1 / 32

Terho Hautala 13.1.2004

Terho Hautala 13.1.2004. A Paper Presentation of ”Multihop Sensor Network Design for Wide-Band Communications” Proceedings of the IEEE, VOL.91, NO.8, August 2003. Outline. Introduction New Cluster-Based Network AODV Mobility and handoff Ipv6-in-IPv4 Tunneling IEEE 802.11 Measurements

jvickie
Download Presentation

Terho Hautala 13.1.2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Terho Hautala 13.1.2004 A Paper Presentation of ”Multihop Sensor Network Design for Wide-Band Communications”Proceedings of the IEEE, VOL.91, NO.8, August 2003

  2. Outline • Introduction • New Cluster-Based Network • AODV • Mobility and handoff • Ipv6-in-IPv4 Tunneling • IEEE 802.11 • Measurements • Conclusions

  3. Introduction New cluster-based network architecture Mixture of two different types of network: Infrastructure (master-and-slave) Ad-hoc Slave Nodes (SN) are communicating via their respective Master Nodes (MNs) Base stations (MNs) are mobile (AODV routing) MNs act as a Home Agent (HA) and gateways for the cluster All nodes in a cluster typically move as a group If node changes cluster MIPv6 is deployed

  4. Ad-hoc Mobility Relatively fixed Increasing mobility Headquarters Airbase Wireless only Wired and wireless Static addressing Mobile IP Mobile IP + Ad-hoc routing Introduction

  5. Introduction • Traditional cluster-based networking has difficulties when the number of nodes increases • routing complexity • network management • large overheads • In the paper a simple cluster networking is proposed. There WLAN is utilized. The goal is to provide a wide-band access for multimedia communication (video).

  6. AP LAN WLAN AP LAN WLAN AP LAN WLAN Slave Node (SN) Masternode 3 (MN3) MasterNode 1 (MN1) Masternode 2 (MN2) Masternode 4 (MN4) WLAN LAN AP WLAN LAN AP Ad-hoc channel Infrastructure channel New Cluster-Based Network GW

  7. AODV • AODV is used to manage routes between Master Nodes. • Instead of AODV DSR could also have been used, but it was not further investigated in the paper. • AODV discovers routes by means of route request (RREQ) and route reply (RREP). • Each node will reply to RREQ if it is either destination node or an intermediate node. • In the case on link breakage error message (RERR) will be sent back to the source.

  8. Mobility and handoff • If SN moves to a new cluster mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) handoff is performed. • SN will automatically configure link-local address and care-of-address (CoA) address based on the router advertisements. • The home-agent is informed of the new CoA, so it can tunnel packets arriving to the home network (original cluster) to the new location. • If SN receives a tunneled packet it should inform the source SN of the new location (route optimization).

  9. AP LAN WLAN AP LAN WLAN BU BACK WLAN LAN AP WLAN LAN AP SN sends Binding Update to inform Master Node 1 about the movement. Binding Cache is updated. BUs should also be sent to Correspondent Nodes (CNs) of SN Master Node1 (HA for SN1) replies with Binding Acknowledgement and tunnels the packets to SN1 Router Advertisement by IPv6 ROUTER Mobility and handoff (MN1) (MN3) (MN2) (MN4) • SN automatically configures care-of-address (CoA) address based on the router advertisements

  10. IPv6-in-IPv4 Tunneling • IPv6 is used for operation in the infrastructure mode. • The communication in the ad-hoc mode (between the master nodes) is based on IPv4 and AODV. • If SN communicates with SN in another cluster, IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling is used. • Master node encapsulates the IPv6 packets received from SN and sends them to the master node of the destination cluster. • The source address in IPv4 header is the address of the master node.

  11. IPv6 SN1 Data packets (MN2) WLAN LAN AP • Packets are sent to the master node of the destination cluster. • The source address in IPv4 header is the address of the master node. MN1 encapsulates the IPv6 packets received from SN1 IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling AP LAN WLAN AP LAN WLAN (MN3) (MN1)

  12. IEEE 802.11 • IEEE 802.11 supports direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS) and frequency hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) modes. • The DSSS mode is preferred if the number of clusters if small. • If the number of clusters is large, FHSS can be more suitable. • FHSS can select 79 possible hopping sequences to avoid inteference. • IEEE 802.11 is allowed several retransmission attempts (the number retransmission affects the performance)

  13. Experimental setup • Stationary , throughput and delay • Retrans = 0 and retrans = 3 • Bitrate = 128 / 384 / 768 kb/s

  14. AP LAN WLAN AP LAN WLAN SN1 (MN3) (MN1) (MN2) WLAN LAN AP Experimental setup

  15. SN-S SN-S 2 hops case: 3-hops case: SN-D 1-hop case: Same radio channel  resources are overwhelmed at higher bit rates SN-D WLAN LAN AP Scenarios AP LAN WLAN (MN1) (MN2) WLAN LAN AP (MN3)

  16. Results(throughput) Fig.1. Throughput performance for one node

  17. Results(throughput) Fig.2. Throughput performance for two node

  18. Results(delay) Fig.3. Propagation delay distributions for 1-hop communication (time resolution 10ms)

  19. Results(delay) Fig.4. Propagation delay distributions for 2-hop communication (time resolution 10ms)

  20. Results(delay) Fig.5. Propagation delay distributions for 3-hop communication (time resolution 10ms)

  21. Results(delay) Fig.6. Average delay (time resolution 10ms)

  22. Cluster is moving (routes change), delay + tput • Route change: 2-hop => 3-hop • At low bitrate delay remains almost the same • At high bitrate delay increases • Route change a->b, duration about 2 sek AODV Route Change Scenario

  23. SN-D (MN3) 2-hops (MN1) (MN2) SN-S AODV route change scenario

  24. SN-D (MN3) (MN1) (MN2) SN-S AODV route change scenario 3-hops

  25. AODV route change results Fig.7. Delays in AODV route change

  26. SN is moving (MIPv6 handover ja tunneling + BUs), delay + troughput • Route A (original) • Route B (BU has sent to HA and it is receiving packets from CN) • Route C ( CN has received BU because SN sent it after receiving a tunneled packet) • Handover delay remains same regardless the bitrate and max retries Mobile IP handoff scenario

  27. SN-D (MN3) SN-D (MN1) (MN2) SN-S Route C: SN-S  MN-2  MN-3  SN-D Route A: SN-S  MN-2  MN-1  SN-D Route B: SN-S  MN-2  MN-1   MN-2  MN-3  SN-D Route B: SN-S  MN-2  MN-1   MN-2  MN-3  SN-D Mobile IP handoff scenario HA CN

  28. Mobile IP handoff scenario • In he pa Fig.8. Average packet loss in Mobile IP

  29. Mobile IP handoff scenario Fig.9. Delays in Mobile IP

  30. Future work • Useforward error correction (FEC) codes at the application layer • Use Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) • Measure the network performance when a larger number of clusters have been utilized • Develop robust error resilient coding for video streaming • In he pa

  31. Conclusions • Assumption was that all the nodes within each cluster move as a group • To allow handoffs for some isolated nodes Mobile IP has been considered • AODV routing protocol has been used for ad-hoc routing • Experimental testbed was developed for video based sensor network and was successfully tested • In he pa

  32. Thanks! • In he pa

More Related