30 likes | 129 Views
Signal Degrade (SD), Survivability Framework and Recovery Mechanisms. Nurit Sprecher, Nokia Siemens Networks Nurit.sprecher@nsn.com. SD in context of survivability framework. A recovery action may be triggered by multiple events (“elements of control”)
E N D
Signal Degrade (SD), Survivability Framework and Recovery Mechanisms Nurit Sprecher, Nokia Siemens Networks Nurit.sprecher@nsn.com
SD in context of survivability framework • A recovery action may be triggered by multiple events (“elements of control”) • In-band OAM indication of a failure or degradation • Operator’s commands • Network failure detection (e.g. loss of light, etc.) • Control plane error notification messages • Signal degrade (SD) can be a trigger • SD reported by lower layer or by section OAM can be useful. • But some SD is a property of traffic rather than path (e.g. congestion) and cannot be reported until LSP in use • How can we know if protection LSP is free of SD in 1:1? • Even with extra traffic the traffic pattern does not reliably match the protected traffic and SD might not be apparent • It is not the job of the Surv Fwk to define what SD is or how to measure it • It is not the job of Surv Fwk to define interactions between network conditions (that is policy)
SD in context of protection mechanisms: questions • Should SD be treated as a failure (absolute indication)? • If so, when SD is declared on a working path but not on the protection path, recovery action should be taken. • Should the level of degradation be reported, to ensure that recovery happens only if the protection path performs significantly better than the working path (quantitative comparison)? In such a case the protection function should be configured with the threshold. • In m:n, when priority between the path is considered, what are the criteria for judging the priority between paths that have SD and SF conditions?