assets
Slump Sale
19. 19 AcquisitionsISSUES: COMPANIES ACT Sections 108A to G: Central Government approval if in excess of threshold prescribed
ambiguity as to ‘classification of goods’
Section 372A: Compliance by transferee company in acquisition of shares
Section 77A: Buy Back may be used as a defense to a hostile takeover
Used in U.S.: PeopleSoft’s attempt to thwart Oracle
20. 20 AcquisitionsISSUES: FEMA Acquirer - Non-Resident:
No approval required for purchase of shares (including existing shares)
From R
From NR
Valuation prescribed in case of R-NR not less than
Ruling Market Price - Listed Target Company
Fair valuation by a CA as per CCI guidelines - Unlisted Target Company
Press Note 18 replaced by Press Note 1 of 2005
Investment has to comply with FDI policy
21. 21 AcquisitionsISSUES: FEMA Target Company is a Non-Resident
Direct investment in JV/ WOS outside India (other than financial services) requires no approval subject to conditions including inter alia
Financial commitment < or = 100% networth
Investment by way of remittance only if valuation
If > 5 million USD: by Merchant Banker/ Investment Banker registered with SEBI/ appropriate authorities
Other cases: by CA/ CPA
Investment by share swap: valuation by Merchant Banker/ Investment Banker registered with SEBI/ appropriate authorities
22. 22 AcquisitionsISSUES: TAKEOVER CODE Definition of “Control” - Inclusive
Ambiguous:
TATA Sellout in ACC.
Negative control?
S. 25(2) prohibits public offers after 21 days of the public announcement of first public offer
In case of indirect acquisition, foreign acquirer has three months from completion of transaction to make open offer. Therefore, foreign transactions can be concluded prior to open offer in India.
23. 23 Acquisitions RECENT CHANGES : TAKEOVER CODE
New thresholds of 54% and 74% in Regulation 7
55% shares cannot be allotted by preferential allotment or market purchase – consolidation by public offer only
Acquisition by public offer under 11(2) can be for only so many shares as will keep float above listing requirements.
Where any acquisition reduces public float below Listing Agreement requirements, acquisition to comply with delisting guidelines
Where Code is triggered by a global deal, if the public offer will lower float to below the listing requirement, then acquirer has 12 months to raise float either by fresh issue or by disinvestment.
24. 24 AcquisitionsISSUES: MISC Stamp Duty
No stamp duty if transferred shares are dematerialized
Industrial Disputes Act (s. 25FF)
Workmen employed by transferor company entitled to retrenchment benefits unless retained in employment on same terms.
25. 25 Mergers Mergers
Spin-offs
Demergers
26. 26 MergersSTRUCTURE 1 A = Amalgamating Company: Ceases to Exist
B = Amalgamated Company
B receives all of A’s assets and liabilities
Shareholders of A receive shares in B and maybe other benefits like debentures, cash
Transfer assets and liabilities
27. 27 MergersSTRUCTURE 2 A, B and C = Amalgamating Companies: Cease to exist
D = Amalgamated Company: may or may not have existed before Merger
All assets and liabilities of A, B and C transferred to D
Shareholders in A,B and C get shares in D.
28. 28 Spin-OffsSTRUCTURE
29. 29 DemergersSTRUCTURE Demergers are one type of spin-offs: under s. 391
A = Demerging Company
B = Resulting Company: may or may not have existed earlier
A transfers undertaking to B
B issues shares to shareholders of A
30. 30 Merger & DemergerPROCESS Phase- I
Draft Scheme
Notice to members of Board of both companies
Determine swap ratio based on valuation report
Board approval of both companies
Prior NoCs from secured creditors and shareholders for exemption from meeting: Reduce Time and Costs
In ICICI Ltd. merger with ICICI Bank, meeting of preference shareholders of ICICI Ltd. was dispensed with since sole preference shareholder furnished an NOC
Phase- II
Draft Application under s. 391(1)
Application to HCs in respective jurisdictions of both companies for sanction / direction to conduct meetings
Moving registered office to one jurisdiction: Reduce Time and Costs
31. 31 Merger & Demerger PROCESS
Phase- III
Notice of EGM to members with statement of terms of merger, interests of directors and proxy forms: 21 days
Advertisement
Notice in 2 newspapers: 21 days
Affidavit certifying compliance with HC’s directions in respect of notice/ advertisement
Meetings of creditors and/ or shareholders: agreed to by majority in number representing ľ of value present and voting
Chairman of meetings to file report within 7 days of meeting
Resolutions and Explanatory Statements to be filed with RoC
32. 32 Merger & Demerger PROCESS Phase- IV (Approval of the Scheme)
HC to be moved within 7 days of Chairman’s Report for second motion petition
10 days notice of hearing of petition in same newspapers
Notice to Central Govt. (Regional Director), and OL (if applicable): Submit reports
Objections raised in 391 proceedings
HC Sanction
Certified copy of HC Order to be filed with RoC within 30 days of order.
33. 33 Merger & DemergerISSUES: COMPANIES ACT s 391 - 394: “Complete Code”, “Single Window Clearance”
Reduction of capital- Position unclear, Predominance of judicial view: substantial compliance with s. 100- 102 required.
Transnational Mergers: 391 - 394 mechanism operates only where amalgamated company is Indian. E.g. of transnational merger concluded under 391 route - Bank of Muscat merging into Centurion Bank by order of Karnataka HC
Alternative Mechanism: S. 494
Through Liquidation Process
Liquidator transfers assets to foreign company for shares
Process has to be “altogether voluntary”
Tax benefits are unavailable under this route
34. 34 Other Spin-OffsISSUES: COMPANIES ACT Where spin-offs are outside the 391 mechanism, the following compliances need to be ensured
293(1)(a) resolution
Voting has to be by postal ballot in a public listed company
35. 35 Mergers and Demergers ISSUES: INCOME TAX
Transfer of capital assets by amalgamating company to amalgamated company is exempt from Capital Gains Tax provided amalgamated company is an Indian company
Capital Gains Exemption in respect of shares issued to members of amalgamating/ demerging company- s. 47
Exemption may not be available if members of amalgamating company receive anything besides shares in the amalgamated company like debentures or cash- Gujarat HC in Gautam Sarabhai v. CIT, 173 ITR 216.
36. 36 Mergers and Demergers ISSUES: INCOME TAX In case of fraction shares, issue to trustee who liquidates these and distributes money to shareholders of amalgamating company.
Carry forward of losses and unabsorbed depreciation provided the amalgamated company carry on the business of the amalgamating company for at least 5 years – s. 72A
Use of Reverse merger to meet above condition
Spin-off receives tax benefits under Income Tax Act only if it is a demerger
37. 37 Slump Sale ISSUES: TAXATION Slump Sale = Transfer of undertaking without itemizing individual assets and liabilities- s.2(42C) Income Tax Act
Treated as capital gains
If undertaking is older than 3 years, long term capital gains rates apply even if individual assets are new
Carry forward of losses and unabsorbed depreciation unavailable
38. 38 Merger & DemergersISSUES: SALES TAX No Sales tax on Amalgamation or demerger.
Where effective date is retrospective, any transfers between amalgamating company and amalgamated company retrospectively cease to be liable to sales tax- Mad HC Castrol Oil v. State of TN, 114 STC 468
Some Sales Tax enactments contain specific provisions to tax such transactions eg. S.33C, Bombay Sales Tax Act. No such provision in Central Sales Tax Act.
39. 39 MergerISSUES: STAMP DUTY Divergences between states: Shopping for beneficial rates usually pointless
Duty to be imposed on value of shares transferred not on individual assets transferred: Bom HC in Li Taka AIR 1997 Bom 7
States with Specific entries: Maharashtra, Karnataka, Rajasthan and Gujarat
40. 40 MergerISSUES: STAMP DUTY States without specific entries: Unclear if duty leviable.
Cal HC in Madhu Intra Ltd. v. ROC, 2004 (3) CHN 607 - 394 Order is not an instrument chargeable to duty
Supreme Court in Ruby Sales v. State of Maharashtra (1994) 1 SCC 531 - specific inclusion of civil court decrees in Bombay Stamp Act only abundant caution
1937 Notification under Indian Stamp Act, 1899 remits duty when merger is of a 90% subsidiary: Remission not available in states with own legislations eg. Kerala, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Gujarat and Rajasthan
Gujarat and Maharashtra have limits on stamp duty for mergers and demergers at Rs.10 crore and Rs. 25 crore.
41. 41 MergerISSUES: SEBI Acquisition of shares pursuant to a scheme of arrangement or reconstruction under any law, Indian or foreign – exempt from SEBI Takeover Code.
Exemption claimed unsuccessfully by Luxottica in the acquisition of Ray Ban Sun Optics India
Listing Agreement:
Scheme before the Court/ Tribunal must not violate, override or circumscribe the securities laws or stock exchange requirements
Disclosure required
42. 42 MergerISSUES: SEBI Shares allotted by unlisted transferee company to shareholders of listed transferor company under a HC sanctioned scheme – can be listed without an IPO subject to conditions (DIP).
Eg. Dabur Pharmaceuticals
Constitutes ‘Price Sensitive Information’ in terms of Insider Trading Regulations.
Compliance with Delisting Guidelines if public shareholding below prescribed limit.
43. 43 MergersMISCELLANEOUS ISSUES Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999
Where the amalgamated company is Indian, non resident shareholders of the foreign amalgamating company require RBI approval to receive shares.
Where the amalgamated company is foreign, the issue of its shares to Indian shareholders requires RBI approval.
Automatic route available where non residents have to be issued shares in a merger of Indian companies.
44. 44 MergersMISCELLANEOUS ISSUES
Human Resources
Workmen entitled to retrenchment benefits unless retained in employment on same terms.
Adjustments of pay scale needs to be resolved.
Global Trust employees were retained on same terms in OBC. Pay packages of former GTB staff could be altered only after 3 years. OBC management had to contend with GTB’s complex salary structure.
45. 45 Mergers & Acquisitions COMPETITION LAW Monopolistic and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969
Status: Repealing provision in Competition Act, 2002 not notified.
No Central Government approval required for a merger or acquisition under the MRTPA
Act attracted only if amalgamated company discovered to be monopolistic in its working not at stage of amalgamation- Hindustan Lever, 1995 Supp (1) SCC 499
46. 46 Mergers & Acquisitions COMPETITION LAW Competition Act, 2002 (Partially notified)
Merger or Acquisition = “Combination” if stipulated thresholds respecting aggregate asset or turnover are exceeded
Prior approval of combination is not mandatory
Test – “Cause or likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition within the relevant market”