170 likes | 714 Views
API SC6 Winter Meeting New Business: API Spec 6A Tensile Test Specimen Requirements. Tim Haeberle 8 February 2011. Contents. 1. Correction Of Metric Equivalent For Tensile Test Specimens - ISO Version 2. Clarification Of Spec Reference For Tensile Test Specimens
E N D
API SC6 Winter MeetingNew Business:API Spec 6A Tensile Test Specimen Requirements Tim Haeberle 8 February 2011
Contents 1. Correction Of Metric Equivalent For Tensile Test Specimens - ISO Version 2. Clarification Of Spec Reference For Tensile Test Specimens 3. Clarification Of Tensile Test Acceptance Criteria For Mandrel Tubing Hangers And Casing Hangers
The Problem CURENT WORDING – ISO Version: • 5.6.4.1 (for TC’s for PSL 1) “Standard-sized, 12,7 mm (0,500 in) diameter tensile specimens shall be used to qualify carbon, low-alloy and stainless steels, unless the physical configuration of the TC prevents their use. In this case, the standard sub-size specimens referenced in ASTM A370 may be used. Either standard 12,7 mm (0,500 in) or standard sub-size specimens (see ASTM A370) may be used to qualify CRA materials.” • 5.7.4.1 (for QTC’s for PSL 2-4) “Standard-sized, 12,7 mm (0,500 in) diameter tensile specimens shall be used, unless the physical configuration of the QTC prevents their use. In this case, the standard sub-size specimens referenced in ASTM A370 may be used.” PROBLEM: • ASTM A370 specifies the metric equivalent for the 0,500 in specimen as 12,5mm, not 12,7 mm.
The Solution PROPOSED EDITORIAL CORRECTIONS – ISO Version: • 5.6.4.1 “Standard-sized, 12,5 mm (0,500 in) diameter tensile specimens shall be used to qualify carbon, low-alloy and stainless steels, unless the physical configuration of the TC prevents their use. In this case, the standard sub-size specimens referenced in ASTM A370 may be used. Either standard 12,5 mm (0,500 in) or standard sub-size specimens (see ASTM A370) may be used to qualify CRA materials.” • 5.7.4.1 “Standard-sized, 12,5 mm (0,500 in) diameter tensile specimens shall be used, unless the physical configuration of the QTC prevents their use. In this case, the standard sub-size specimens referenced in ASTM A370 may be used.” JUSTIFICATION: • The metric equivalent dimension needs to be corrected to match what is specified in ASTM A370, the referenced standard. • The API Version has been corrected in Annex O.
The Problem CURRENT WORDING • 5.3.5.2 PSL 2 to 4 tensile testing (for mandrel tubing hangers and casing hangers) “b) test method: Perform tensile tests at room temperature in accordance with the procedures specified in ISO 6892-1or ASTM A370. Perform a minimum of one tensile test. The results of the tensile test(s) shall satisfy the manufacturer’s specified requirements.” • 5.4.2.3 PSL 2 to 4 tensile testing (for bodies, bonnets, and end and outlet connections) “b) test method: Perform tensile tests at room temperature in accordance with the procedures specified in ISO 6892-1or ASTM A370. Perform a minimum of one tensile test. The results of the tensile test(s) shall satisfy the applicable requirements of Table 6.”
The Problem CURRENT WORDING • Section 5.6.4.1 (for TC’s for PSL 1) Paragraph 5 - “Standard-sized, 12,7 mm (0,500 in) diameter tensile specimens shall be used to qualify carbon, low-alloy and stainless steels, unless the physical configuration of the TC prevents their use. In this case, the standard sub-size specimens referenced in ASTM A370 may be used. Either standard 12,7 mm (0,500 in) or standard sub-size specimens (see ASTM A370) may be used to qualify CRA materials.” • Section 5.7.4.1 (for QTC’s for PSL 2-4) Paragraph 6 - “Standard-sized, 12,7 mm (0,500 in) diameter tensile specimens shall be used, unless the physical configuration of the QTC prevents their use. In this case, the standard sub-size specimens referenced in ASTM A370 may be used.” PROBLEM: • These paragraphs do not state that the “standard” specimens are ASTM standard-sized specimens, although they do state that when sub-size specimens are used, they shall be the ASTM A370 standard sub-size specimens. This leaves open the use of ISO 6892-1 standard specimens.
The Solution PROPOSED REVISIONS: • Section 5.6.4.1 Paragraph 5 - “ASTM A370standard-sized, 12,5 mm (0,500 in) diameter tensile specimens shall be used to qualify carbon, low-alloy and stainless steels, unless the physical configuration of the TC prevents their use. In this case, the standard sub-size specimens referenced in ASTM A370 may be used. Either standard 12,5 mm (0,500 in) or standard sub-size specimens (see ASTM A370) may be used to qualify CRA materials.” • Section 5.7.4.1 Paragraph 6 - “ASTM A370standard-sized, 12,5 mm (0,500 in) diameter tensile specimens shall be used, unless the physical configuration of the QTC prevents their use. In this case, the standard sub-size specimens referenced in ASTM A370 may be used.”
The Solution JUSTIFICATION: • “ASTM A370” needs to be added to clarify that the only specimen sizes currently permitted are the ASTM A370 specimen sizes. • ISO 6892-1 includes different size specimens that have a higher gage length to diameter ratio. • The longer relative gage length in the ISO 6892-1 specimens can result in failure to meet the API 6A specified elongation acceptance criteria. • The use of ASTM A370 specimen sizes meets ISO 6892-1, since ISO 6892-1, section 6.1.1, paragraphs 7 and 8 state: “The dimensional tolerances of the test pieces shall be in accordance with the Annexes B to E (see 6.2).” Other test pieces such as those specified in relevant product standards or national standards may be used by agreement with the customer, e.g. ISO 3183 [1] (API 5L), ISO 11960 [2] (API 5CT), ASTM A370[6], ASTM E8M [7], DIN 50125 [10], IACS W2 [13], and JIS Z2201 [14]”. • ASTM A370 specimen sizes are routinely used in the US and Europe.
Tensile Test Acceptance Criteria For Mandrel Tubing Hangers And Casing Hangers
The Problem CURRENT WORDING • 5.3.5.2 PSL 2 to 4 tensile testing (for mandrel tubing hangers and casing hangers) “b) test method: Perform tensile tests at room temperature in accordance with the procedures specified in ISO 6892-1 or ASTM A370. Perform a minimum of one tensile test. The results of the tensile test(s) shall satisfy the manufacturer’s specified requirements.” • 5.4.2.3 PSL 2 to 4 tensile testing (for bodies, bonnets, and end and outlet connections) “b) test method: Perform tensile tests at room temperature in accordance with the procedures specified in ISO 6892-1 or ASTM A370. Perform a minimum of one tensile test. The results of the tensile test(s) shall satisfy the applicable requirements of Table 6.” • API 6A Table 6, column 2 (for bodies, bonnets, and end and outlet connections) “0,2% offset yield strength”.
The Problem PROBLEM: • The yield strength acceptance criteria for bodies, bonnets, and end and outlet connections is limited to the 0,2% offset method yield strength values in Table 6. This is good! • However, for mandrel hangers it is up to the manufacturer to specify not only the yield strength in MPa (psi), but also the method of determining the yield strength. • Unfortunately, if the manufacturer does not specify the method of determining the yield strength, methods other than the 0,2% offset method may be used, and these may give higher or lower values than would be obtained if the 0,2% offset method were used.
The Solution PROPOSED REVISION: • 5.3.5.2 PSL 2 to 4 tensile testing (for mandrel tubing hangers and casing hangers) “b) test method: Perform tensile tests at room temperature in accordance with the procedures specified in ISO 6892-1 or ASTM A370. Perform a minimum of one tensile test. The results of the tensile test(s) shall satisfy the manufacturer’s specified requirements. The 0,2% offset method shall be used for determination of the yield strength”. JUSTIFICATION: • A standardized method of determining the yield strength needs to be used for mandrel casing and tubing hangers.