1 / 9

Youth Justice vs. Adult Justice

Youth Justice vs. Adult Justice Focus Question: How are youth justice and adult justice different in Canada?. Youth Criminal Justice Act. Canada has different legislation for young people who break the law The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) was passed by parliament in 2003

jyarborough
Download Presentation

Youth Justice vs. Adult Justice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Youth Justice vs. Adult Justice Focus Question: How are youth justice and adult justice different in Canada?

  2. Youth Criminal Justice Act • Canada has different legislation for young people who break the law • The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) was passed by parliament in 2003 • There has been laws that treated young offenders differently than adults since the 1890s

  3. YCJA Background • The act (Bill C-7) was passed on February 4, 2002 by the House of Commons • It went into effect on April 1, 2003 • The YCJA replaced the Young Offenders Act (YOA) • Built on the strengths and addressed weaknesses of the YOA • Wanted to have a “fairer and more effective youth justice system.” • Was first introduced in 1999 • Election and a prorogue of parliament delayed it • Had over 160 amendments

  4. Why? • “The system lacks a clear and coherent youth justice philosophy. • Incarceration is overused - Canada has the highest youth incarceration rate in the Western world, including the United States. • The courts are over-used for minor cases that can be dealt with better outside the courts. • Sentencing decisions by the courts have resulted in disparities and unfairness in youth sentencing. • The YOA does not ensure effective reintegration of a young person after being released from custody. • The process for transfer to the adult system has resulted in unfairness, complexity and delay. • The system does not make a clear distinction between serious violent offences and less serious offences. • The system does not give sufficient recognition to the concerns and interests of victims.” • - From the “Youth Criminal Justice Act: Summary and Background” • Government of Canada, • http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/pi/yj-jj/ycja-lsjpa/back-hist.html

  5. Young Offenders Stats, 1998-98

  6. Young Offenders by Province, 1998-99

  7. YCJA Continued • Young offenders: 12-17 year old youths in trouble with the law • Four Key Points: • Allows some young offenders to face consequences other than jail, such as community service • YCJA prohibits adult sentencing for youth aged 12-14 • YCHA allows adult sentencing for youth aged 14 and over who have committed serious crimes • Protects the privacy of young offenders • Media may not publish their names except if one condition is met • Allows most young offenders to avoid having a criminal record

  8. YCJA Goals • “The objectives of the youth justice system are to prevent crime; rehabilitate and reintegrate young persons into society; and ensure meaningful consequences for offences. In these ways, the system can contribute to the long-term protection of society. • The youth justice system must reflect the fact that young persons lack the maturity of adults. The youth system is different from the adult system in many respects, including: measures of accountability are consistent with young persons' reduced level of maturity; procedural protections are enhanced; rehabilitation and reintegration are given special emphasis; and the importance of timely intervention is recognized. • Young persons are to be held accountable through interventions that are fair and in proportion to the seriousness of the offence. • Within the limits of fair and proportionate accountability, interventions should reinforce respect for societal values, encourage the repair of harm done, be meaningful to the young person, respect gender, ethnic, cultural and linguistic differences and respond to the needs of Aboriginal young persons and of young persons with special requirements. • Youth justice proceedings require special guarantees to protect the rights of young people; courtesy, compassion and respect for victims; the opportunity for victims to be informed and to participate; and that parents be informed and encouraged to participate in addressing the young person's offending behaviour.” • From the “Youth Criminal Justice Act: Summary and Background” • Government of Canada, • http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/pi/yj-jj/ycja-lsjpa/back-hist.htm

  9. Criminal Code of Canada • This law defines the consequences (punishment) adults face for breaking the law (criminal offences) • Going to court is the usual consequence • Defines adult sentences, which are usually longer than youths • Allows the publication of the offenders' names by the media • Creates a criminal record for the offender

More Related