1 / 47

Lecture 8

Lecture 8. TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: A A A A A A A A A A A A. Overview. Final lecture today! Can cover the following topics today: . Sfermion , chargino and neutralino masses Fine Tuning

junior
Download Presentation

Lecture 8

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lecture 8 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAAAAAAAAAAA

  2. Overview Final lecture today! Can cover the following topics today: • Sfermion, chargino and neutralino masses • Fine Tuning • What this really means, how we may quantify it. • How LHC squark, gluino and Higgs searches affect this • Changing universality assumptions • Relaxing some constraints • Using different breaking scheme inspired constraints • Non-minimal Supersymmetry • Extend the chiral superfield content • Extend the gauge structure Can give overview of all or focus on one or two?

  3. MSSM ChiralSuperfield Content Left handed quark chiralsuperfields Conjugateof right handed quark superfields Note: left handed fermions are described by chiralsuperfields, right handed fermions by anti-chiralsuperfields. Superpotential is a function of chiralsuperfields only so we include right handed fermions by taking the conjugate, which transforms as a left handed superfield!

  4. MSSM Lagragngian density Superpotential With the gauge structure, superfield content and Superpotential now specified we can construct the MSSM Lagrangian.

  5. EWSB conditions For successful EWSB: With:

  6. Higgs Masses CP-even Higgs bosons CP-odd Higgs boson Goldstone bosons Charged Higgs boson

  7. Sfermion masses Softmass: Flavour diagonal postulate F-terms D-terms

  8. Sfermion masses Home exercise: find all the mistakes on the previous slide, then write in matrix form below and diagonalise.

  9. Chargino and Neutralino masses (Home exercise) Hints: Soft masses: Superpotential: VEVs Kahler potential:

  10. Chargino and Neutralino masses

  11. Chargino and Neutralino masses

  12. Chargino and Neutralino masses

  13. Our Approach PA & D.J.MillierPRD 76, 075010 (2007) Compare dimensionless variations in: ALL parameters vsALL observables Parameter space point, parameter spacevolume restricted by, `` `` Tuning:

  14. Our Approach PA & D.J.MillierPRD 76, 075010 (2007) Compare dimensionless variations in: parameters vsobservables Parameter space point, parameter spacevolume restricted by, `` `` Tuning: Probability of random point from lying in : But remember any parameter space point is incredibly unlikely if all equally likely (flat prior)! Fine tuning is when a special qualitative feature ( ) is far less likely that other typical case ( )

  15. Our Approach PA & D.J.MillierPRD 76, 075010 (2007) Compare dimensionless variations in: parameters vsobservables Parameter space point, parameter spacevolume restricted by, `` `` Tuning: Probability of random point from lying in : But what if : large for all points (or all values of O) Any G << F Global sensitivity (Anderson & Castano 1995)

  16. Our Approach PA & D.J.MillierPRD 76, 075010 (2007) Compare dimensionless variations in: parameters vsobservables Parameter space point, parameter spacevolume restricted by, `` `` Tuning: Probability of random point from lying in : But what if : large for all points (or all values of O) Any G << F Rescale to our expectation for

  17. Regardless of measure details, fine tuning is increased when searches increase mass limits on squarks and gluinos: Search pushes up. Larger cancellation required!

  18. Heavy stops Large soft masses and large one loop corrections Break cMSSM link between stop masses and light squarks and evade fine tuning What about the Higgs? A relatively heavy Higgs requires heavy stops LEP bound Tuning? Tentative LHC Higgs signal

  19. Fine Tuning Summary • Most important consideration at the LHC (by far) is what do we seec • Higgs? Beyond the standard model (BSM) signal? • If BSM signal is observed initially all efforts on understanding new physics. • Eventually will know if new physics solves Hierachy Problem • Residual tuning may also be a hint about highscale physics • If no SUSY signal? Where does that leave us? • Subjective question, depends on tuning measure, but also prejudice • Conventional wisdom: no observation ) SUSY is fine tuned! • Motivation for low energy SUSY weakened (doesn’t remove fine tuning). • No BSM signal at all • Hierarchy Problem motivated BSM models have tuning too. • Nature is fine tuned? • SM true up to Planck scale? • Or we need some great new idea

  20. Beyond the CMSSM (Relaxing high scale constraints) Non-universal Higgs MSSM (NUHM) Motivated since Higgs bosons do not fit into the same SU(5) or SO(10) GUT multiplets: 16 10 + 5* + 1 Color triplets 10 5 + 5*

  21. Beyond the CMSSM (Relaxing high scale constraints) Non-universal Higgs MSSM (NUHM) Motivated since Higgs bosons do not fit into the same SU(5) or SO(10) GUT multiplets: Very mild modification to the CMSSM Impact: Higgs masses not linked to other scalar masses so strongly easier to fit EWSB constraints and other observables

  22. Beyond the CMSSM (Relaxing high scale constraints) For universal gauginos we have a (one loop)relation: Testable predictions for gaugino universality! Non-universal Gaugino masses Breaks ratio get different gaugino mass patterns: One can also ignore the universality more parameters to consider the model with less prejudice, e.g. pMSSM

  23. Gauge Mediation In gauge mediated symmetry breakingthe SUSY breaking is transmitted from the hidden sector via SM gauge interactions of heavy messenger fields. ChiralMessenger fields couple to Hidden sector SUSY breaking in messenger spectrum SM Gauge interactions couple them to visible sector Loops from gauge interactions with virtual messengers flavour diagonal soft masses. Loop diagram: Soft mass relations imposed at messenger scale Non-universal soft gaugino masses since they depend on gauge interactions! More details and a more general definition given in Steve Abel’s lectures

  24. Minimal Gauge Mediated SUSY Breaking (mGMSB) Messenger fields form Complete SU(5) representations Number of SU(5) multiplets From EWSB as in CMSSM Messenger scale

  25. Beyond the MSSM Non-minimal Supersymmetry The fundamental motivations for Supersymmetry are: - The hierarchy problem (fine tuning) - Gauge Coupling Unification - Dark matter None of these require Supersymmetry to be realised in a minimal form. MSSM is not the only model we can consider!

  26. The  problem • The MSSM superpotential is written down before EWSB or SUSY breaking: )it should know nothing about the EW scale. ( ¹-parameter has the dimension of mass! • The superpotential contains a mass scale! ) • What mass should we use? Forbidden by symmetry The natural choices would be 0or MPlanck (or MGUT) Scale of origin ) • Phenomenological Constraints ) ¹¼ 0.1 -1 TeV

  27. Solve the -problem by introducing an extra singlet [Another way is to use the Giudice-Masiero mechanism, which I won’t talk about here.] Introduce a new iso-singlet neutral colorlesschiralsuperfield , coupling together the usual two Higgs doublet superfields. If S gains a vacuum expectation value we generate an effective -term, automatically of oder the electroweak scale with We must also modify the supersymmetry breaking terms to reflect the new structure

  28. So our superpotential so far is Yukawa terms effective -term But this too has a problem – it has an extra U(1) Peccei-Quinn symmetry Lagrangian invariant under the (global) transformation: This extra U(1) is broken with electroweak symmetry breaking (by the effective -term) masslessaxion!

  29. masslessaxion! NMSSM ChiralSuperfield Content effective -term Yukawa terms PQ breaking term

  30. The superpotential of the Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM) is [Dine, Fischler and Srednicki] [Ellis, Gunion, Haber, Roszkowski, Zwirner] Yukawa terms effective -term PQ breaking term We also need new soft supersymmetry breaking terms in the Lagrangian: Modified Higgs sector: 3 CP-even Higgs, 2 CP-odd Higgs (new real and imagnary scalar S) “ Neutralino sector: 5 neutralinos (new fermion component of S)

  31. Parameters: minimisation conditions Top left entry of CP-odd mass matrix. Becomes MSSM MA in MSSM limit. Finally: • The MSSM limit is ! 0, ! 0, keeping / and  fixed. •  and  are forced to be reasonably small due to renormalisation group running.

  32. Supersymmetric Models • Minimal SupersymmetricStandard Model (MSSM) • Next to Minimal SupersymmetricStandard Model (NMSSM) [Dine, Fischler and Srednicki] [Ellis, Gunion, Haber, Roszkowski, Zwirner] Alternative solution to Peccei–Quinn symmetry : Decouple the axion PQSNMSSM Linear S term nMSSM Eat the axion Z0 models (e.g. USSM, E6SSM) In the latter we extend the gauge group of the SM with an extra gauged U(1)0! When U(1)0 is broken as S gets a vev, Z0 eats the maslessaxion to become massive vector boson!

  33. Supersymmetric Models • Minimal SupersymmetricStandard Model (MSSM) • Next to Minimal SupersymmetricStandard Model (NMSSM) • Other variants: nmMSSM, PQSNMSSM. • U(1) extended SupersymmetricStandard Model (USSM) • Exceptional SupersymmetricStandard Model (E6SSM) [Dine, Fischler and Srednicki] [Ellis, Gunion, Haber, Roszkowski, Zwirner] [S.F. King, S. Moretti, R. Nevzrov, Phys.Rev. D73 (2006) 035009]

  34. USSM ChiralSuperfield Content Yukawa terms effective -term Problem: to avoid gauge anomalies

  35. USSM ChiralSuperfield Content Yukawa terms effective -term Problem: to avoid gauge anomalies Charges not specified in the definition of the USSM

  36. U(1) extended SupersymmetricStandard Model (USSM) Yukawa terms effective -term Modified Gauge sector, new Z0 Modified Higgs sector: 3 CP-even Higgs, 2 CP-odd Higgs (new real and imagnary scalar S) Modified Neutralino sector: 6 neutralinos: (new singlino + Zprimino )

  37. Disclaimer: I work on the E6SSM Final part included for vanity

  38. E6 inspired models For anomaly cancelation, one can use complete E6 matter multiplets New U(1)0 from E6 • Matter from 3 complete generations of E6 ) automatic cancellation of gauge anomalies! • In the E6SSM ) right-handed neutrino is a gauge singlet

  39. Exceptional SupersymmetricStandard Model (E6SSM)[Phys.Rev. D73 (2006) 035009 , Phys.Lett. B634 (2006) 278-284 S.F.King, S.Moretti & R. Nevzorov] All the SM matter fields are contained in one 27-plet of E6 per generation. 10, 1 27 3 generations of “Higgs” + 5*, 2 + exotic quarks 5*, - 3 + 5, - 2 + 1, 5 singlets + 1, 0 right handed neutrino SU(5) reps. U(1)N charge

  40. E6SSMChiralSuperfield Content Note: In it’s usual form there are also two extra SU(2) doublets included for single step gauge coupling unification, but these are negleected here for simplicity.

  41. SUSY Theory space Gauge group (vector superfields) USSM E6SSM NMSSM MSSM Chiralsuperfields Complete E6 multiplets Minimal superfields

  42. End of Supersymmetry Lecture course Thank you for listening

  43. Sfermion masses

More Related