60 likes | 74 Views
Addressing challenges of complexity and lack of rationale, seeking alignment with goals, predictability, and transparency through a new funding structure. Goals include recruitment, retention, completion, and innovation to enhance student outcomes. Differentiated funding and targeted interventions are key.
E N D
What We Heard: Challenges: Too complex Too volume-driven No rationale behind some numbers What we need: Better recognition of equity goals Increased alignment with Master Plan Predictability and transparency
Separate “buckets” of funding RECRUIT & RETAIN • COF with URM and Pell bumps • Rationalized role & mission COMPLETE • Performance focused on completions only RECRUIT, RETAIN AND COMPLETE • Innovation fund: targeted interventions to improve performance on Master Plan goals Key Differences
Performance: • Remove retention? • Include specific completions? • URM? • Pell? • First generation? • Other? Innovation Fund: • Purpose? • What level of funding? • Decisions made by CCHE? (Illustrative) Issues for Discussion
Staff working on putting numbers and details to framework • Next Funding Formula Working Group meeting: June 26 • Full CCHE meeting: July 9 Next Steps