1 / 34

Overview

US Joint Forces Command’s Production Process: Establishing Horizontal Integration Presentation to Net-centric Operations (NCO) Implementation Process Alignment (NIPA) Conference COL Stan Hoskin Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff – Integration (ADCoS-I) 3 November 2005. Overview. Agenda.

jun
Download Presentation

Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. US Joint Forces Command’sProduction Process: Establishing Horizontal Integration Presentation to Net-centric Operations (NCO) Implementation Process Alignment (NIPA) Conference COL Stan Hoskin Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff – Integration (ADCoS-I) 3 November 2005 Overview

  2. Agenda • USJFCOM Mission & History • Net-Centric Production • Horizontal Integration • Production Process

  3. United States Joint Forces Command Mission & History

  4. USJFCOM Mission USJFCOM maximizes the Nation’s future and present military capabilities by leading the transformation of joint forces, - all to support the Combatant Commands.

  5. Dual-hatted: NATO Supreme Allied Commander Transformation Dual-hatted: NATO Supreme Allied Commander Transformation Global Force Mgr Global Force Provider Global Force Mgr Global Force Provider SUPREME ALLIED COMMAND, ATLANTIC (SACLANT) ALLIED COMMAND TRANSFORMATION (AC-T) June 19, 2003 Evolution of Joint Forces Command • USACOM US Joint Forces Command • leads Joint Deployment Process • enhanced joint training • establishes Joint requirements Atlantic Command US Atlantic Command commands US-based forces Joint Integration and Interoperability Transformation Road Map 1993 1995 1997 1998 1999 2002 2003 . . 2005 Shift to a Functional Command Joint Training and Integration of assigned forces Joint Experimentation and Partnership for Peace Organize, Train, Equip Joint Task Force HQ Multinational & Interagency

  6. Department of Defense Priorities • Pursue the Global War on Terrorism • Defeat Improvised Explosive Devices • Strengthen Combined/Joint Warfighting Capabilities • Transform the Joint Force • Intelligence Capabilities • Transforming DoD Management • Focus on People

  7. Unified Command Plan 2004 • USJFCOM lead development of Joint training and readiness standards for JTF Headquarters • USJFCOM lead for Jointconcept development and experimentation • USJFCOM lead for multinational and interagency integration and interoperability • USJFCOM lead development of a common JointCommand and Control system • USJFCOM assigned as Primary Joint Force Provider

  8. Training and Doctrine Command Marine Corps Concept Development Command Navy Warfare Development Command Air Force Doctrine Center UNCLASSIFIED JFCOM Forces FLTFORCOM ACC 6 Carrier Strike Groups 6 Expeditionary Strike Groups 4 Numbered AFs 21 Wings 88,000 Airmen 101,000 Sailors 64,000 Airmen (RC/NG) 88,000 Sailors (RC) FORSCOM MARFORLANT 6 Divisions 7 Sep Brigades/ Regiments 1 Division 1 Wing 1 FSSG 40,750 Marines 198,000 Soldiers 41,000 Marines (RC) 1,163,750 Personnel 63% Reserve 543,000 Soldiers (RC/NG) UNCLASSIFIED

  9. Army Forces Air Forces Marine Forces Navy Forces Deconflict Service Forces

  10. Deconflict Service Forces Army Forces Air Forces Army Forces Air Forces Marine Forces Navy Forces Marine Forces Navy Forces Coordinate Stitch Service Seams

  11. Deconflict Service Forces Coordinate Stitch Service Seams Army Forces Air Forces Army Forces Air Forces Army Forces Air Forces Marine Forces Marine Forces Navy Forces Navy Forces SOF Marine Forces Navy Forces Integration of Service Capabilities

  12. Army Forces Air Forces Army Forces Air Forces Army Forces Air Forces Marine Forces Marine Forces Marine Forces Navy Forces Navy Forces Navy Forces SOF SOF SOF Interagency Attributes of a Transforming Joint Force The Operator’s Approach Integrate Services/SOCOM Capabilities Coherently Integrate Interdependent, Collaborative, Learning & Adaptive Coherently Joint Force DeconflictService Forces Coordinate Stitch Service Seams ? Multinational Multinational Result: Effects-Based Outcomes Supported/Supporting Relationships

  13. Emerging Engagement Strategy Emerging Operational Capability Deconflict Integration Interdependent Coordinate Army Forces Air Forces Army Forces Air Forces Army Forces Air Forces Interagency Service - - Individual and Unit Training Marine Forces Marine Forces Marine Forces Navy Forces Navy Forces Navy Forces SOF SOF SOF Multinational Joint Training Interagency Training Multi-National Training Traditional Emerging Objective Notional Training Context

  14. JFCOM’s Transformation Engines Joint Concept Development and Experimentation Building tomorrow’s joint force today Joint Force Integration and Interoperability Joint Force Provider Integration Trained and Ready Forces today are the foundation for transformation for tomorrow Joint Force Trainer Integrating all enterprises to create coherently joint and combined forces and interdependent capabilities

  15. { Army 30% Navy 34% Air Force 25% Marine Corps 11% Unique Headquarter Functions 34% Military 24% Civilian 42% Contractor Chief of Staff RC RC 2 SES 4 SES RC J-6 J-7 J-8 J-9 SJFHQ JCOA JOINT TRAINING JOINT TASK FORCE HEADQUARTERS CORE ELEMENT REQUIREMENTS INTEGRATION JOINT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT & EXPERIMENTATION JOINT CENTER OPERATIONANALYSIS Joint Transformation Command- Intelligence Special Ops Command, JFCOM Joint Warfighting Center Joint Futures Lab 1 SES Joint Warfare Analysis Center 1 SES Joint Personnel Recovery Agency Joint Communications Support Element Joint Fires Integration and Interoperability Team Joint Systems Integration Command Dedicated Organization Commander 3 SES* Deputy Commander Command Sergeant Major Chief of Staff Political Advisor 2 SES RC J-1 J-2 J-3/4 J-5 J-6 PERSONNEL OPERATIONS PLANS LOGISTICS COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE STRATEGY POLICY ANALYSIS

  16. Delivering Product to the Joint Force Commander + Traditional Organization Task Organize

  17. United States Joint Forces Command Net-Centric Production

  18. Net-Centricity • An information superiority concept of operations • Effects Based Operations • Coherently Joint • Fully Networked Decision makers, Shooters, Sensors and Systems • Shared Real Time Situational Awareness • Increased Speed of Command • Information/Knowledge Superiority • Supports Synchronized Non-contiguous Operations Enabling Decision Superiority - - but more so Decide, Act, Adapt

  19. Operational Net Assessment (ONA) • Joint Intel, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (JISR) • Intel Transformation • Decision Superiority • Effects-Based Operations (EBO) • Information Operations (IO) • Force Projection (JDPO) • Joint Tactical Actions (JTA) • Standing Joint Force Headquarters (SJFHQ) • Joint Interagency Coordination Group (JIACG) • Multinational Info • Sharing (MNIS) • Collaborative Info Environment (CIE) • Networked C2 (JBMC2) • Net-Centric Enterprise • Services (NCES) Enabling Net Centric Operations Transforming How We Think and Operate Knowledge Centric Thinking Differently Coherently Joint Effects Based Fully Networked

  20. Decision Making MethodologiesFrom: Hierarchical Model From: Parallel and Sequential

  21. Networked Model Maneuver C2 Intelligence Fires / Effects Protect Deployment and Support Collaborative and Simultaneous Action

  22. Level Level Level 1 2 3 Maneuver Maneuver Maneuver Intelligence Intelligence Intelligence C2 C2 C2 Fires / Effects Fires / Effects Fires / Effects Protect Protect Protect Deployment Support Deployment Support Deployment Support Networked Organizational Model Collaborative and Simultaneous Action

  23. United States Joint Forces Command Horizontal Production

  24. Within the Office of the Chief of Staff COS Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations (DCOS-O) Deputy Chief of Staff for Integration (DCOS-I) Directorates/Subordinate Commands Deputy Directors for Operations (DDOs) Deputy Directors for Integration (DDIs)

  25. One Director or Sub-Commander,Two Views • Directors/Sub-Commanders • Command-Level, Customer-Focused Perspective • Horizontal and Vertical Work • Vertical Production • Deputy Director for Operations • Supports directors for vertical • production in support of objectives • Coordinates staff work • -Refine Staff Taskers • -Refine Production Taskers • (coordinate with directorate DDI) • -Work Staff Taskers • DDI will identify requirements to • the DDO who will make prioritization • recommendations for competing • requirement within the Directorate • or Subordinate Command • Horizontal Integration • Deputy Director for Integration • Reports directly to Director or • Subordinate Commander • Support directors to facilitate & • coordinate horizontal integration • within their assigned Directorate • or Subordinate command and • across USJFCOM • Monitor & support progress • of command-level objectives • Inform directorates on • DDI efforts • Oversee mgmt of data for objective • reviews • Support development & • implementation of command • battle-rhythm for objectives

  26. DDI Responsibilities – Example: J8 (HP)

  27. DDI Responsibilities – Example: J8 (P)

  28. DDO DDI Responsibilities – Example: J8 (HP & P) J02G-J02M-J1-J2-J3-J4-J5-J6-J7-J9-CE-SOC-JCOA-JCSE-JPASE-JPRA-JRD-JSIC-JWAC DDI

  29. United States Joint Forces Command Production Process

  30. Key Steps in the Process Define the Tasker Develop the POA&M Develop Product Battle-Rhythm Routine Updates • Product Lead + • supporting organizations • define relationships • Refine mission analysis • Define Outcomes • HP IPTs to CDR, • DCDR • P IPTs to CoS, • Directors, Sub- • Commanders • COCOM Reviews • Service Reviews • DCOS-O assigns • lead organization • Organization assigns • Product Lead • Product Lead conducts • initial mission analysis • Establish meeting • times, rhythm • Utilize COIs, management • tools • Develop budget

  31. Production Process Customer Involvement DCOS-I Involvement DCOS-I SL’s DDI DDI Involvement PL’s DDI

  32. SOURCE, RAW DATA Imagery DTED Common Formats and Standards VPF UVMAP World Vector Shoreline (WVS) • Imagery: • National Imagery Transmission Format (NITF) • Geographic Tagged Image File Format (GeoTIFF) • Elevation: • Digital Terrain Elevation Data (DTED) • Feature: • Shape • Vector Product Format (VPF) • Vector Map (VMAP) • Urban Vector Map (UVMAP) • World Vector Shoreline (WVS) • Feature Foundation Data (FFD) • Cartographic: • Digital Nautical Chart (DNC) • 3-D Models: • Open Flight • JPEG 2000 Digital Nautical Chart (DNC) Feature Foundation Data (FFD) Data Correlation Operations Imagery Training DB DTED VPF DB Analysis VMAP,UVMAP WVS DB Planning DNC FFD Geospatial Data Producer DB Rehearsal Execution DB Experimentation DB Data Discovery and Management System Users Geospatial Production Process COMBATANT COMMANDERS TERRAIN & TARGET DATA SOURCES COMMERCIAL CIVIL (Homeland Defense) INPUTS FROM VARIOUS SOURCES 80% of Time and Cost! Correlated Data

  33. Interdependent Production of Joint CapabilitiesMultiple Views, Multiple Relationships Deliver a ‘Turn-Key’ C2 Capability for JTF HQs Improve MN, IA, & NGO Interoperability with JTF HQ Provide & Sustain Mission-Ready JTF HQs DJC2 Support Operation of COCOM’s SJFHQ/JCSE Provide Joint Context in Experimentation Provide Joint Context in Training Establish & Enforce C2 Integration & Interoperability Standards Improve Operational Intel Capabilities to Enhance JTF Commander Decision-making

  34. Summary • Focus on coherent support to the Joint Force Commander • The Joint Force Commander is asking for ‘turn-key’ solutions • Solutions require interdependently developed products and transformational outcomes

More Related