1 / 69

Fiscal Reporting and Performance Management – A Conceptual Framework

Fiscal Reporting and Performance Management – A Conceptual Framework. Japan IMF Sub Acc. Ian Ball Chairman, CIPFA International. Outline. Session objective Context Key changes The conceptual framework Implementation and marketing Current status. Session Objective.

juro
Download Presentation

Fiscal Reporting and Performance Management – A Conceptual Framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fiscal Reporting and Performance Management – A Conceptual Framework Japan IMF Sub Acc Ian Ball Chairman, CIPFA International

  2. Outline • Session objective • Context • Key changes • The conceptual framework • Implementation and marketing • Current status

  3. Session Objective • To present a conceptual framework that enables high quality fiscal and performance management

  4. Why it is important…

  5. Countries with Sovereign Restructuring between 1990-2005 (Agreement Date) Source: Cruces J and Trebesch C, Sovereign Defaults: The Price of Haircuts (Preliminary Paper) December 2010

  6. Context – 1980s New Zealand • Objective was better performance from all parts of the economy • Constitutional arrangements made for ease of action • No written constitution • No states • No Upper House of Parliament • “First past the post” electoral system

  7. Context Financial management and reporting reform in the wider contexts of: • Microeconomic reform • Public sector management reform • State-Owned Enterprise Act 1986 • State Sector Act 1988 • Public Finance Act 1989 • Fiscal Responsibility Act 1994

  8. Key Changes • Permanent tenure for departmental heads replaced with fixed term contracts • Chief executives with annual performance agreements • Use of performance agreements and performance related pay within departments

  9. Key Changes • Very substantial decision-making authority granted to chief executives • Public Service Manual abolished, Treasury Instructions emasculated • No central services

  10. Key Changes • Departments responsible for own accounting systems • Output focus reflected in performance and “purchase” agreements, budgets, appropriations, & reporting • Capital charge introduced

  11. Key Changes • Accounting & appropriations moved to an accrual basis (1989 - 1991) • Financial statements & budgets progressively moved to an accrual basis (1989 - 1994)

  12. Key Changes • Financial reporting in accordance with GAAP • GAAP determined by Accounting Standards Review Board • Audit required for financial and service delivery statements

  13. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Performance Accountability Integration

  14. Performance Defined • “Owner” / “purchaser” distinction • Inputs / outputs / outcomes • “Crown” / department distinction

  15. PERFORMANCE DECISION INCENTIVES PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION AUTHORITY ON BEHAVIOR INFORMATION Accountability Framework MINISTER CHIEF EXECUTIVE

  16. Budgeting Monitoring/ • Capital Reporting • Operating Operations / Budget Implementation Integrated Management Cycle Strategic Planning

  17. “Purchase” Framework Input Output Outcome Social Benefit Revenue Cost

  18. What Are Outcomes? • Outcomes – impacts on the community (e.g., level of crime, standard of living or health status of the population)

  19. Outcomes Can be Measurable, Specifiable For example: • Quantity • Quality • Timeliness • Location • Population group (e.g. socio-economic status, children)

  20. Outcomes - An Outcome Hierarchy Example: • Biodiversity • Preservation of endangered species • Preservation of endangered birds • Preservation of Yellow-breasted Bunting

  21. What are Outputs? • Outputs – goods and services produced by an organization

  22. Output Dimensions • Quality • Quantity • Timeframe • Location • Cost

  23. OUTCOMES INTERVENTIONS Mix of actions to achieve desired outcomes Outputs Regulations Transfers Taxation Ownership

  24. INPUTS OUTPUTS OUTCOMES Direct costs • Personnel • Travel • Stores Indirect costs • Overheads Reduction in road deaths Speed of transport Pollution Driver training Road traffic research Vehicle inspections

  25. Transport Efficiency Travel Comfort Road Trauma Outcome1 2 3 Output1 2 3 Education Speed Enforcement Research

  26. “Ownership” • Objectives and scope of business • Strategy – especially products/outputs • Financial performance • Capital maintenance • Risks

  27. Financial performance indicators • Revenues • Surpluses/deficits • Cash flow performance • Debt level • Capital expenditure (new projects) • Cost of maintenance/replacement of assets

  28. Non-Financial Performance • Productivity • Legal compliance • Overall service delivery performance

  29. Capability - Financial Financial Capability: • Net worth • Asset and liability measures • Net debt • Contingent liabilities

  30. Capability – Non-financial Non-financial Capability: • Human capital • Physical assets • IT • Intellectual property • Others?

  31. Capability - Additional Dimensions • Reputation • Organisational culture • Staff morale • Political confidence • Ethics and integrity • Stakeholder relationship management • ‘Market’ (operating environment) expertise • Form of organisation / structure • Modes of production e.g. processes and systems, contracting out?

  32. Managing Risk • Key personnel • Fire or natural disaster • Business/systems failure • Financial • Political • Policy • Legal/litigation • Others?

  33. “Ownership” and “Purchase” • Measured quite differently • Financial statements key to ownership performance • Service performance statements for purchase performance • May be traded off against one another • Purchase performance normally has greater political significance

  34. “Crown”/Department Distinction Managing items on behalf of the Crown • Assets (DOC) • Liabilities (DMO) • Revenue (IRD) • Expenses (DSW)

  35. “Crown”/Department Distinction • Based on controllability • Reflected in output specifications • Reflected in balance sheet

  36. PERFORMANCE DECISION INCENTIVES PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION AUTHORITY ON BEHAVIOR INFORMATION Accountability Framework MINISTER CHIEF EXECUTIVE

  37. Performance Specification Documents - Departments • Departmental Forecast Report • Corporate/Strategic Plan • CE Performance Agreement • Purchase Agreement

  38. Performance Specification Documents - Government • Statement on Long-term Fiscal Position • Fiscal Strategy Report • Economic and Fiscal Update • Budget Policy Statement • Budget • Forecast Financial Statements • Estimates of Appropriation • Investment Statement

  39. Decision-making Authority • Human resources • Purchasing • Capital expenditure • Accommodation • Financial management • systems • information

  40. Incentives • Personal • term contracts • performance pay • Departmental • purchase agreement • budget and appropriations • capital charge

  41. Reporting • Financial performance • Service performance

  42. Departmental Reporting • Statement of Responsibility • Statement of Accounting Policy • Operating Statement • Statement of Financial Position • Statement of Cash Flows • Statement of Contingent Liabilities • Statement of ServicePerformance

  43. Reporting by the Government • Financial statements • Annual • Monthly • Snapshot of the Financial Statements

More Related