1 / 31

Hjh Zawaha Hj Idris Institute for Health Behaviour Research Ministry of Health Malaysia

How Public Perceive Health Messages? ASEAN Risk Communication TOT, IHM, 17-19 December 2012, Kuala Lumpur. Hjh Zawaha Hj Idris Institute for Health Behaviour Research Ministry of Health Malaysia. Structure of Presentation. Understanding Public Perception on Health Messages

kacia
Download Presentation

Hjh Zawaha Hj Idris Institute for Health Behaviour Research Ministry of Health Malaysia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How Public Perceive Health Messages?ASEAN Risk Communication TOT, IHM, 17-19 December 2012, Kuala Lumpur. HjhZawahaHjIdris Institute for Health Behaviour Research Ministry of Health Malaysia

  2. Structure of Presentation • Understanding Public Perception on Health Messages • What are their needs in crisis • Audience Judgments on messages • Tips in Preparing Health Messages

  3. Perception references how individuals understand and view a stimulus or an event.

  4. How the Public Perceives Health Messages • Health risk is an intangible concept. • The public responds to easy solutions. • People want absolute answers. • The public may react unfavorably to fear. • The public doubts the verity of science.

  5. Continue… • The Public has other priorities. • Individuals do not feel personally susceptible. • The public holds contradictory beliefs. • The public lacks a future orientation. • The public personalizes new information. • The public does not understand science.

  6. Public Perception on HINI

  7. Health Belief Model (HBM) on H1N1 Outbreak

  8. English

  9. English

  10. English : Blurps

  11. Click on Language to view TVC B.Malaysia English Mandarin Tamil

  12. In a serious crisis, all affected people take in information differently, process information differently and act on information differently (Reynolds, 2002)

  13. What the public seeks in a crisis • Gain the wanted facts needed to protect them, their families and their pets from the dangers they are facing • Make well-informed decisions using all available information • Have an active, participatory role in the response and recovery • Act as a “watch-guard” over resources, both public and donated monies • Recover or preserve well-being and normalcy, including economic security

  14. 5 Communication failures that kill operational success • Mixed messages from multiple experts • Information released late • Paternalistic attitudes • Not countering rumours and myths in real time • Public power struggles and confusion

  15. Audience judgments about your message • Speed of communication • Trust and credibility of the message • Empathy and caring • Competence and expertise • Honesty and openness • Commitment • Accountability

  16. Preparing Health Messages • Identifying stakeholders early in the communication process • Anticipating stakeholder questions and concerns before they are raised; • Organizing our thinking and developing prepared messages in response to anticipated stakeholder questions and concerns; • Developing key messages and supporting information within a clear, concise, transparent, and accessible framework; • Promoting open dialogue about messages both inside and outside the organization; • Providing user friendly guidance and direction to spokespersons; • Ensuring that the organization has a central repository of consistent messages; • Encouraging the organization to speak with one voice.

  17. Active Interests i.e. General population of the affected country,Neighboring countries, WHO, CDC, • Local/ International media, Other agencies Primary Affected Population i.e. Close contact/ family members/ neighbours/ caretakers Outbreak area: Affected people Decision Makers/ Regulators i.ePolicy makers, politicians Other audiences

  18. 7 steps are involved in constructing a message map • Identify who are affected? • Identify a complete list of specific concerns for each important stakeholder group. • Analyze the lists of specific concerns to identify common sets of underlying general concerns. • Develop key messages in response to each stakeholder question, concern, or perception

  19. Develop supporting facts and proofs for each key message • Conduct systematic message testing using standardized message testing procedures. • Plan for the delivery of the prepared message maps through: (1) a trained spokesperson; (2) appropriate communication channels; and (3) trusted individuals or organizations

  20. Solutions to mental noise theory that guide key message development specifically, and message mapping generally, include: Developing 3 key messages or one key message with three parts for each underlying concern or specific question (conciseness) • Keeping individual key messages brief: ideally less than 3 seconds or less than 9 words for each key message and less than 9 seconds and 27 words for the entire set of three key messages (brevity) • Developing messages that are clearly understandable by the target audience: typically at the 6th to 8th grade readability level for communications to the general public (clarity)

  21. Additional solutions include: • Placing messages within the message set so that the most important messages occupy the first and last positions • Citing third parties that are perceived as credible • Developing key messages and supporting information that address important risk perception and outrage factors such as trust, benefits, control, voluntariness, dread, fairness, reversibility, catastrophic potential, effects on children, memorability, morality, origin, and familiarity

  22. Using graphics, visual aids, analogies, and narratives (e.g., personal stories), which can increase an individual’s ability to hear, understand, and recall a message by more than 50 percent • Balancing negative key messages with positive, constructive, or solution oriented key messages, employing a ratio of least 3:1 • Avoiding unnecessary, indefensible, or non-productive uses of the words no, not, never, nothing, none

  23. Tips to Ponder • Who is perceived to be most trustworthy • Who is best suited to communicate risk messages • What messages are most effective • What messages are most respectful of different values and worldviews • What messages raise moral or ethical issues • What messages are most respectful of process • Where, when, and how the risk information should be communicated

  24. In Summary……… • Identifying audience • Audience segmentation. • Prioritize audience according to risk • Audience knowledge, perception and motivation. • Develop messages based on audience perception.

  25. Touch Heart - Message Development • Simplicity • Timely • Adequate • Relevance • Credible

  26. Ask Me Four • What is the problem? • How does the problem affect me? • What I need to know? • What I need to do?

  27. AREA of CONCERN Supportive message 1 Supportive message 2 Supportive message 3 Key message 1 How Influenza A (H1N1) Spreads Target Group. Main concern Supportive message 1 Supportive message 2 Supportive message 3 Key message 2 What your child can do to avoid getting influenza A H1N1 Supportive message 1 Supportive message 2 Supportive message 3 Key message 3 What Pregnant Women Should Know About Influenza A(H1N1)Virus

  28. Sources: Cavello V.T 2002.

  29. References • Cavello V.T., 2001, Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine,Volume 78, No. 2, pg. 382-391, June 2001 • Cavello V.T, 2002 , Message Mapping, Risk and Risk Communication, Invited Paper Presented at the World Health Organization Conference on Bio-terrorism and Risk Communication, Geneva, Switzerland. • Bennett, P. (1999) Understanding responses to risk: some basic findings. In Risk Communication and Public Health (eds P. Bennett and K. Calman), pp. 3–19,Oxford University Press, Oxford. • Bennett, P., Coles, D. and McDonald, A. (1999) Risk communication as a decision process. In Risk Communication and Public Health (eds P. Bennett and K. Calman), pp. 207–221, Oxford University Press, Oxford. • Communicating in a Crisis: Risk Communication Guidelines for Public Officials. 2002. Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Washington D.C.

More Related